PREDICTING THE ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC LEARNING BY ACADEMIC STAFF AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ZULULAND, SOUTH AFRICA

Authors

  • Neil Evans University of Zululand
  • Stephan Mutula

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/697

Keywords:

e-learning, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), inferential statistics, University of Zululand, South Africa

Abstract

In this article we provide a quantitative method to predict the acceptance of electronic learning resources by academic staff in a blended learning environment at the University of Zululand. Conceptually the study followed a positivist epistemological belief and deductive reasoning, but this article will also embrace the interpretive research paradigm to include the researchers’ insights on the results. Inferential statistics were used to predict the level of acceptance of e-learning and show the strengths and significances of the postulated Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model’s relationships. From the results, the majority of academic staff accepts the use of e-learning resources. The study concludes that UTAUT’s moderate accuracy and relevance could be improved by adopting contextualised socio-economic moderators relevant to the education sector rather than adopting those found to be significant in the financial sector of Venkatesh et al.’s (2003) study. The study’s recommendations would be firstly, to provide useful resources that will improve both teaching and learning, and secondly provide appropriate skills development and support for these resources. Another recommendation was the introduction of user policies to instill mandatory use of these resources by academic staff while concluding that the social influence relationship will strengthen with the increased interactions and relationships between management, academic and support staff.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Agarwal, R., and J. Prasad. 1997. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences 28(3), 557–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x

Argawal, R., and J. Prasad. 1998. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research 9(2), 204-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204

Atherton, J. S. 2011. Learning and teaching; Piaget's developmental theory.

http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/piaget.htm (accessed November 16, 2015).

Ajzen, I. 2008. Website. Available: http://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html (accessed November 8, 2015).

Boere, I., and M. Kruger. 2008. Developmental study towards effective practices in technology-assisted learning. Third Combined Report from Fifteen Participating South African Universities by University of Johannesburg in Collaboration with Mark Schofield of Edge Hill University, UK.

Brand, J. 2006. Consumer adoption of the online desktop.

http://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/23612/dissertation.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed October 22, 2015).

Dillon, A. 2001. User acceptance of information technology. In, Encyclopedia of human factors and ergonomics, ed. W. Karwowski. London: Taylor and Francis.

Dillon, A., and M. Morris. 1996. User acceptance of new information technology: theories and models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (31), 3–32. Available: http://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/BookChapters/User%20acceptance.htm (accessed November 8, 2015).

Downes, S. 2005. E-Learning 2.0. http://www.downes.ca/post/31741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1104966.1104968

(accessed November 16, 2015).

Evans, N. D. 2013. Predicting user acceptance of electronic learning at the University of Zululand. http://uzspace.uzulu.ac.za/handle/10530/1317 (accessed November 4, 2015).

Hair, J. F., G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2014. A Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). London: Sage.

Hair, J. F., C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19(2), 139–151. https://sem-n-r.wistia.com (November 13, 2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

Hayes, A. F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional

process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

Moran, M. 2006. College student’s acceptance of tablet personal computers: A

modification of the unified theory of acceptance and ase of technology model. http://www.homepages.dsu.edu/moranm/Research/Dissertation/Mark_Moran_Dissertation__final_.pdf (accessed June 25, 2008).

Ringle, C., S. Wende, and A. Will. 2004. SmartPLS software version 2.0.M3.

http://www.smartpls.de (accessed August 9, 2013).

Ravjee, N. 2007. The politics of e-learning in South African higher education.

http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/include/getdoc.php?id=2541&article=424&mode=pdf (accessed November 17, 2015).

Rudd J., P. Sullivan, M. King, F. Bouchard, K. Turner, M. Olson, K. Schroeder, and A. Kaplan. 2009. Education for a Smarter Planet: The Future of Learning. https://www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/global/files/dk__da_dk__education__the_future_of_learning.pdf (accessed November 17, 2015).

Siemens, G. 2004. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age.

http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm (accessed November 14, 2015).

Taiwo, A. A. and A. G. Downe. 2013. The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A meta-analytic review of empirical findings. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 49(1), 48-58.

Thompson, R. L., C. A. Higgins, and J. M. Howell. 1991. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly 15(1), 124–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249443

Venkatesh, V., M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478. http://www.cis.gsu.edu/~ghubona/info790/VenkEtAlMIQ03.pdf (accessed November 8, 2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 45(2), 186–204. http://vvenkatesh.us/Downloads/Papers/fulltext/pdf/2000(2)_MS_Venkatesh_Davis.pdf (November 16, 2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Urbach, N., and F. Ahlemann. 2010. Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA) 11(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228467554_Structural_equation_modeling_in_information_systems_research_using_partial_least_squares (accessed November 17, 2015).

Warshaw, P. R. 1980. A new model for predicting behavioral intentions: An alternative to Fishbein. Journal of Marketing Research 17(2), 153–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700201

Downloads

Published

2016-03-10

How to Cite

Evans, Neil, and Stephan Mutula. 2015. “PREDICTING THE ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC LEARNING BY ACADEMIC STAFF AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ZULULAND, SOUTH AFRICA”. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies 33 (4):1-22. https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/697.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2015-12-03
Accepted 2015-12-03
Published 2016-03-10