MANAGING CHURCH RECORDS RELATING TO INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES AT THE ANGLICAN DIOCESE OF NATAL

Authors

  • Ken Chisa University of KwaZulu-Natal
  • Ruth Hoskins UKZN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/962

Keywords:

church records, Anglican Diocese of Natal, genealogy, indigenous communities, record keeping, records management, sacrament records

Abstract

The Anglican Diocese of Natal in South Africa (hereafter the Diocese) is part of the Anglican Church of Southern Africa. It covers the western part of the KwaZulu-Natal province, west and south of the Tugela and Buffalo rivers. The Episcopal leader of the diocese is the Bishop of Natal. This study aimed to examine the current records management framework at the Archives of the Anglican Diocese of Natal (hereafter the Archives), especially with regard to records relating to indigenous laity within the Diocese. The study identified the strengths and weaknesses of this framework and recommends an effective and efficient records management protocol for the future. The study was based on a literature review and the personal experiences and observations of one of the researchers who worked at the Diocese at the time of the study. The study concludes that the Diocese does not have a clear records management programme to deliberately guide the management of indigenous related records. It recommends the need to embrace information and communication technologies (ICTs) and other innovative changes in in order to create an enabling environment to facilitate records location, accessibility, retrieval and the timely utilisation of information.

The paper argues that a reconfiguration of policy and methods needs to take place in order to acknowledge the many faceted relationships that exist between indigenous peoples and records, and to recognise the rights of indigenous communities to participate in the process of decision making about records management and practices. The paper considers these issues by examining challenges that are presented in managing existing indigenous collections in church repositories in South Africa, followed by a discussion about the challenges and opportunities that exist in the digital domain for rich and diverse collections to be created that allow for multiple perspectives.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Asia Development Bank. 2008. Defining indigenous peoples. http://www.adb.org/Documents/Policies/Indigenous_Peoples/ippp-002.asp (accessed March 17, 2016).

Bailey, K. 1994. Methods of social research. New York: Free Press.

Chisa, K. and R. Hoskins. 2014. Using church records at the Archives of the Anglican Diocese of Natal to trace indigenous ancestry: Exploring the ethical barriers. Journal of the Eastern and Southern Africa Branch of the International Council on Archives 33: 45–48.

Chisa, K. and R. Hoskins. 2015. African customary law and the protection of indigenous cultural heritage: Challenges and issues in the digitization of indigenous knowledge in South Africa. Indiliniga 15(1).

Chisa, K. and N. Ngcobo. 2013. The Diocese of Natal, 1853–2013: Celebrating 160 years of grace. Pietermaritzburg: Righthand Designs.

Digital Innovation South Africa. 2013. Home page. http://www.disa.ukzn.ac.za (accessed September 6, 2015).

Diocese of Natal. 2007. The Acts of the Diocese of Natal: As amended by the synod of the Diocese of Natal in September 2007. Pietermaritzburg: Diocese of Natal.

Diocese of Natal Archives. 1985. Access policy. Pietermaritzburg: Diocese of Natal Archives.

DISA see Digital Innovation South Africa.

Eberhard, K. 2013. Managing non-government records and private records in a national framework: Religious archives in Australia. Paper presented at the Australian Society of Archivists (ASA) Conference on Archives, the Future, Canberra, October 15–18.

Garaba, F. 2015. Disembodied archives: The disconnectedness of records and archives management practices within the Pietermaritzburg Cluster of Theological Libraries, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Verbum et Ecclesia 36(1): Article 1357. http://www.ve.org.za/index.php/VE/article/view/1357/html (accessed February 17, 2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v36i1.1357

Gardner, M. 2009. The history of the Archives of the Diocese of Natal. Pietermaritzburg: Diocese of Natal Archives.

Genealogical Society of South Africa. 2011. Church registers in South Africa – a brief outline. http://www.eggsa.org/bdms/ChurchRegisters-inSA.html (accessed February 23, 2016).

Goldman, M. 2002. Networking 2002 extra: Bridging the digital divide. http://www.flexiblelearning.net.au/nw2002/extras/digitaldivide.pdf (accessed April 15, 2015).

Hanlon, D. 1999. The chill of history: The experience, emotion and changing politics of archival research in the Pacific. Archives and Manuscripts 27(1): 8–21.

Institute of African Development. 2012. South Africa – profile. http://www.inadev.org/profile_south_africa.htm (accessed April 3, 2015).

Katon, K. 2002. What does society expect of archivists? Paper presented at the Australian Society of Archivists Conference, Sydney, August 13–17.

Kawooya, D. 2006. Copyright, indigenous knowledge and Africa’s university libraries. http://www.ifla.org/Vifla72/index.htm (accessed May 4, 2016).

Lalu, P. 2007. The virtual stampede for Africa: Digitisation, postcoloniality and archives of the liberation struggles in Southern Africa. Innovation 34: 17–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/innovation.v34i1.26531

Republic of South Africa. 2013. Protection of Personal Information Act (No. 4 of 2013). http://www.saflii.org/za/legis/num_act/popia2013380.pdf (accessed May 6, 2015).

Rosenberg, W. 2001. Politics in the archives: The ‘objectivity question’, trust, and the limitations of law. American Archivist 64(1): 87–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.9454828761277787

Downloads

Published

2017-02-17

How to Cite

Chisa, Ken, and Ruth Hoskins. 2016. “MANAGING CHURCH RECORDS RELATING TO INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES AT THE ANGLICAN DIOCESE OF NATAL”. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies 34 (3):23-35. https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/962.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2016-03-03
Accepted 2016-07-12
Published 2017-02-17