Analysis of Reproduction and Natural Regeneration of Psidium cattleianum Afzel., an Invasive Species in Eastern Madagascar

Lalatahiana Davy Randriatavy; Karen Freeman; Vonjison Rakotoarimanana; Edmond Roger; Juliana Rasoma

doi:10.25159/3005-2602/21944

Authors

Lalatahiana Davy Randriatavy University of Antananarivo https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2378-6593
Karen Freeman Madagascar Fauna and Flora Group
Vonjison Rakotoarimanana University of Antananarivo
Edmond Roger University of Antananarivo https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3401-6908
Juliana Rasoma Madagascar Fauna and Flora Group https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2007-4870

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/3005-2602/21944

Keywords:

phenology, natural regeneration, invasive species, Psidium cattleianum, Betampona Nature Reserve

Abstract

Psidium cattleianum Afzel. ex-Sabine (Myrtaceae) is an invasive alien species occurring in the Betampona Nature Reserve in eastern Madagascar, where it disrupts native vegetation. This study aimed to analyse its phenology and evaluate its natural regeneration capacity. A phenological assessment was carried out, combined with the setting up of sampling plots for floristic inventories in savoka ecosystems dominated by P. cattleianum. Field observations enabled the identification of dispersal agents, while three plots were used to quantify natural regeneration. Phenological results indicate a vegetative phase from May to October, flowering from November to March, and fruiting from November to May. The main dispersal vectors include runoff water, Eulemur fulvus albifrons, Potamochoerus larvatus, Alectroenas madagascariensis, and human activities. The density of P. cattleianum ranges from 4 to 11 individuals per square metre, with strong natural regeneration. Compared to Harungana madagascariensis and Treculia africana, the species develops a more vigorous root system from the seedling stage onward. Following ANOVA testing, cutting and artificial wounding produced a significantly higher number of sprouts than girdling. No significant difference was observed between girdling and natural wounds. Significant differences were found among classes 1, 2, 3 and 4 (p). The applied treatments showed an increase in bud production with increasing stem diameter. A wound of 4 cm² healed within approximately eight months. These results have important implications for the practical management of the reserve. Accordingly, control of this species can be achieved through manual uprooting, cutting, girdling (ringbarking), and active ecological restoration.

References

[1] I. A. Dickie, N. Koele, J. D. Blum, J. D. Gleason and M. S. McGlone, “Mycorrhizas in changing ecosystems,” Botany, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 149–160, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1139/cjb-2013-0091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2013-0091

[2] P. M. Vitousek, J. L. Dixon and O. A. Chadwick, “Parent material and paedogenic thresholds: Observations and a simple model,” Biogeochem., vol. 130, pp. 147–157, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10533-016-0249-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-016-0249-x

[3] J. Andreu and M. Vilà, “Native plant community response to alien plant invasion and removal,” Manag. Biol. Invasions, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 2011, doi: 10.3391/mbi.2011.2.1.08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2011.2.1.08

[4] D. Simberloff et al., “Impacts of biological invasions: What’s what and the way forward,” Trends Ecol. Evol., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 58–66, Jan. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013

[5] P. Pyšek, V. Jarošík, P. E. Hulme, J. Pergl, M. Hejda, U. Schaffner and M. Vilà, “A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: The interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment,” Global Change Biol., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1725–1737, May 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x

[6] R. A. Mittermeier, N. Myers, C. Goettsch Mittermeier and P. Robles Gile (Eds.), Hotspots. Earth’s biological richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. CEMEX and Conservation International. Agrupacion Sierra Madré SC, Mexico, 1999.

[7] H. Perrier de La Bâthie, “La végétation Malgache,” Annales du Musée Colonial de Marseille, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1–268, 1921.

[8] IUCN/SSC/ISSG, “IUCN Guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. IUCN-the world Conservation Union species survival,” Commission Invasive species specialist Group, 2000, http://www.iucn.org/themes/ssc/publications/policy/invasivesEng.htm.

[9] R. Y. Ratovonamana, “Étude écologique des plantes exotiques envahissantes dans les zones déforestées de la Réserve Naturelle Intégrale n°1 de Betampona, Faritany de Toamasina,” Mémoire de D.E.A., Éco. V, 94 p. + annexes, 2007.

[10] S. M. Carrière, E. Randrianasolo and J. Hennenfent, “Protected areas and the fight against bioinvasions: conflicting objectives? The case of Psidium cattleianum Sabine (Myrtaceae) around Ranomafana National Park in Madagascar,” VertigO, vol. 8-1, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.4000/vertigo.1918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.1918

[11] C. Birkinshaw, “Les aires prioritaires pour la conservation des plantes,” Ravintsara, pp. 20–21, 2002.

[12] U. Meier et al., “The BBCH system for coding the phenological growth stages of plants – history and publications,” Journal of Cultivated Plants, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 41–52, 2009 (in German), doi: 10.5073/JfK.2009.02.01.

[13] B. Rollet, “Natural regeneration in gaps. A general process of tropical rainforest dynamics,” Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, vol. 201, 1983 (in French), doi: 10.19182/bft1983.201.a19457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19182/bft1983.201.a19457

[14] P. L. Rothe, “Régénération naturelle en forêt tropicale. Le Dypterocarpus dreye (Dau) sur le versant cambodgien du golfe de Siam,” Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, no. 94, pp. 15–22, 1964.

[15] J. A. McNeely, H. A. Mooney, L. E. Neville, P. J. Neville and J. K. Waage (Eds.), Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. IUCN Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. 2001.

[16] M. Rejmánek and D. M. Richardson, “What Attributes Make Some Plant Species More Invasive?” Ecol., vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1655–1661, Sept. 1996, doi: 10.2307/2265768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2265768

[17] R. B. Iambana, “Contribution à l'étude phénologique des plantes consommées par Varecia variegata variegata dans la Réserve Naturelle Intégrale de Betampona,” Mémoire de DEA, Éco. V, 87 p. 2003.

[18] C. A. Kull, J. Tassin, H. Rangan and J.-M. Dufour-Dror, “Invasive species and land use: A South-South perspective,” Land Use Pol., vol. 36, pp. 239–246, 2014, doi:10.4314/mcd.v9i2.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/mcd.v9i2.2

[19] C. Marie, N. Sibelet, M. Dulcire, M. Rafalimaro, P. Danthu and S. M. Carrière, “Taking into account local practices and indigenous knowledge in an emergency conservation context in Madagascar,” Biodivers. Conserv., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2759–2777, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10531-009-9672-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9672-9

[20] F. M. Chmielewski and W. Köhn, “Impact of weather on yield and yield components of winter rye,” Agric. For. Meteorol., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 253–261, May 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00125-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00125-8

[21] C. G. Hopkins, Permanent soil improvement. Birmingham, AL: Tennessee Coal, Iron, and Railroad Company, 1918.

[22] M. Vila et al., “Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems,” Ecol. Lett., vol. 14, pp. 702–708, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x

[23] J. Tassin, R. Bellefontaine, E. Roger and C. Kull, “Preliminary risk assessment of invasion by introduced tree species in Madagascar,” Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, vol. 299, pp. 27–36, 2009 (in French), doi: 10.19182/bft2009.299.a20420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2009.299.a20420