WITCHCRAFT ACCUSATIONS AND THEIR SOCIAL SETTING: CASES IN THE LIMPOPO PROVINCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2309-5792/338Keywords:
Witchcraft, Social Theories, Scapegoating, Co-wives, Social CohesionAbstract
This article is the result of research findings undertaken in Limpopo Province on the subject of witchcraft beliefs. It is a narration of two villages whose residents were accused of witchcraft and had to be moved to other villages for their safety. Socio-economic conditions responsible for the communities to accuse their members of witchcraft are analysed. In the last part of the paper I draw on some classical theoretical approaches such as projection, scapegoating and materialism theories. In conclusion three statements are considered: 1) witchcraft is something real in human experience; 2) witchcraft is an imaginary crime; 3) an explanation of witchcraft accusations seen through the lens of social theories on society.
References
Babbie, E. 1989. The practice of social research. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Baholo, K.R. 1994. A pictorial response to certain witchcraft beliefs within Northern Sotho communities. MFA, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Evans-Pritchard, E.E. 1937. Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Girard, R 1982. The scapegoat. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kgatla, S. T. 2000. Moloi ga na mmala (A witch has no colour). Unpublished PhD thesis submitted to the Department of Religious Studies at UNISA, Pretoria.
Kriger, J.D. 1943. The realm of a rain-queen. A study of the pattern of Lovedu society. Johannesburg: Juta & Co.
Levack, B. 1987. The witch-hunt in early modern Europe. London: Longman.
Lofland, J. 1984. Analysing social settings. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Maheya. n.d. Unpublished report on Early Dawn farm to the Department of Agriculture. Pietersburg.
Mayer, P. 1954. Witches. Grahamstown: Rhodes University.
Stadler, J. 1994. Witches and witch-hunters. Witchcraft, generational relations and the life cycle in a Lowveld village. African Studies 55(1): 88–110.
