POLARITY IN CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL POLITICS: A UNI-INTERPOLAR ORDER?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8845/659Keywords:
Polarity, Uni-interpolarity, United States, BRIC, MINT, InterdependenceAbstract
The structure of power in the international system has generated interest amongst scholars around the globe. Some argue that the international system is unipolar. This is premised on the notion that the United States is the only state with preponderance in all components of power – military, economic, technological and cultural. Other scholars view global politics through a multipolar lens. Unlike the ‘primacists’ (proponents of unipolarity), they posit that the United States has lost its primacy in the global arena and that new players have emerged that compete with it. Furthermore, many scholars posit that the structure of power in today’s international system has become so sophisticated and complex that traditional models such as unipolarity, bipolarity and multipolarity are insufficient to explain the reality in contemporary international realpolitik. It is in this context that Huntington’s uni-multipolarity, Grevi’s interpolarity and Haass’ nonpolarity can be located. Using both primary and secondary data, this article explores the structure of power in contemporary international politics. It seeks to determine whether or not existing models are adequate to explain the dynamics of such politics. It concludes that uni-interpolarity (a hybrid of uni-multipolarity and interpolarity) best explains the features of today’s global politics.References
Adibe, J. 2014. MINT, Re-Based GDP and Poverty: A Commentary on the identity crisis in Africa’s “Largest†Economy. African Journal of Business and Economic Research 9(1): 119-134.
Ataman, M. 2003. The Impact of Non-State Actors on World Politics: A Challenge to Nation-States. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 2(1): 42-66.
Bouchard, C, J. Peterson and N. Tocci. 2013. ‘Multilateralism in the 21st Century’ in Bouchard, C, J. Peterson and Tocci (eds). Multilateralism in the 21st Century: Europe’s Quest for Effectiveness. London: Routledge.
British Broadcasting Corporation. 2014. The Mint countries: Next economic giants? January 6. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25548060
B r u e r a, H. 2015. To be or not to be: Has Mexico got what it takes to be an Emerging Power? Policy Insight 06. Gauteng: South African Institute of International Affairs.
Camilleri, J. 2002. Terrorism, Anti-Terrorism and the Globalization of Insecurity. Arena Journal 19: 7-19.
Chandramohan, B. 2014. Indonesia’s Evolving Grand Strategy: Foreign Powers. Strategic Analysis Paper. Western Australia: Future Directions International.
Chomsky, N, and G. Achcar. 2007. Perilous Power: The Middle East and US Foreign Policy: Dialogues on Terror, Democracy, War and Justice. London: Penguin.
Edelman, E. 2010. Understanding America’s Contested Primacy. Washington D.C: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
Forbes 2014a. The 2014 Millionaire Race: Goodbye BRICs, Hello MINTs. http://www.forbes.com/sites/doliaestevez/2014/01/27/the-2014-millionaire-race-goodbye-brics-hello-mints/
Forbes. 2014b. After The BRICS Are The MINTs, But Can You Make Any Money From Them? http://www.forbes.com/sites/chriswright/2014/01/06/after-the-brics-the-mints-catchy-acronym-but-can-you-make-any-money-from-it/
Grevi, G 2009. The Interpolar World: A New Scenario. Occasional Paper no. 79. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
Habib, A. 2009. South Africa's foreign policy: hegemonic aspirations, neoliberal orientations and global transformation. South African Journal of International Affairs 16(2): 143-159.
Haass, R. 2008. The Age of Nonpolarity: What will Follow US Dominance. Foreign Affairs 87 (3): 44-56.
Huntington, S. 1999. The Lonely Super Power. Foreign Affairs 78(2): 35-49.
Institute for Security Studies. 2010. Global Governance 2025: At a Critical Juncture. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
Imobighe, T. 2012. ‘Nigeria’s Quest for a Permanent Seat in a Reformed UN Security Council: Challenges and Prospects’ in Imobighe, T. and Alli, W. (eds). Perspectives on Nigeria’s National Politics and External Relations: Essays in Honour of Professor A. Bolaji Akinyemi. Ibadan: University Press PLC.
Irogbe, K. 2013. Global Political Economy and the Power of Multinational Corporations. Journal of Third World Studies 30(2): 223-247.
Jokela, J. 2011. The G-20: A Pathway to Effective Multilateralism? Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
Kissinger, H. 2014. World Order: Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History. London: Penguin Group.
Layne, C. 2012. This Time It’s Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana. International Studies Quarterly 56: 203–213.
Lazarou, E, G. Edwards, C. Hill and J. Smith. 2010. The Evolving ‘Doctrine’ of Multilateralism in the 21st Century. Mercury E-paper 3:1-34. http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/bitstream/handle/10438/4276/TheEvolvingDoctrineOfMultilateralismInThe21stCentury.pdf?sequence=1
Monyae, D. 2012. ‘The Evolving Doctrine of Multilateralism in South Africa’s Africa Policy’ in Landsberg, C and Wyk, J. (eds). South African Foreign Policy Review. Volume 1. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.
Newnham, J and G. Evans. 1998. The Penguin Dictionary of International Relations. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
National Intelligence Council. 2008. Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World. NIC 003. http://www.aicpa.org/research/cpahorizons2025/globalforces/downloadabledocuments/globaltrends.pdf
Nye, J. 2002. The American National Interest and Global Public Goods. International Affairs 78 (2): 233-244.
Nye, J. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Nye, J. 2012. The Twenty-First Century will not be a Post-American World. International Studies Quarterly, 56: 215–217.
O'Neil, A. 2015. ‘South Korea as a Middle Power: Global Ambitions and Looming Challenges’, in Snyder, S. (ed.), Middle Power Korea: Contribution to the Global Agenda. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Pellicer, O. 2006. New Powers in Global Change Mexico – a Reluctant Middle Power? Briefing Paper. Mexico City: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Renard, T. 2009. A BRIC in the World: Emerging Powers, Europe, and the Coming Order. Brussels: Egmont-Royal Institute for International Relations.
Rourke, J. 2007. International Politics on the World Stage (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Roy, D. 2013. Return of the Dragon: Rising China and Regional Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
Shim, D and P. Flamm. 2012. Rising South Korea: A Minor Player or a Regional Power? Working Papers 200. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
Slaughter, A. 2009. America's Edge: Power in the Networked Century. Foreign Affairs 88(1): 94-113.
Smith, K. 2013. Can the European Union be a Pole in a Multipolar World? The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs 48(2): 114-126.
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. (2012). http://www.sipri.org/reserch/armaments/milex/Top%2015%20table%202012.pdf
Toje, A. 2010. The Tragedy of Small Powers: The European Union under Multipolarity. Oslo: The Norwegian Atlantic Committee.
Weiss, T, D. Seyle and K. Coolidge. 2013. The Rise of Non-State Actors in Global Governance: Opportunities and Limitations. Discussion Paper. Colorado: One Earth Future Foundation.
Wezeman, P. 2011. South African Arms Supplies to Sub-Saharan Africa. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
World Bank. 2013. World Development Indicators Database. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
Zanotti, J. 2014. Turkey: Background and U.S. Relations. Washington D.C: Congressional Research Service.
Zakaria, F. 2011. The Post-American World and the Rise of the Rest. London: Penguin.
Zielonka, J. 2008. Europe as a Global Actor: Empire by Example? International Affairs 84(3): 471-484.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2015-11-25
Published 2015-11-25
