Recognition of Marriage by Repute: Its Implications on Customary Law and Gender Justice in Malawi

Ngcimezile Mbano-Mweso; Bernadette Malunga; Gift Makanje; Theresa Chome

doi:10.25159/2522-6800/12223

Authors

Ngcimezile Mbano-Mweso University of Malawi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4265-1189
Bernadette Malunga University of Malawi
Gift Makanje University of Malawi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5292-2037
Theresa Chome University of Malawi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/12223

Keywords:

marriage, customary law, valid marriage, marriage by repute, women

Abstract

Since 1995, the Constitution of Malawi has recognised marriage by repute or cohabitation as a form of marriage in the country. However, it was only in 2015 that the Marriage, Divorce and Family Relations Act formalised such a marriage by providing a criterion for courts by which the existence of the marriage can be determined. The authors argue that this Act reflects upon society by accepting this form of marriage even in traditional society. Through discourse analysis and doctrinal research methodology, the article traces how the initial concept of a valid marriage has changed to accommodate and recognise this form of marriage. Even before the statutory law had operationalised this form of marriage, traditional leaders, as a way of determining the validity of marriages, clothed these unions with some rights ordinarily attached to married people. Customary law is not static but changes over time even in a process of cross-fertilisation with statutory law, where each is culpable of being shaped and also shaping the other. The recognition of marriage by repute has changed the marriage terrain in Malawi where eighty per cent of marriages are contracted under customary law, providing gender justice for women who were initially disadvantaged when such unions were not regarded as valid marriages by not complying with formal marriage requirements in terms of custom. Such women lost all rights afforded to a wife and the necessary benefits that she would have had in a valid marriage.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Amer A and Obradovic S, ‘Recognising Recognition: Self-Other Dynamics in Everyday Encounters and Experiences’ (2022) 52(4) Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour <https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12356> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12356

Armstrong A, Beyani C, Himonga C, Kabeberi-Macharia J, Molokomme A, Ncube W, Nhlapo T, Rwezaura B and Stewart J, ‘Uncovering Reality: Excavating Women's Rights in the African Family’ (1993)7 International Journal of Law, Policy and The Family <https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/7.3.314> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/7.3.314

Benda-Beckmann F, Legal Pluralism in Malawi: Historical Development 1858-1970 and Emerging Issues (Zomba, Malawi, Kachere Series 2007).

Bennett TW, A Sourcebook of African Customary Law for Southern Africa (Juta 1991).

Bronstein V, ‘Reconceptualizing the Customary Law Debate in South Africa’ (1998) 14 South African Journal on Human Rights <https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.1998.11834984> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.1998.11834984

Chigawa M, Customary Law and Social Development: De Jure Marriages Vis a Vis De Facto Marriages at Customary Law in Malawi (Chancellor College 1987).

Fraser N, ‘Rethinking Recognition’ (2000)3 New Left Review.

Fraser N, ‘Feminist Politics in the Age of Recognition: A Two-Dimensional Approach to Gender Justice’ (2007) 1(1) Studies in Social Justice <https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v1i1.979> DOI: https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v1i1.979

Fraser N, Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World (Columbia University Press 2009).

Goredema R, ‘African Feminism: the African Woman’s Struggle for Identity’ (2010) African Yearbook of Rhetorics.

Higgins TE, Fenrich J and Tanzer Z, ‘Gender Equality and Customary Marriage: Bargaining in the Shadow of Post-Apartheid Legal Pluralism’ (2006)30(6) Fordham International Law Journal.

Htun M and Weldon L, The Logics of Gender Justice: State Action and Rights around the World (Cambridge University Press 2018) <https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277891> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277891

Nkiruka O R, African Customary Law and Gender Justice in a Progressive Democracy (LLM thesis, Rhodes University 2006).

Raday F, ‘Gender and Democratic Citizenship: The Impact of CEDAW’ (2012) 10 (2) International Journal of Constitutional Law <https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor068> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor068

Stark, B, ‘Marriage Equality, Gender Equality, and the Women’s Convention’, (2013) Michigan State Law Review.

Oppermann B, The Impact of Legal Pluralism on Women’s Status: An Examination of Marriage Laws in Egypt, South Africa, and the United States (2006)17 Hastings Women’s Law Journal.

Peters PE, ‘Our Daughters Inherit Our Land, But Our Sons Use Either Wives’ Fields: Matrilineal-matrilocal Land Tenure and the New Land Policy in Malawi’ (2010) 4(1) J of Eastern African Studies <https://doi.org/10.1080/17531050903556717> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17531050903556717

Phiri KM, ‘Some Changes in the Matrilineal Family System Among the Chewa of Malawi Since the Nineteenth Century’ (1983) 24(2) Journal of African History <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853700021976> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853700021976

Seymour WM and Bekker JC, Seymour's Customary Law in Southern Africa (Juta, 1989).

Smith L, ‘Heritage, the Power of the Past, and the Politics of (Mis)recognition’ (2022) 52(4) Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour <https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12353> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12353

The African Feminist Forum Charter of Feminist Principles for African Feminists (2007) 4 <http://www.africanfeministforum.com/> accessed 10 October 2023.

Van Uffelen N, ‘Revisiting Recognition in Energy Justice’ (2022) 92 Energy Research & Social Science <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102764> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102764

Cases

Banda v George Civil Appeal Case No 101 of 1979, NTAC (unreported).

Banda v Mvula Appeal Case No 14 of 1977 NTAC (unreported). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030098587701400416

Chimphanje v Banda Civil Appeal Case No 12 of 1974 NTAC (unreported).

Feckson Mmbewe v Thowoko Nyirenda Civil Appeal Case No 49 of 2003.

Gondwe v Gondwe Civil Appeal Case No 26 of 2002.

Humpreys Malola v Alice Malola Civil Appeal Case No 48 of 2016.

Jamav Jamal Matrimonial Cause Number 1 of 1989.

Jumbe v Nkolokosa Civil Appeal Case No 70 of 1979, NTAC (unreported).

Kakhobwe v Kakhobwe Civil Appeal Case No 102 of 1961 NTAC (unreported).

Kamphoni v Kamphoni Matrimonial Cause No 7 of 2012.

Kanyenze v Mkwapatira Civil Appeal Case No 42 of 1977, NTAC (unreported).

Khembo v Khembo Civil Appeal Case No 16 of 1979 NTAC (unreported).

Khembo v Khembo Civil Appeal Case No 26 of 1979, NTAC (unreported).

Kimminau v Common School District 170 Kan 124, 223 P. 2d 689 (1950).

Manchichi v Manchichi Civil Appeal Case No 1 of 1979, NTAC (unreported).

Maruwasa v Kaiyo Civil Appeal Case No 23 of 1973, NTAC (unreported).

Matimati v Chimwala (1964-66) ALR-Mal 34.

Mazunda v Chihana Civil Appeal Case No 17 2012.

Mphumeya v R (1923-1960) ALR-Mal 344 <https://doi.org/10.1002/mmnd.48019230322>

Mwangobola v Mwangobola Civil Appeal Case No 4 of 1980 NTAC (unreported).

Mwanza v Shaba, Civil Appeal Case No 82 of 1974, NTAC (unreported).

Nelson v Magombo Civil Appeal Case No 45 of 2012.

Njanje v Mhango Civil Appeal Case No 58 of 1931, NTAC. (unreported).

Nthenda v Mabvira Civil Appeal Case No 41 of 1981 NTAC (unreported).

Poya v Poya Civil Appeal Case No 38 of 1979, NTAC (unreported).

Tembo v Chirwa Civil Appeal Case No 96 of 1977.

Domestic and International Law Instruments

Marriage Divorce and Family Relations Act No 4 of 2015 (MDFRA).

Protocol to the African Charter on Human and People's Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, (adopted 1 July 2003, entered into force 25 November 2005).

UN Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW Commmittee) ‘General Recommendation on article 16 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women’ (30 October 2013) CEDAW/C/GC/29.