Legal Interpretative Culture and Judicial Stewardship of the Transformation Project in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/15416Keywords:
legal interpretation, transformative constitutionalism, judicial stewardship, socio-economic development, social justiceAbstract
The South African Constitution is a transformative instrument supporting actionable socio-economic rights to achieve social justice—that is, justice in terms of the distribution of wealth, opportunities and privileges within society. Social justice is the recognition that all South Africans are fellow heirs, members of the same nation, sharing the same promises. South Africa is actively engaged in an agenda of reform to address the inherited and prevailing social and economic structures that perpetuate inequality. The nation’s commitment to transformation demands that the legal interpretative culture of judges align with the ‘constitutional interpretative intent’ expressed in the Bill of Rights, which is to respect, protect and promote the fulfilment of socio-economic rights and, in so doing, advance social justice through the application of the law. This article highlights how judicial passivity undermines the Constitution’s interpretative intent and jeopardises the transformation project for social justice. It argues that South African courts must apply interpretations that are constitutionally valid, and where multiple interpretations are possible, they must choose the interpretation that best promotes the spirit, purports and objects of the rights contained in the Bill of Rights. Further, the success of the transformative project depends on judges adopting a stewardship attitude—one that reflects a broader understanding of the constitutional enterprise as a whole. An attitude of judicial stewardship towards the transformation project is of critical importance for the generational progress of all South Africans, especially when a statute has been enacted to effect systemic and structural change within society. This article critically analyses South African courts’ interpretation of section 25 of the National Water Act to illustrate the implications of judicial passivity on the transformation project and the equitable distribution of resources.
References
Baxter LG, ‘Apartheid and the South African Judiciary’ (1987) 5(2) Duke Law Magazine 9–15.
Canon BC, ‘Defining the Dimensions of Judicial Activism’ (1983) 66 Judicature 236–247.
Claassens A and Budlender G, ‘Transformative Constitutionalism and Customary Law’ (2014) 6 Constitutional Court Review 75–104 <https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2014.0005>
Colby H, Ebbersmeyer A, Heim L and Røssaak M, ‘Judging Climate Change: The Role of the Judiciary in the Fight against Climate Change’ (2020) 7(3) Oslow Law Review 168–185 <https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2020-03-03>
Currie I and De Waal J, Bill of Rights Handbook (Juta 2018).
Davis DM and Klare K, ‘Transformative Constitutionalism and the Common and Customary Law’ (2010) 26 SAJHR 403–509 <https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2010.11864997>
Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, ‘Discussion Document on the Transformation of the Judicial System and the Role of the Judiciary in the Developmental South African State: The Role of the Judiciary and the Courts in the Pursuit of the Transformation Goals’ (2012) <https://www.justice.gov.za/docs/other-docs/20120228-transf-jud.pdf> accessed 15 May 2025.
Devenish GE, ‘Fundamental Concepts and the Historical Roots of the Interpretation of Statutes in South Africa’ (1991) 24(1) De Jure 77–93.
Devenish GE, ‘The Theory and Methodology for Constitutional Interpretation in South Africa’ (2006) 69(2) Journal for Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law 238–258.
Dube F, ‘Judicial Oversight and the Constitution: Is the South African Judiciary Overstepping its Jurisdiction?’ (LLM dissertation, North-West University 2016).
Du Plessis L, ‘Theoretical (Dis-)position and Strategic Leitmotivs in Constitutional Interpretation in South Africa’ (2015) 18(5) Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 1 332–1 365 <https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i5.03>
High Level Panel, Report of the High Level Panel on the Assessment of Key Legislation and the Acceleration of Fundamental Change (Parliament of South Africa 2017).
Klare K, ‘Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism’ (1998) 14(1) SAJHR 164–188 <https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.1998.11834974>
Labuschagne P, ‘Legislative Immobility and Judicial Activism: The Impact on the Separation of Powers in South Africa’ (2013) 38(1) Journal for Contemporary History 126–141.
Lahiff E, Maluleke T, Manenzhe T and Wegerif M, Land Redistribution and Poverty Reduction in South Africa: The Livelihood Impacts of Smallholder Agriculture Under Land Reform (Report 36: Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies, University of the Western Cape 2008) <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2005.tb00209.x>
Langa P, ‘Transformative Constitutionalism’ (2006) 3 Stellenbosch Law Review 357.
Liebenberg S, Socio-Economic Rights Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution (Juta 2010).
Myburgh F, ‘Thomas Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Paradigm Shifts and Crises: Analysing Recent Changes in the Approach to Contractual Interpretation in South African Law’ (2017) 134(3) SALJ 514–542.
Okogbule NS and Brown CT, ‘Social and Economic Rights and Transformative Constitutionalism in Africa: Imperative of Expanding the Frontiers of Judicial Activism’ (2019) 16(2) US-China Law Review 52–64 <https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2019.02.002>
Olivier C, ‘A Transformative Constitutional Challenge to the Juridical Interpretation of Statutes and Contracts in South Africa’ (LLM dissertation, University of the Free State 2024).
Palshikar VG, ‘Judicial Activism’ (2007) 7 Law Review, Government Law College 55–66.
Perry MJ, ‘Judicial Activism’ (1984) 7(1) Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 69–76.
Public Affairs Research Institute, ‘Implementing the Zondo Commission Recommendations: Taking Stock of Progress and Charting a Way Forward’ (2023) <https://pari.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20231019_ZondoRecommendationsProgress_v0.4.pdf> accessed 19 May 2025.
Selzer H, ‘Judicial Activism as Exponent of the Unwritten Values Inherent in the South African Bill of Rights’ (LLM dissertation, University of South Africa 1995).
September-Van Huffel A, ‘The Evolving Developmental Role of the State as Public Trustee of South Africa’s Natural Resources and Property’ (2024) 28 Law, Democracy and Development 152–173 <https://doi.org/10.17159/2077-4907/2024/ldd.v28.7>
Steyn LC, Die Uitleg van Wette (Juta 1981).
Terreblanche S, A History of Inequality in South Africa 1652–2002 (University of Natal Press 2003).
Van der Schyff E, ‘Unpacking the Public Trust Doctrine: A Journey into Foreign Territory’ (2010) 13(5) Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 41.
Van der Schyff E, Water Research Commission the Concept of Public Trusteeship as Embedded in the South Africa National Water Act (Water Research Commission Report KV 263/10, 1998) <https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v13i5.65053>
Van der Walt AJ, ‘Transformative Constitutionalism and the Development of South African Property Law (Part 1)’ (2005) 4 TSAR 655–689.
Viljoen G, ‘The Transformed Water Regulatory Regime of South Africa [Discussion of South African Association for Water User Associations v Minister of Water and Sanitation [2020] ZAGPPHC 252 (19 June 2020)]’ (2022) 33(2) Stell LR 146–160 <https://doi.org/10.47348/SLR/2022/i2a8>
Cases
Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union v Chamber of Mines of South Africa [2017] ZACC 3.
Bothma-Batho Transport (Edms) Bpk v S Bothma and Seun Transport (Edms) Bpk 2014 (2) SA 494 (SCA).
Capitec Bank Holdings Limited and Another v Coral Lagoon Investments 194 (Pty) Ltd and Others 2021 (3) All SA 647 (SCA).
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (4) SA 938 (CC)
Centriq Insurance Company Ltd v Oosthuizen 2019 3 SA 387 (SCA).
Cool Ideas 1186 CC v Hubbard and Another 2014 (4) SA 474 (CC).
Comwezi Security Services (Pty) Ltd v Cape Empowerment Trust Ltd (759/2011) 2012 ZASCA 126 (21 September 2012).
Department of Land Affairs v Goedgelegen Tropical Fruits (Pty) Ltd [2007] ZACC 12.
Dexgroup (Pty) Ltd v Trustco Group International (Pty) Ltd 2013 6 SA 520 (SCA).
Hoban v ABSA Bank Ltd t/a United Bank 1999 (2) SA 1036 (SCA).
Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd v Smit NO 2000 10 BCLR 1079 (CC).
Illinois Central Railroad v Illinois 146 US 387 (1892).
Investigating Directorate: Serious Economic Offences v Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd: In re Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd v Smit NO 2001 (1) SA 545 (CC).
Lötter NO and Others v Minister of Water and Sanitation and Others (725/2020) [2021] ZASCA 159.
Matiso v Commanding Officer, Port Elizabeth Prison 1994 (4) SA 592 (SE).
Minister of Water and Sanitation v South African Association for Water Users Associations [2023] ZACC 09.
Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality [2012] ZASCA 13.
National Credit Regulator v Opperman 2013 2 SA 1 (CC).
North East Finance (Pty) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2013 5 SA 1 (SCA).
Novartis SA (Pty) Ltd v Maphil Trading (Pty) Ltd 2016 1 SA 518 (SCA).
S v Schietekat [1999] ZACC.
S v Thebus and Another 2003 (6) SA 505 (CC).
S v Zuma and Others 1995 (2) SA 642 (CC).
South African Association for Water User Associations v Minister of Water and Sanitation (71913/2018) [2020].
South African Association of Personal Injury Lawyers v Heath 2001 (1) SA 883 (CC).
Venter v R 1907 TS 910.
Vryenhoek and Others v Powell NO and Others 1996 (1) SA 984 (CC).
Wary Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Stalwo (Pty) and Another 2009 (1) SA 337 (CC).
Legislation
National Water Act 36 of 1998.
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
