Towards Victim-Centred Sentencing in Sexual Offences against Older Women: IT v S 2021 (2) SACR 494 (GP)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/19122

Keywords:

victim-centred sentencing, older persons, sexual offences, Older Persons Act, victim impact statements, sentencing

Abstract

This case note examines IT v S 2021 (2) SACR 494 (GP) in which the High Court confirmed a ten-year sentence imposed on a man convicted of raping his 65-year-old neighbour. It asks whether the sentencing process gave adequate effect to a victim-centred approach, understood here as ensuring the complainant’s individual circumstances are placed before the sentencing court and meaningfully weighed, and not merely taking her age into account. While the High Court expressly applied several provisions of the Older Persons Act 13 of 2006 and confirmed the statutory minimum sentence, the information before the Court about the complainant’s health, mobility and psychological impact of the offence was too limited to enable a meaningful assessment of her individual circumstances. This case note argues that the evidentiary gap rather than the absence of judicial engagement with the Older Persons Act is the principal shortcoming exposed by this case and proposes steps for closing it. That gap is compounded by the Older Persons Act, which recognises dignity and the best interests of older persons but fails to establish a mechanism requiring a court to obtain the information needed to give those principles effect at sentencing.

References

De Smet A and Hubbard D, Substantial and Compelling Circumstances in Rape Cases (Gender Research Advocacy Project, Legal Assistance Centre 2009).

Friskney R, McGlynn C and Johnson K, ‘Centring Sexual Violence Victims: What Role for Rape Victim Impact Assessments?’ (2025) International Review of Victimology 31(3) <https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580251327222> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580251327222

Hoffman-Wanderer Y, ‘Sentencing and Management of Sexual Offenders’ in L Artz and D Smythe (eds), Should We Consent? Rape Law Reform in South Africa (Juta 2008).

Makiwane PN, ‘Victim-Impact Statements at the Sentencing Stage: Giving Crime Victims a Voice’ (2021) 31(3) Obiter 606–618 <https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v31i3.12327> DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v31i3.12327

Malherbe K, ‘Older Persons Act: Out with the Old and in with the Older?’ (2007) 11(1) Law, Democracy and Development.

Spies A, ‘The Judicial Relevance and Impact of Victim Impact Statements in the Sentencing of Rape Offenders’ (2018) 31(2) South African Journal of Criminal Justice.

Van der Merwe A, ‘Sentencing’ (2023) 36(2) South African Journal of Criminal Justice <https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v36/i2a9> DOI: https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v36/i2a9

Van der Merwe A and Mitchell L-M, ‘The Use of Impact Statements, Minimum Sentences and Victims’ Privacy Interests: A Therapeutic Exploration’ (2020) 53 De Jure<https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2020/v53a1> DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2020/v53a1

Van der Merwe A and Skelton A, ‘Victims’ Mitigating Views in Sentencing Decisions: A Comparative Analysis’ (2015) 35(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies <https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu026> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu026

Cases

IT v S 2021 (2) SACR 494 (GP).

Rammoko v Director of Public Prosecutions 2003 (1) SACR 200 (SCA).

S v AK 2004 (19) CA (NAHC).

S v Chapman 1997 (3) SA 341 (SCA).

S v Hewitt 2017 (1) SACR 309 (SCA). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a2229

S v JN 2020 (2) SACR 412 (FB).

S v Magas 2001 (1) SACR 469 (SCA).

S v Matyityi 2011 (1) SACR 40 (SCA).

S v Mhlongo 2016 (2) SACR 611 (SCA).

S v Tuswa 2013 (2) SACR 269 (KZP).

Legislation

Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997.

Criminal Law Amendment (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Act 32 of 2007.

Older Persons Act 13 of 2006.

Published

2026-10-06

How to Cite

Barkley, Samantha. 2026. “Towards Victim-Centred Sentencing in Sexual Offences Against Older Women: IT V S 2021 (2) SACR 494 (GP)”. Southern African Public Law 41 (1):13 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/19122.

Issue

Section

Case Note
Received 2025-03-13
Accepted 2026-09-18
Published 2026-10-06