The Constitutional Principle of Accountability: A Study of Contemporary South African Case Law

Authors

  • Chuks Okpaluba University of Fort Hare

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/2955

Keywords:

public accountability, judicial review, rule of law, Constitution, state liability for acts of servants

Abstract

‘Accountability’ is one of the democratic values entrenched in the Constitution of South Africa, 1996. It is a value recognised throughout the Constitution and imposed upon the law-making organs of state, the Executive, the Judiciary and all public functionaries. This constitutional imperative is given pride of place among the other founding values: equality before the law, the rule of law and the supremacy of the Constitution. This study therefore sets out to investigate how the courts have grappled with the interpretation and application of the principle of accountability, the starting point being the relationship between accountability and judicial review. Therefore, in the exercise of its judicial review power, a court may enquire whether the failure of a public functionary to comply with a constitutional duty of accountability renders the decision made illegal, irrational or unreasonable. One of the many facets of the principle of accountability upon which this article dwells is to ascertain how the courts have deployed that expression in making the state and its agencies liable for the delictual wrongs committed against an individual in vindication of a breach of the individual’s constitutional right in the course of performing a public duty. Here, accountability and breach of public duty; the liability of the state for detaining illegal immigrants contrary to the prescripts of the law; the vicarious liability of the state for the criminal acts of the police and other law-enforcement officers (as in police rape cases and misuse of official firearms by police officers), and the liability of the state for delictual conduct in the context of public procurement are discussed. Having carefully analysed the available case law, this article concludes that no public functionary can brush aside the duty of accountability wherever it is imposed without being in breach of a vital constitutional mandate. Further, it is the constitutional duty of the courts, when called upon, to declare such act or conduct an infringement of the Constitution.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Black’s Law Dictionary (6 edn West Publishing Company 1990).

Carpenter G, Introduction to South African Constitutional Law (3 edn Juta 1987).

Dicey AV, The Law of the Constitution (10 edn ECS Wade 1959).

Du Bois F, ‘Getting Wrongfulness Right: A Ciceronian Attempt’ in TJ Scott and D Visser (eds), Developing Delict: Essays in Honour of Robert Feenstra (Juta 2000).

Fagan A, ‘Rethinking Wrongfulness in the Law of Delict’ (2005) 122 SALJ 90.

Hoexter C, Administrative Law in South Africa (2 edn Juta 2012).

Hood Phillips O, Constitutional and Administrative Law (7 edn Sweet & Maxwell 1987).

Hutchinson D, ‘Relational Economic Loss (or Interference with Contractual Relations): The Last Hurdle’ in TJ Scott and D Visser (eds), Developing Delict: Essays in Honour of Robert Feenstra (Juta 2000).

Okpaluba C, Judicial Approach to Constitutional Interpretation in Nigeria (Matt Madek & Co 1992).

Okpaluba C, ‘Delictual Liability of Public Authorities: Pitching the Constitutional Norm of Accountability Against the “Floodgates†Argument’ (2006) 20(2) Speculum Juris 248.

Okpaluba C, ‘Adjudicators Immunity from Liability in Negligence: The Case of the Advertising Authority of South Africa’ (2007) 17 Lesotho LJ 41.

Okpaluba C, ‘Negligent Bureaucratic Bungling and the Administrative Process’ (2007) 17(2) Lesotho LJ 1.

Okpaluba C, ‘Constitutional Damages, Procedural Due Process and the Maharaj Legacy: A Comparative Review of Recent Commonwealth Decisions (Part 1)’ (2011) 26 SAPL 256.

Okpaluba C, ‘Constitutional and Delictual Damages for Judicial Acts and Omissions: A Review of Classeen and Recent Common Law Decisions’ (2011–2012) 19 (2 Lesotho LJ 1.

Okpaluba C, ‘Constitutional Damages, Procedural Due Process and the Maharaj Legacy: A Comparative Review of Recent Commonwealth Decisions (Part 2)’ (2012) 27 SAPL 136.

Okpaluba C, ‘Bureaucratic Bungling, Deliberate Misconduct and Claims for Pure Economic Loss in the Tender Process’ (2014) 24 SA Merc LJ 387.

Okpaluba C, ‘Can a Court Review the Internal Affairs and Processes of the Legislature? Contemporary Developments in South Africa’ (2015) XLVIII CILSA 183.

Okpaluba C and Osode, PC, Government Liability: South Africa and the Commonwealth (Juta 2010).

Venter F, Constitutional Comparison: Japan, Germany, Canada and South Africa as Constitutional States (Juta 2000). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004481404

Wade ECS and GG Phillips (Bradley, AW & Bates, T St JN), Constitutional and Administrative Law (9 rev edn Longman 1977).

Cases

A v BBC [2014] UKSC 25

Absa Bank Ltd v Bond Equipment (Pretoria) (Pty) Ltd 2001 (1) SA 372 (SCA)

Administrateur, Natal v Trust Bank van Afrika Bpk 1979 (3) SA 824 (A)

Allpay Consolidated Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v CEO, SASSA 2013 (4) SA 557 (SCA)

Allpay Consolidated Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v CEO, SASSA (No 1) 2014 (1) SA 604 (CC)

Allpay Consolidated Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd v CEO, SASSA (No 2) 2014 (4) SA 179 (CC)

Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Wraith (1983) 48 ALR 500

Attorney General of Bendel State v Attorney General of the Federation [1982] 3 NCLR 1

Attorney General of the British Virgin Islands v Hartwell 2004 1 WLR 1273 (PC)

Bernard v Attorney General of Jamaica [2005] IRLR 398 (PC)

Bernstein and Others v Bester & Others NNO 1996 (2) SA 751 (CC)

Britannia Beach Estate (Pty) Ltd v Saldanha Bay Municipality 2013 (11) BCLR 1217 (CC)

Canadian National Railway Co v Norsk Pacific Steamship Co 1992 91 DLR (4th) 289

Cape Town City v SANRAL 2015 (3) SA 386 (SCA)

Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security (1) 2001 (4) SA 938 (CC)

Chirwa v Transnet Ltd 2008 (4) SA 367 (CC)

Country Cloud Trading CC v MEC, Department of Infrastructure Development, Gauteng 2015 (1) SA 1 (CC)

CR (On application of C) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 2 (27 January 2016)

De Vos NO v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2015 (2) SACR 217 (CC)

Dlanjwa v Minister of Safety and Security [2015] ZASCA 147 (1 October 2015)

Du Plessis v Road Accident Fund 2004 (1) SA 216 (SCA)

Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly 2016 (3) SA 580 (CC)

EFF v Speaker, National Assembly; DA v Speaker, National Assembly 2016 (3) SA 580 (CC)

Eleveth v Minister of Home Affairs & Another 2004 (3) All SA 322 (T)

F v Minister of Safety and Security 2012 (1) SA 536 (CC)

Faircape Property Developers (Pty) Ltd v Premier, Western Cape 2000 (2) SA 54 (C)

Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council 1999 (1) SA 374 (CC)

Fourways Haulage SA (Pty) Ltd v SANRAL 2009 (2) SA 150 (SCA)

Fundtrust (Pty) Ltd (in Liquidation) v Van Deventer 1997 (1) SA 710 (A)

Glenister v President of the Republic of South Africa 2011 (3) SA 347 (CC)

Gore NO v Minister of Finance & Others [2008] ZAGPHC 338

Gouda Boerdery BK v Transnet 2005 (5) SA 490 (SCA)

Hardy Ventures CC v Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality 2004 (1) SA 199 (T)

Hawekwa Youth Camp v Bryne 2010 (6) SA 63 (SCA)

Helen Suzman Foundation v President of the Republic of South Africa 2015 (2) SA 1 (CC)

Independent Newspapers: In re Masetlha v President of the Republic of South Africa 2008 (5) SA 31 (CC)

Institute for Democracy in South Africa v African National Congress 2005 (3) SA 280 (CC)

Jewel Thornhill v Attorney General [2015] ECarSC 75 (16 April 2015)

Johannesburg Municipality v Gauteng Development Tribunal 2010 (2) SA 554 (SCA)

Johannesburg Municipality v Gauteng Development Tribunal 2010 (6) SA 182 (CC)

JSC v Cape Bar Council 2013 (1) SA 170 (SCA)

K v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 (6) SA 419 (CC)

Khumalo v MEC, Education, KwaZulu-Natal (2013) 34 ILJ 296 (LAC)

Khumalo v MEC, Education, KwaZulu-Natal 2014 (3) BCLR 333 (CC)

Khupa v SA Transport Services 1990 (2) SA 627 (W)

Knop v Johannesburg City Council 1995 (2) SA 1 (A)

KOPM Logistics (Pty) Ltd v Premier, Gauteng Province 2013 (3) SA 105 (GNP)

Lee v Minister of Correctional Services 2013 (2) SA 144 (CC)

Le Roux v Dey (Freedom of Expression and Restorative Justice Centre) 2011 (3) SA 274 (CC)

Maharaj v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (2) [1979] AC 385 (PC)

Mashongwa v PRASA 2016 (3) SA 528 (CC)

Mayfield v First National Bank of Chattanooga, Tenn, CCA Tenn 137 F2d 1013

MEC, Education, KwaZulu-Natal v Khumalo 2011 (1) BCLR 94 (LC)

Merafong Democratic Forum v President of the Republic of South Africa 2008 (5) SA 171 (CC)

Minister of Defence v Von Benecke 2013 (2) SA 361 (SCA)

Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism v Phambili Fisheries (Pty) Ltd 2003 (6) SA 407 (SCA)

Minister of Finance v Gore NO 2007 (1) SA 111 (SCA)

Minister of Home Affairs v National Institute for Crime Prevention and the Reintegration of Offenders (NICRO) 2005 (5) SA 39 (CC)

Minister of Law and Order v Ngobo 1992 (4) SA 882 (A)

Minister of Public Works v Kyalami Ridge Ratepayers Association 2001 (3) SA 1151 (CC)

Minister of Safety and Security v Carmichele (2) 2003 (4) All SA 565 (SCA)

Minister of Safety & Security v Carmichele 2004 (2) BCLR 133 (SCA)

Minister of Safety & Security v Carmichele 2004 (3) SA 305 (SCA)

Minister of Safety & Security v Hamilton 2004 (2) SA 216 (SCA)

Minister of Safety and Security v Hlomza 2015 (1) SACR 1 (SCA)

Minister of Safety and Security v Madbiyi 2010 (2) SA 356 (SCA)

Minister of Safety and Security v Morudu 2016 1 SACR 68 (SCA)

Minister of Safety and Security v Van Duivenboden 2002 (3) All SA 741 (SCA)

Minister van Polisie v Ewels 1975 (3) SA 590 (A)

Municipal Manager: Quakeni Local Municipality v FV General Trading CC 2010 (1) SA 356 (SCA)

Ngubane v SA Transport Services 1991 (1) SA 756 (A)

Njongi v MEC, Department of Welfare, EC 2008 (4) SA 237 (CC)

Nyathi v MEC, Department of Health, Gauteng 2008 (6) SA 94 (CC).

Olitzki Property Holdings v State Tender Board 2001 (3) SA 1247 (SCA)

Pehlani v Minister of Police [2013] ZAWCHC 146 (25 September 2014)

Pepcor Retirement Fund v Financial Services Board 2003 (6) SA 38 (SCA)

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of SA & Another: In re Ex parte President of the RSA & Others 2000 (2) SA 674 (CC)

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of South Africa: In Re: Ex parte the Application of the President of the Republic of South Africa 2000 (3) BCLR 241 (CC)

Premier, Free State v Firechem Free State (Pty) Ltd 2000 (4) SA 413 (SCA)

Premier, Western Cape v Faircape Property Developers (Pty) Ltd 2003 (6) SA 13 (SCA)

President of the Republic of South Africa v SARFU (3) 1999 (10) BCLR 1059 (CC)

President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union 2000 (1) SA 1 (CC)

President of the Republic of South Africa v M & G Media Ltd 2011 (2) SA 1 (SCA)

Pro Tempo v Van der Merwe [2016] ZASCA 39 (24 March 2016)

Public Market Co of Portland v City of Portland 171 Or 522, 130 P2d 624

Rahim v Minister of Home Affairs 2016 (3) SA 218 (CC)

Rail Commuters Action Group v Transnet Ltd t/a Metrorail 2005 (2) 359 (CC)

Raja & Raja (Pty) Ltd v Ventersdorp Municipality 1961 (4) SA 402 (A)

Reuters Group plc v Viljoen NO 2001 (2) SACR 519 (C)

S v Bhulwana, S v Gwadiso 1996 (1) SA 388 (CC)

S v Coetzee 1997 (3) SA 527 (CC)

S v Gwadiso 1996 (1) SA 388 (CC)

S v Jija 1991 (2) SA 52 (E)

SABC v Democratic Alliance 2016 (2) SA 522 (SCA)

SABC v NDPP 2007 (1) SA 523 (CC).

SANRAL v Toll Collect Consortium 2013 (6) SA 356 (SCA)

SAPS v Solidarity obo Barnard 2014 (6) SA 123 (CC)

Security v Van Duivenboden 2003 (1) SA 389 (SCA)

South African Post Office v De Lacy & Another 2009 (5) SA 255 (SCA) (De Lacy)

Speaker of the National Assembly v De Lille & Another 1999 (4) SA 863 (SCA)

State ex rel Diederichs v Board of Trustees of Missoula County High School 91 Mont 300, 7 P2d 543

Steenkamp NO v State Tender Board, EC 2006 (3) SA 151 (SCA)

Transair (Pty) Ltd v National Transport Commission 1977 (3) SA 784 (A)

Transnet Ltd t/a Metrorail v Witter 2008 (6) SA 549 (SCA)

Transvaal Provincial Administrator v Coley 1925 AD 24

Trustees, Two Oceans Aquarium Trust v Kantey and Templer (Pty) Ltd 2006 (3) SA 138 (SCA)

Van Eeden v Minister of Safety & Security 2003 (1) SA 389 (SCA)

Zealand v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2008 (4) SA 458 (CC)

Legislation

Constitution of Canada, 1982

Constitution of Japan, 1947

Constitution of Lesotho, 1993

Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999

Constitution of the Republic of Namibia Act 1 of 1990

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996

German Basic Law

Immigration Act 13 of 2002

International Co-operation in Criminal Matters Act 75 of 1996

Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000

Public Service Act 103 of 1994

Downloads

Published

2018-10-09

How to Cite

Okpaluba, Chuks. 2018. “The Constitutional Principle of Accountability: A Study of Contemporary South African Case Law”. Southern African Public Law 33 (1):39 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/2955.

Issue

Section

Article
Received 2017-07-18
Accepted 2017-08-16
Published 2018-10-09