How to Make Sense of the Civil Prohibition of Hate Speech in Terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/3695

Keywords:

Hate speech, freedom of expression, Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000

Abstract

In this article the authors offer a workable interpretation of section 10 of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000. Many constitutional law and freedom of expression scholars have argued that section 10 is at least in part unconstitutional. The authors of this article analyse these scholars’ views and chart a path towards saving section 10 from unconstitutionality. Section 10 is analysed by interrogating each of the requirements for hate speech as set out in the section: ‘no person’; ‘publish, propagate, advocate or communicate words’; ‘based on one or more of the prohibited grounds’; ‘that could reasonably be construed to demonstrate a clear intention’; ‘to be hurtful; be harmful or to incite harm; promote or propagate hatred’ and the defences listed in section 12. The article concludes with a proposal for legislative amendments to section 10 to remove any doubt about its constitutionality.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Johann Anton Kok, University of Pretoria

Deputy Dean

Associate Professor

Department of Jurisprudence

Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria

Louis Botha, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Attorneys

Associate

Downloads

Published

2019-10-15

How to Cite

Kok, Johann Anton, and Louis Botha. 2019. “How to Make Sense of the Civil Prohibition of Hate Speech in Terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000”. Southern African Public Law 34 (1):37 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/3695.

Issue

Section

Article
Received 2017-12-27
Accepted 2018-11-16
Published 2019-10-15