Bringing Theory to Life in Social Justice Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2708-9355/8648Keywords:
social justice, theory, research, social assistance, social developmentAbstract
This article is written in honour of Professor Tessa Hochfeld’s life and work, as part of the special issue on social and gender justice. In the article, we seek to show that Hochfeld positioned herself within the social justice research tradition but was not satisfied with normative ideas of utopian societies; rather theory was only useful in its ability to present solutions to and highlight gaps in states’ efforts to create just societies. We propose several characteristics of theory within social justice-oriented research aiming towards positive change, which Hochfeld through her methodological approach and empirical investigations contributed to. These characteristics of social justice theory are that it is instrumental, emancipatory, incomplete, paradox-sensitive, and relational. We end by bringing these characteristics together to discuss implications for the epistemology of social justice research, for the nature of the state and for the nature of social policy solutions.
Metrics
References
Adesina, J. 2011. “Beyond the Social Protection Paradigm: Social Policy in Africa’s Development.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 32 (4): 454–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2011.647441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2011.647441
Adesina, J. O. 2020. “Policy Merchandising and Social Assistance in Africa: Don’t Call Dog Monkey for Me.” Development and Change 51 (2): 561–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12569
Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2009. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bassier, I., J. Budlender, R. Zizzamia, M. Leibbrandt, and V. Ranchhod. 2021. “Locked Down and Locked Out: Repurposing Social Assistance as Emergency Relief to Informal Workers.” World Development 139: 105271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105271
Campling, J., and B. Humphries. 2008. Social Work Research for Social Justice. New York: Red Globe.
Charmaz, K. 2011. “Grounded Theory Methods in Social Justice Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 359–380. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Coole, D. 2004. “Women, Gender and Contract: Feminist Interpretations.” In The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, edited by D. Boucher and P. Kelly, 191–210. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392928_chapter_11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392928_chapter_11
Fraser, N. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Fraser, N. 2003. “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political–Philosophical Exchange, edited by N. Fraser and A. Honneth, 7–109. London: Verso.
Fraser, N. 2007. “Re-Framing Justice in a Globalising World.” In (Mis)recognition, Social Inequality and Social Justice, edited by T. Lovell, 17–35. London: Routledge.
Fraser, N. 2009. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Columbia University Press.
Harding, S. 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity’?” In Feminist Epistemologies, edited by L. Alcoff and E. Potter. London: Routledge.
Hesse-Biber, S., and D. Leckenby. 2004. “How Feminists Practice Social Research.” In Feminist Perspectives on Social Research, edited by S. Hesse-Biber and M. Yaiser. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hochfeld, T. 2015. “Cash, Care and Social Justice: A Study of the Child Support Grant.” PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand.
Hochfeld, T., and S. Plagerson. 2011. Dignity and Stigma among South African Female Cash Transfer Recipients.” IDS Bulletin 42 (6): 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00273.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00273.x
Li, T. 2007. The Will to Improve. Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822389781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822389781
Lovell, T. 2007. “Introduction.” In (Mis)recognition, Social Inequality and Social Justice, edited by T. Lovell, 1–16. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932667
Naples, N. 2003. Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis and Activist Research. New York: Routledge.
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286
Nussbaum, M. 2003. “Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice.” Feminist Economics 9 (2–3): 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926
Nussbaum, M. 2011. Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: Belknap Harvard. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
Plagerson, S., and L. Graham. 2018. “Reflections on Research intended to Promote Development.” In Learning from Below: Citizens, Community and State Action for Development, edited by L. Patel and M. S. Ulriksen. Pretoria: HSRC.
Plagerson, S., L. Patel, T. Hochfeld, and M. S. Ulriksen. 2019. “Social Policy in South Africa: Navigating the Route to Social Development.” World Development 113: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.019
Sabates-Wheeler, R., and S. Devereux. 2008. “Transformative Social Protection: The Currency of Social Justice.” In Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies and Politics, edited by A. Barrientos and D. Hulme, 64–84. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Sabbagh, C., and M. Schmitt. 2016. “Past, Present, and Future of Social Justice Theory and Research.” In Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research, edited by C. Sabbagh and M. Schmitt. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Allen Lane. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrv7n. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674054578
Sevenhuijsen, S. 2003. “Principle Ethics and the Ethic of Care: Can They Go Together?” Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk 39: 393–99.
Tronto, J. 2010. “Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality, and Purpose.” Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (2): 158–71.
Ulriksen, M. S., and S. Plagerson. 2017. Political and Institutional Drivers of Social Security Policy in South Africa. UNRISD Working Paper 2017–12. Geneva: UNRISD. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2010.484259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2010.484259
Ulriksen, M., S. Plagerson, and T. Hochfeld. 2016. “Social Protection and Justice: Poverty, Redistribution, Dignity.” In Debates in Political and Social Thought – Perspectives on Finding a Fair Share, edited by C. Boisen and M. Murray. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315737607-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315737607-14
Williams, F. 2001. :In and Beyond New Labour: Towards a New Political Ethics of Care.” Critical Social Policy 21 (4): 467–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830102100405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026101830102100405
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2021-04-28
Published 2021-07-30
