Activities to Promote Interprofessional Practice at Primary Healthcare Level: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2957-3645/12130Keywords:
clinical practice, interprofessional practice, primary healthcare, RE-AIM, interprofessional activitiesAbstract
Currently, there is a trend towards interprofessional practice. Consequently, healthcare professionals must devise strategies to deal with the challenges faced in the public health sector. Investigating the ways in which healthcare professionals promote interprofessional care principles to manage patient care outcomes is crucial. Primary healthcare is a significant level of health service delivery, therefore, the implementation of interprofessional practice at this level is especially important. In this review, we aim to explore and describe the activities outlined in the literature, which are used to promote interprofessional practice at primary healthcare level. A systematic search of seven databases was conducted for articles published between 2008 and 2021. All articles with a quantitative, qualitative or mixed methodology, a primary healthcare facility study setting, and full-text availability were included. A methodological appraisal tool was adapted from the RE-AIM framework. Twelve studies were included in the final review. Interprofessional clinics, interprofessional collaborative practices, collaborative care processes, and interprofessional team training were the primary activities identified in the review. These studies aimed to promote interprofessional practice in healthcare settings through various activities. There was limited information regarding the efficiency of the activities. According to the findings, undertaking interprofessional collaborative practice models appears to be the most practicable strategy for implementing interprofessional activities. It is crucial that facility management support this endeavour for its implementation to be successful.
References
African Forum for Primary Health Care. (2021). About AfroPHC. https://afrophc.org/about/
Andvig, E., Syse, J., & Severinsson, E. (2014). Interprofessional collaboration in the mental health services in Norway. Nursing Research and Practice, 2014(849375), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/849375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/849375
Anthoine, E., Delmas, C., Coutherut, J., & Moret, L. (2014). Development and psychometric testing of a scale assessing the sharing of medical information and interprofessional communication: The CSI scale. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-126
Baum, F., Freeman, T., Lawless, A., Labonte, R., & Saunders, D. (2016). What is the difference between comprehensive and selective primary health care? Evidence from a five-year longitudinal realist case study in South Australia. BMJ Open, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015271
Botma, Y., & Snyman, S. (2019). Africa Interprofessional Education Network (AfrIPEN). Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(3), 274–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1605236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1605236
Cahn, P. (2020). How interprofessional collaborative practice can help dismantle systemic racism. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(4), 431–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1790224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1790224
Davidson, A., Kelly, J., Ball, L., Morgan, M., & Reidlinge, D. (2022). What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care: An integrative review. BMC Primary Care, 23(8), 4848. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01595-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01595-6
De Sutter, M., De Sutter, A., Sundahl, N., Declercq, T., & Decat, P. (2019). Interprofessional collaboration reduces the burden of caring for patients with mental illnesses in primary health care. A realist evaluation study. European Journal of General Practice, 25(4), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2019.1640209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2019.1640209
Findyartini, A., Kambey, D. R., Yusra, R. Y., Timor, A. B., Khairani, C. D., Setyorini, D., & Soemantri, D. (2019). Interprofessional collaborative practice in primary healthcare settings in Indonesia: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 17(100279). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2019.100279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2019.100279
Fowler, T., Garr, D., Mager, N., & Stanley, J. (2020). Enhancing primary care and preventive services through interprofessional practice and education. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 9(12), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-020-00371-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-020-00371-8
Frantz, J., & Rhoda, A. (2017). Implementing interprofessional education and practice: Lessons from a resource-constrained university. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(2), 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1261097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1261097
Glasgow, R. E., Askew, S., Purcell, P., Levine, E., Warner, E. T., Stange, K. C., & Bennett, G. G. (2013). Use of RE-AIM to address health inequities: Application in a low-income community health center-based weight loss and hypertension self-management program. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 3(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-013-0201-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-013-0201-8
Glasgow, R. E., Harden, S. M., Gaglio, B., Rabin, B., Smith, M. L., Porter, G. C., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2019). RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: Adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Frontiers in Public Health, 7(64), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064
Gowda, D., Curran, T., Khedagi, A., Mangold, M., Jiwani, F., Desai, U., Charon, R., & Balmer, D. (2019). Implementing an interprofessional narrative medicine program in academic clinics: Feasibility and program evaluation. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0497-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-019-0497-2
Harden, S. M., Gaglio, B., Shoup, J. A., Kinney, K. A., Johnson, S. B., Brito, F., Blackman, K. C., Zoellner, J. M., Hill, J. L., Almeida, F. A., Glasgow, R. E., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2015). Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 4, 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0141-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0141-0
Hjelle, K. M., Skutle, O., Førland, O., & Alvsvåg, H. (2016). The reablement team’s voice: A qualitative study of how an integrated multidisciplinary team experiences participation in reablement. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 575–585. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S115588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S115588
Jakobsen, F., Mette, A., & Bæk, T. (2017). The interprofessional learning experience: Findings from a qualitative study based in an outpatient setting. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(5), 613–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1322560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1322560
Kader, Z., Roman, N., & Crutzen, R. (2019). Systematic review of interventions aimed at reducing hookah pope use: Implications for practitioners and clinicians. South African Medical Journal, 109(6). https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1627303225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i6.013892
Kahlili, H., Thistlethwaite, J., El-Awaisi, A., Pfeifle, A., Gilbert, J., Lising, D., & Ward, H. (2019). Guidance on global interprofessional education and collaborative practice research: Discussion paper. Retrieved from https://interprofessionalresearch.global/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Guidance-on-Global-Interprofessional-Education-and-Collaborative-Practice-Research_Discussion-Paper_FINAL-WEB.pdf
Kock, L., Mlenzana, N. B., & Frantz, J. M. (2021). Perceptions, attitudes and understanding of health professionals of interprofessional practice at a selected community health centre. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, 13(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2724
Lafortune, C., Huson, K., Santi, S., & Stolee, P. (2015). Community-based primary health care for older adults: A qualitative study of the perceptions of clients, caregivers, and health care providers. BMC Geriatrics, 15(57), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0052-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0052-x
Légaré, F., Stacey, D., Gagnon, S., Dunn, S., Pluye, P., Frosch, D., Kryworuchko, J., Elwyn, G., Gagnon, M. P., & Graham, I. D. (2011). Validating a conceptual model for an inter-professional approach to shared decision making: A mixed methods study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(4), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01515.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01515.x
Magnussen, L., Ehiri, J., & Jolly, P. (2004). Comprehensive versus selective primary health care: Lessons for global health policy. Health Affairs, 23(3), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.167
Maia, L. C., & Antonio, A. G. (2012). Systematic reviews in dental research: A guideline. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 37(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.37.2.h606137vj3826v61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.37.2.h606137vj3826v61
Meline, T. (2006). Selecting studies for systemic review: Inclusion and exclusion criteria. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 33(Spring), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_33_s_21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/cicsd_33_S_21
Mior, S., Barnsley, J. A. N., Boon, H., Ashbury, F. D., & Haig, R. (2010). Designing a framework for the delivery of collaborative musculoskeletal care involving chiropractors and physicians in community-based primary care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 24(6), 678–689. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561821003608757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13561821003608757
Mlenzana, N., & Frantz, J. (2017). Rehabilitation model to promote interprofessional practice at primary health care level in the Western Cape of South Africa. African Journal for Physical Activity and Health Sciences, 1(2), 242–254.
Muldoon, L. K., Hogg, W. E., & Levitt, M. (2006). Primary care (PC) and primary health care (PHC): What is the difference? Canadian Journal of Public Health,97, 409–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405354
Moe, J. S. E., Bailey, A. L., Kroeker, S., & Moe, G. (2010). An interprofessional collaborative practice model: Primary-care clinical associates at the family practice setting. Healthcare Management Forum, 23(4), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcmf.2010.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcmf.2010.08.005
Muller, J. (2019). The collaborative care project: A practice-based approach to interprofessional education in a primary healthcare setting in South Africa. Education for Health, 32(3), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.4103/efH_276_19
Nagelkerk, J., Thompson, M. E., Bouthillier, M., Tompkins, A., Baer, L. J., & Trytko, J. (2018). Improving outcomes in adults with diabetes through an interprofessional collaborative practice program. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 32(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1372395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1372395
Page, M., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffman, T., Mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J., Alk, E., Brennan, S., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M., Li, T., Loder, E., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Library, 6, 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3
Reeves, S., Zwarenstein, M., Goldman, J., Barr, H., Freeth, D., Hammick, M., & Koppel, I. (2008). Interprofessional education: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002213.pub2
Riffin, C., Wolff, J., Butterworth, J., Adelman, R., & Pillemer, K. (2021). Challenges and approaches to involving family caregivers in primary care. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(7), 1644–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.031
Sanchez, A., Grandes, G., Pablo, S., Espinosa, M., Torres, A., & García-Alvarez, A. (2018). Engaging primary care professionals in collaborative processes for optimising type 2 diabetes prevention practice: The PREDIAPS cluster randomised type II hybrid implementation trial. BMC, 13(94), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0783-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0783-0
Schentrup, D., Dean, A., Whalen, K., & Chacko, L. (2018). Building interprofessional team effectiveness in a nurse-led rural health center. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 12, 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2018.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2018.05.008
Selleck, C. S., Fifolt, M., Burkart, H., Frank, J. S., Curry, W. A., & Hites, L. S. (2017). Providing primary care using an interprofessional collaborative practice model: What clinicians have learned. Journal of Professional Nursing, 33(6), 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.11.004
Shamsi, H., Almutairi, A., Mashrafi, S., & Kalbani, T. (2020). Implications of language barriers for healthcare: A systematic review. Oman Medical Journal, 35(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2020.40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2020.40
Sommerfeldt, S. C. (2015). The mangle of interprofessional health care teams: A performative study using forum theater. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393614565186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393614565186
Stans, S. E., Stevens, J. A., & Beurskens, A. J. (2013). Interprofessional practice in primary care: Development of a tailored process model. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, (6), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S42594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S42594
Suter, E., Arndt, J., Arthur, N., Parboosingh, J., & Taylor, E., Deutschlander, S. (2009). Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820802338579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820802338579
Szafran, O., Kennet, S., Bell, N., & Torti, J. (2019). Interprofessional collaboration in diabetes care: Perceptions of family physicians practicing in or not in a primary health care team. BMC Family Practice, 20(44), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0932-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-0932-9
Wang, J. M., & Zorek, J. A. (2016) Deliberate practice as a theoretical framework for interprofessional experiential education. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 7(188). https://doi.org./10.3389/fphar.2016.00188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00188
World Health Organization. (1978). The Alma-Ata declaration. International conference on primary health care, 6–12 September, Alma Ata, USSR. Retrieved from https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/almaata-declaration-en.pdf?sfvrsn=7b3c2167_2
World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva: WHO. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70185/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf;jsessionid=D2728D1B6C267EEFEA2572D1AA9AB6F4?sequence=1
World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. (1999). A vision for health care in the 21st century. International Nursing Review, 46(4), 102–103. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-7657.46.no4issue346.4.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-7657.46.no4issue346.4.x