The relationship between access to Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and poverty in South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0304-615X/59Abstract
The National Development Plan (NDP) recognises access to Information and Communications Technology (ICT) as a hindrance towards economic advancement in South Africa and lists universal access to broadband services as an enabling milestone towards reducing poverty (National Planning Commission 2011: 149). In many respects South Africa has made tremendous progress with access to basic voice telephony, as a result of the rapid expansion of mobile service providers, mainly due to convenience and the introduction of pre-paid telephony. However, with respect to other elements of ICT, especially access to services that require broadband infrastructure, South Africa has not made much progress over the past decade. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the relationship between access to ICT and poverty in South Africa in order to establish whether any meaningful correlations exist. The paper furthermore attempts to identify those areas in South Africa that are characterised by both high levels of poverty, and low levels of access to ICT. There is a strong negative correlation between the geographic spread of access to ICT and the geographic spread of poverty in South Africa. In other words, areas where poverty are relatively high are areas likely to experience relatively low access to ICT, conversely, areas where poverty are relatively low are likely to experience relatively high levels of access to ICT.
References
Abraham, R. 2007. Mobile phones and economic development: evidence from the fishing industry in India. Information Technologies and International Development 4(10): 5–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/itid.2007.4.1.5
Alkire, S. 2007. Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty, CPRC Working Paper, no. 88. Oxford, University of Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1646411
Alkire, S. and Foster, J. 2007. Counting and multidimensional poverty measures, OPHI Working Paper Series, no.7. Oxford, University of Oxford
Barrantes, R. 2007. Digital poverty: Concept and measurement, with an application to Peru. Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, Working Paper #337. Indiana, Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies
Barrantes, R. 2007a. Analysis of demand: What is digital poverty and how to measure it? In H. Galperin & J. Mariscal (eds.), Digital poverty – Latin American and Caribbean Perspectives, 29–53. Ottawa: IDRC (International Development Research Centre). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780441115.002
Basarir, H. 2011. Poor, multidimensionally speaking: Evidence from South Africa. Journal of African Economies 20(3): 463–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejr001
Benjamin, P. and Dahms, M. 1999. Socialize the modem of production – The role of telecenters in development. In R. Gomez & P. Hunt (eds.), Telecenter evaluation: A Global Perspectivem, 49–68. Ottawa: IDRC (International Development Research Centre).
Crandall, R., Lehr, W. and Litan, R. 2007. The effects of broadband deployment on output and employment:
A cross–sectional analysis of U.S. data. Issues in Economic Policy 6: 1–35.
Department of Communications. 2010. General Notice No.85, Government Gazette, No. 32939. Pretoria, Government Press
Grunfeld, H., Hak, S. and Pin, T. 2011. Understanding beneï¬ts realisation of iREACH from a capability approach perspective. Journal of Ethics and Information Technology 13: 151–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9268-4
Heeks, R. 2010. Policy Arena: Do information and communications technology contribute to economic DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1716
development? Journal of International Development 22: 625–640.
Holt, L., and Jamison, M.A. 2009. Broadband and contributions to economic growth: lessons from the US experience. Telecommunications Policy 33(10–11): 575–581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2009.08.008
ICASA. 2011. Draft Under-serviced Area Definition Regulations. General Notice, Government Gazette, No. 34662. Pretoria, Government Press
Jensen, R. 2007. The digital provide: Information (technology), market performance, and welfare in the South Indian fisheries sector. Quarterly Journal of Economics CXXII(3): 879–924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.3.879
Kenny, C. 2001. Information and communication technologies and poverty. TechKnowLogica. Retrieved from www.techknowlogica.org (Accessed 2011-09-21)
Kelly, T., Mulas, V., Raja, S., Qiang, C. and Williams, M. 2009. What role should government play in broadband development? Paper prepared for infoDev/OECD workshop on Policy Coherence in ICT for Development, InfoDev, World Bank, Washington. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264077409-6-en
Kleine, D. 2010. ICT4What? Using the Choice Framework to operationalize the capability approach to development. Journal of International Development 22(5): 674–692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1719
Levy, M.R., Chew, H.E., and Ilavarasan, P.V. 2010. The economic impact of information ajnd communication
technologies (ICT) on microenterprises in the context of development. Paper presented at the International Communication Association annual conference, Singapore, 22–26 June
May, J. 2010. Digital and other poverties: Exploring the connection in four East African countries. Paper presented to ICTD2010, London.
Molla, A. and Al-Jaghoub, S. 2007. Evaluating digital inclusion projects: A livelihood approach. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 3(6): 592–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2007.016835
Msimang, M. 2006. Universal service and universal access. In L. Thornton, Y. Carrim, P. Mtshaulana, & P. Reyburn (eds.), Telecommunications Law in South Africa, 216–245. Johannesburg: STE Publishers.
Robeyns, I. 2006. The capability approach in practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy 14(3): 351–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x
Sen, A. 1983. Development: Which way now? The Economic Journal 93(372): 745–762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2232744
Sen, A. 1987. The standard of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. 2004. Capabilities, lists and public reason: Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics 10(3): 77–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000315163
South African Constitution. 1996. Available from: http://www.info.gov.za/documents/constitution/1996/96cons2.htm#16 (accessed on 10 August 2011).
Thomson, M. 2008. ICT and development studies: Towards development 2.0. Journal of International Development 20: 821–835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1498
USAASA. 200. General Notice No. 987, Government Gazette, No. 31333. Pretoria, Government Press.
Von Maltzahn, R., and Durrheim, K. 2008. Is poverty multidimensional? A comparison of income and asset
based measures in five Southern African countries. Social Indicator Research 86: 149–162.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2015-01-19
Published 2015-01-19
