A Planet in Distress: Cross-Curricular Integrations of Visual Texts in the Mainstream Learning Context

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2312-3540/13360

Keywords:

multimodal redesign, text-remaking, visual mode, drawing, climate change

Abstract

This article aims to explore the affordances of employing the visual mode— specifically the medium of drawing—as a multimodal pedagogy to raise awareness of deforestation and climate change in the South African mainstream school context. Conducted at several public and private schools in the Gauteng and the North West provinces, the research follows nine learners between the ages of 10 and 18, who have volunteered to participate in a three-week enrichment programme involving the multimodal reimagining of a non-curricular narrative into a series of drawings, paintings and collages. The narrative, which also serves as the primary source text during each participant’s artefactual redesign journey, is a wordless picture book that explores the concept of exponential environmental change. With this visually engaging text merely acting as a springboard for the making of new meanings in the Grade 5 to 11 Social Sciences/Geography classroom, participants are granted complete autonomy in their visual representations of how the exhaustion of our natural resources and moreover the threat of global warming may be impacting upon our daily lives on a spiritual, emotional and corporeal level. Finally, each artefact is presented as primary data to offer a tripartite focus on the latter learner experiences, the expressional properties of art, as well as the viability of the proposed pedagogy in future practice.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Maretha Steyn, Akademia Higher Institute of Learning

Lecturer and B.Ed. Departmental Head at Faculty of Education.

References

UNICEF. 2022. “9 in 10 Children are Worried about Climate Change, Finds New Report From Votesforschools and UK Committee for UNICEF (UNICEF UK).” Accessed December 22, 2022. https://www.unicef.org.uk/press-releases/9-in-10-children-are-worried-about-climate-change-finds-new-report-from-votesforschools-and-uk-committee-for-unicef-unicef-uk-2/. https://doi.org/10.1093/oq/8.3.106

Baker, J. 1991. Window. London: Walker Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oq/8.3.106

Banister, P., G. Bunn, and E. Burman. 2011. Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Barthes, R. 1967. “The death of the author.” Aspen 26 (5): 20-42.

Batic, J., and P.L. Kac. “Cross-curricular analysis of picture books in the fifth grade of primary school: a case study.” CEPS Journal 10 (4): 165–185. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.910

Burn, A., and D. Parker. 2001. “Making your Mark: Digital Inscription, Animation, and a New Visual Semiotic.” Education, Communication and Information 2 (1): 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310120091913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310120091913

Burn, A., and D. Parker. 2003. Analysing Media Texts. London: Continuum.

De Jager, N. 2017. “Lord of the Flies as Graphic Novel: Multimodal Pedagogies for Prescribed Literature in High Schools.” Masters Research Report, University of the Witwatersrand. DOI: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/188771415.pdf.

Department of Education. 2002. Revised National Curriculum Statement Grades R-9 (Schools): Arts and Culture. Pretoria: Government Printers.

Earle, J., G. Keats, V. Edwards, C. Sauerman, B. Roberts and J. Gordon. 2013. Social Sciences Today: Grade 9 Learner’s Book. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Iedema, R. 2003. “Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multi-Semiotic Practice.” Visual Communication 2 (1): 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751

Jewitt, C. (2003). “Re-thinking Assessment: Multimodality, Literacy and Computer-Mediated Learning.” Assessment in Education 10 (1): 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940301698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940301698

Jewitt, C. (ed.). 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (2nd edn.). London and New York: Routledge.

Kleiner, F.S., and C. J. Mamiya. 2005. Gardner’s Art Through the Ages. (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Kress, G. 2000. “Text as the Punctuation of Semiosis: Pulling at Some Threads.” In Intertextuality and the media: from genre to everyday life, edited by Meinhof U. and J. Smith, 132–154. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Kress, G., and T. Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold Publishers.

Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2002. “Colour as a Semiotic Mode: Notes for a Grammar of Colour.” Visual Communication 1 (3): 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100306

Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034

Lähdesmäki, T., J. Baranova, S. Ylönen, A.K. Koisinen, K. Mäkinen, V. Juskiene and I. Zaleskiene. 2022. Learning Cultural Literacy through Creative Practices in Schools. Cultural and Multimodal Approaches to Meaning-Making. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89236-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89236-4

Liu, J. 2013. “Visual Images Interpretive Strategies in Multimodal Texts.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 4 (6): 1259–1263. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.6.1259-1263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.6.1259-1263

Mavers, D. 2011. Children’s Drawing and Writing: The Remarkable in the Unremarkable. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844366

MODE. 2023. “Glossary of Multimodal Terms.” Accessed December 22, 2022. https://multimodalityglossary.wordpress.com.

Newfield, D., and R. Maungedzo. 2006. “Modalising and Mobilizing Poetry in a Soweto Classroom.” English Studies in Africa 1 (49): 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00138390608691344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00138390608691344

Newfield, D. 2009. “Transmodal Semiosis in Classrooms: Case Studies from South Africa.” PhD diss., University of London Institute of Education. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10020593/.

Newfield, D. 2014. “Transformation, Transduction and the Transmodal Moment.” In The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, edited by C. Jewitt, 100–113. London: Routledge.

Ranby, P., B. Johannesson, R. Versfeld, M. Slamang and B. Roberts. 2012a. Platinum Social Sciences: Grade 5. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.

Ranby, P., B. Johannesson, R. Versfeld, M. Slamang and B. Roberts. 2012b. Platinum Social Sciences: Grade 6. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.

World Health Organisation. 2021. “2021 WHO Health and Climate Change Survey Report.” Accessed December 22, 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240038509.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-07

How to Cite

De Jager, Nicholas, and Maretha Steyn. 2023. “A Planet in Distress: Cross-Curricular Integrations of Visual Texts in the Mainstream Learning Context”. International Journal of Educational Development in Africa 8 (1):25 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2312-3540/13360.

Issue

Section

Articles