Active Go-Betweens or Passive Observers? Examining the Instructional Leadership Role of Districts in the Implementation of the History 2166 Syllabus Reform in Zimbabwe

Walter  Sengai

doi:10.25159/2312-3540/17458

Authors

Walter Sengai National University of Lesotho https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4817-5649

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2312-3540/17458

Keywords:

curriculum reform, instructional leadership, curriculum implementation, district, History 2166 Syllabus

Abstract

The tendency among most scholars over the years is to underestimate the instructional leadership role of districts, especially in the implementation of curriculum reforms, while over-emphasising the role played by other stakeholders such as schools, teachers, pressure groups, examination boards, and industries. This qualitative study draws on historical data from primary and secondary documents coupled with transcripts of in-depth interviews with 11 key informants to explore the instructional leadership role of districts in the implementation of the History 2166 Syllabus. The present account uses instructional leadership to provide an alternative dimension in explaining the participation of districts in the implementation of curriculum reforms, especially in developing countries. The key finding in this study was that the omission of districts from active participation in the implementation of the History 2166 Syllabus was not really deliberate and malicious but rather a result of the hurried manner used during the process. The article concludes that in order for curriculum reforms to succeed, districts should be at the cutting edge of the implementation process due to their intermediary role between the schools and the provincial and national instructional leadership. Districts should therefore actively participate as go-betweens rather than being demoted to passive observers such as what happened during the History 2166 Syllabus reform. I recommend that curriculum planners should thoroughly involve and consult the responsible school districts so as to harness all necessary ideas in order to facilitate the smooth implementation of curriculum reforms.

Author Biography

Walter Sengai, National University of Lesotho

National University of Lesotho

Free State University, South Africa

References

Anderson, S. E. 2006. “The School District’s Role in Educational Change.” International Journal of Educational Reform 15 (1): 13–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678790601500102.

Bantwini, B. D., and N. Diko. 2011. “Factors Affecting South African District Officials’ Capacity to Provide Effective Teacher Support.” Creative Education 2 (3): 226–235. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.23031.

Birks, M., and J. Mills. 2014. “Quality in Qualitative Research.” In Qualitative Methodology: A Practical Guide, 221–236. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920163.n13.

Blase, J., and J. Blase. 2000. “Effective Instructional Leadership: Teachers’ Perspectives on How Principals Promote Teaching and Learning in Schools.” Journal of Educational Administration 38 (2): 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320082.

Bredeson, P. V. 1996. “Superintendents’ Roles in Curriculum Development and Instructional Leadership: Instructional Visionaries, Collaborators, Supporters, and Delegators.” Journal of School Leadership 6 (3): 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268469600600303.

Chawla, D., and N. Sondhi. 2014. Research Methodology: Concepts and Cases. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.

Chitate, H. 2010. “Post Independent Zimbabwe’s New ‘O’ Level History Syllabus 2166: A Crisis of Expectations.” Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research 17 (3): 1–12.

Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. “Surveys, Longitudinal, Cross-Sectional and Trend Studies.” In Research Methods in Education, 334–360. 7th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.

Cordeiro, P. A., and W. G. Cunningham. 2013. Educational Leadership: A Bridge to Improve Practice. Boston: Pearson.

Creswell, J. W. 2015. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Lincoln: Pearson.

Cuban, L. 2008. Frogs into Princes: Writings on School Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

Daresh, J. C., M. W. Gantner, K. Dunlap, and M. Hvizdak. 2000. “Words from ‘the Trenches’: Principals’ Perspectives on Effective School Leadership Characteristics.” Journal of School Leadership 10 (1): 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460001000105.

Desimone, L. 2002. “How Can Comprehensive School Reform Models Be Successfully Implemented?” Review of Educational Research 72 (3): 433–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003433.

Driscoll, D., D. Halcoussis, and S. Svorny, 2003. “School District Size and Student Performance.” Economics of Education Review 22 (2): 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00002-X.

Elmore, R. F. 2000. Building a New Structure for School Leadership. Washington: Albert Shanker Institute.

Elmore, R. F., and D. Burney. 2002. Continuous Improvement in Community District# 2, New York City. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0011020.

Firestone, W. A. 1989. The Progress of Reform: An Appraisal of State Education Initiatives. CPRE Research Report Series RR-014. Washington: Center for Policy Research in Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED315901.pdf.

Firestone, W. A., and M. C. Martinez. 2007. “Districts, Teacher Leaders, and Distributed Leadership: Changing Instructional Practice.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 6 (1): 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601091234.

Finn, B. 1991. Young People’s Participation in Post-Compulsory Education and Training: Report of the Australian Education Council Review Committee; Executive Summary. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing.

Finnigan, K. S., A. J. Daly, and J. Che. 2013. “Systemwide Reform in Districts under Pressure: The Role of Social Networks in Defining, Acquiring, Using, and Diffusing Research Evidence.” Journal of Educational Administration 51 (4): 476–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325668.

Fuhrman, S. H., and R. F. Elmore. 1990. “Understanding Local Control in the Wake of State Education Reform.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12 (1): 82–96. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737012001082.

Fullan, M. 2006. The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Gold, B. A. 2007. Still Separate and Unequal: Segregation and the Future of Urban School Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

Hannaway, J., and K. Kimball. 1997. Reports on Reform from the Field: District and State Survey Results: Final Report. Washington: Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED413660.pdf.

Harris, A., and J. Spillane. 2013. Distributed School Leadership: Developing Tomorrow's Leaders. London: Routledge.

Honig, M. I. 2012. “District Central Office Leadership as Teaching: How Central Office Administrators Support Principals’ Development as Instructional Leaders.” Educational Administration Quarterly 48 (4): 733–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12443258.

Honig, M. I., M. A. Copland, L. Rainey, J. A. Lorton, and M. Newton. 2010. Central Office Transformation for District-Wide Teaching and Learning Improvement. Washington: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. https://doi.org/10.59656/EL-LS5509.001.

Jackson, D., and J. Temperley. 2007. “From Professional Learning Community to Networked Learning Community.” In Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas, edited by L. Stoll and K. Seashore Louis, 45–62. London: McGraw-Hill.

Jita, L. C., and M. L. Mokhele. 2014. “When Teacher Clusters Work: Selected Experiences of South African Teachers with the Cluster Approach to Professional Development.” South African Journal of Education 34 (2): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412071132.

Johnson, R. B., and L. Christensen. 2014. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches. London: Sage Publications.

Johnson, L., and C. Fuller. 2014. Culturally Responsive Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kumar, R. 2018. Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Lewis, S. 2015. “Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches.” Health Promotion Practice 16 (4): 473–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915580941.

Leithwood, K., K. Seashore Louis, S. Anderson, and K. Wahlstrom. 2004. Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning. Falcon Heights: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement. https://doi.org/10.59656/EL-SB5787.001.

Mapetere, K. 2015. “The Interactions between District- and School-Based Instructional Leadership Practices for the History Subject in the Zaka District of Zimbabwe.” PhD diss., University of the Free State. https://scholar.ufs.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/c3892135-58ea-42d0-9b9c-ab911ce4adf8/content.

Maree, K., ed. 2012. First Steps in Research. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.

Massell, D. 1998. “State Strategies for Building Local Capacity: Addressing the Needs of Standards-Based Reform.” CPRE Policy Briefs. https://repository.upenn.edu/entities/publication/7ff47cef-869a-41dd-8cf8-1e6798d00d81.

McLaughlin, M. 1990. Educational Policy and Educational Practice. Stanford: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary Teaching.

McLaughlin, M., and J. Talbert. 2003. Reforming Districts: How Districts Support School Reform. Washington: University of Washington. https://www.education.uw.edu/ctp/sites/default/files/ctpmail/PDFs/ReformingDistricts-09-2003.pdf.

McMillan, J. H., and S. Schumacher. 2014. Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

Merriam, S. B. 2015. “Qualitative Research: Designing, Implementing, and Publishing a Study.” In Handbook of Research on Scholarly Publishing and Research Methods, 125–140. Hershey: IGI Global Scientific Publishing.

Ministry of Education, Sport and Culture. 2001. Secretary’s Circular Minute No. 2 of 2001 on the Curriculum Policy. Harare: Ministry of Education, Sport and Culture.

Ndebele, C., and R. Tshuma. 2014. “Examining the Extent to which Socialist Curriculum Development and Implementation in Zimbabwe from 1980 to 2004 Took Place through the History Curriculum.” Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology 5 (3): 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891540.

‘Nei, M. F. 2024. “Collaborative Leadership Practices of District-Based Education Inspectors in Supporting Teacher Professional Development in Lesotho.” PhD diss., University of the Free State. http://hdl.handle.net/11660/12959.

Nyakudya, M. 2011. “Interactive Teaching Methods in National and Strategic Studies in Teacher Training Colleges: Defeating the Myopia of Patriotic History and Political Expediency.” Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research 23 (1): 1–12.

Okoth, T. A. 2016. “Challenges of Implementing a Top-Down Curriculum Innovation in English Language Teaching: Perspectives of Form III English Language Teachers in Kenya.” Journal of Education and Practice 7 (3): 169–177. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/28432/29174.

Peterson, K. D., J. Murphy, and P. Hallinger. 1987. “Superintendents’ Perceptions of the Control and Coordination of the Technical Core in Effective School Districts.” Educational Administration Quarterly 23 (1): 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X87023001006.

Rorrer, A. K. 2006. “Eroding Inequity: Straddling the Margin of Tolerance.” Educational Policy 20 (1): 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805285461.

Rorrer, A. K., L. Skrla, and J. J. Scheurich. 2008. “Districts as Institutional Actors in Educational Reform.” Educational Administration Quarterly 44 (3): 307–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08318962.

Sengai, W., and M. L. Mokhele. 2020. “Teachers’ Perceptions on the Development and Implementation of History 2166 Syllabus Reform in Zimbabwe.” e-Bangi 17 (6): 133–148.

Skrla, L., J. J. Scheurich, and J. F. Johnson Jr. 2001. “Introduction: Toward a New Consensus on High Academic Achievement for All Children.” Education and Urban Society 33 (3): 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124501333001.

Silavwe, C. D. 2016. “Implementing Curriculum Change in Teacher Education: A Top-Down Approach.” PhD diss., University of Zambia. https://dspace.unza.zm/items/f1a0592d-543b-48f2-847c-c5d02be8c944.

Smith, M. S., and J. O’Day. 1990. “Systemic School Reform.” Journal of Education Policy 5 (5): 233–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939008549074.

Snead, J. 2018. “Curriculum Innovation: Navigating the Tensions between a Standardised Curriculum and Professional Autonomy.” PhD diss., Leeds Beckett University. https://figshare.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/articles/thesis/Curriculum_innovation_navigating_the_tensions_betwen_a_standardised_curriculum_and_professional_autonomy/21551985?file=38202786.

Spillane, J. P. 1996. “School Districts Matter: Local Educational Authorities and State Instructional Policy.” Educational Policy 10 (1): 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904896010001004.

Spillane, J. P. 1998. “State Policy and the Non-Monolithic Nature of the Local School District: Organizational and Professional Considerations.” American Educational Research Journal 35 (1): 33–63. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035001033.

Spillane, J. P., B. J. Reiser, and T. Reimer. 2002. “Policy Implementation and Cognition: Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research.” Review of Educational Research 72 (3): 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387.

Spillane, J. P., and C. L. Thompson. 1997. “Reconstructing Conceptions of Local Capacity: The Local Education Agency’s Capacity for Ambitious Instructional Reform.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19 (2): 185–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737019002185.

Tendi, B. M. 2010. Making History in Mugabe’s Zimbabwe: Politics, Intellectuals and the Media. Vol. 4. London: Peter Lang.