SERGEY PROKOFIEV’s PETER AND THE WOLF THROUGH AN INTERMEDIAL LENS

Authors

  • Elma de Kock

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/173

Keywords:

intermediality, stages of practice-based research, Peter and the Wolf, Adaptation

Abstract

Peter and the wolf is an intermedial work based on a folk tale originally written and composed by the Russian composer Sergey Prokofiev in 1936 (Hanson and Hanson 1964). Since few recent adaptations of the work in Afrikaans exist, a combined intermedial project was undertaken to recreate the work using practice-based research. The stages of this research method have brought forth a poetic text, the realisation of the original music, illustrations, and a voice artist to read the created text. To accomplish the final artistic product, it was important to obtain a theoretical foundation of practice-based research, intermediality, adaptation and the different media involved in the created word. The intermedial effects between the different media in the project provided the results of the study, stemming not only from the readers’ simultaneous experiences of the media as they read or listen to the work but, as it also became clear, from the mutually complementary effects between the different media of which their combination provided a richer final product.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abbott, H. P. 2011. Narrativity. In The living handbook of narratology, ed. P. Hühn, J. C. Meister, J. Pier and W. Schmid. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press. http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/index.php/Narrativity (accessed August 17, 2011).

Anon. n.d. Peter und der Wolf. http://www.beltz.de/de/kinder-jugendbuch/beltz-gelberg/ab-12-jahre/titel/peter-und-der-wolf-1.html (accessed June 26, 2015).

Brillenburg Wurth, K. 2006. Multimediality, intermediality, and medially complex digital poetry. RiLUnE 5: 1–18.

Brown, N. 2000. The representation of practice. Working Papers in Art and Design 1. http://

sitem.hertz.ac.uk/artdes_research/papers/wpades/vol1/brown2full.html (accessed June 26,

.

De Freitas, N. 2002. Towards a definition of studio documentation: Working tool and transparent record. Working Papers in Art and Design 2.

http://sitem.hertz.ac.uk/artdes_research/papers/wpades/vol2/freitas2full.html (accessed July

, 2015).

De Freitas, N. 2007. Activating a research context in art and design practice. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 1(2): 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2007.010214

Fisher, C. J. and M. A. Natarella. 1982. Young children’s preferences in poetry: A national survey of first, second and third graders. Research in the Teaching of English 16(4): 339–354.

Gander, P. 1999. Two myths about immersion in new storytelling media. Lund University Cognitive Studies 80: 1–16. http://www.pierregander.com/research/two_myths_about_immersion.pdf (accessed July 30, 2015).

Gromala, D. and J. Seo. 2008. Touching light: Post-traditional immersion in interactive artistic environments. In Educating artists for the future, ed. M. Alexenberg, 175–190. Bristol and Chicago, IL: Intellect Press.

Hanson, L. and E. Hanson. 1964. Prokofiev: The prodigal son. London: Cassell.

Lycouris, S. 2000. The documentation of practice: framing trace. Working Papers in Art and

Design 1. http://sitem.hertz.ac.uk/artdes_research/papers/wpades/vol1/lycouris2full.html

(accessed August 8, 2015).

McMillin, S. 2006. The musical as drama. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Morse, M. 2003. The poetics of interactivity. In Woman, art, and technology, ed. J. Malloy, 16–33. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Nimkulrat, N. 2007. The role of documentation in practice-led research. Journal of Research

Practice 3(1): Article M6. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/58/83 (accessed

August 8, 2015).

Packer, R. and K. Jordan. 2001. Multimedia: From Wagner to virtual reality. New York and

London: W.W. Norton.

Prokofiëf, S. 1975. Pieter en die wolf. Trans. L. Pienaar. Cape Town: Haum.

Prokofiëf, S. 1998. Pieter en die wolf. Retold by C. Rudolph. Johannesburg: Gallo Record

Company [CD].

Prokofiev, S. 2003. Peter and the wolf. Dublin: Bloomsbury.

Ryan, M. L. 2009. Narration in various media. In Handbook of narratology, ed. P. Hühn, J. P. W. Schmid and J. Schönert, 263–281. New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Schmöe, S. 2003. Peter und der Wolf, neu aufgelegt: Ein Nachtstück. http://www.omm.de/

feuilleton/BELTZ-peter-und-der-wolf.html (accessed August 8, 2015).

Scrivener, S. A. R. and P. Chapman. 2004. The practical implications of applying a theory of

practice based research: A case study. Working Papers in Art and Design 3. http://sitem.

hertz.ac.uk/artdes_research/papers/wpades/vol3/ssfull.html (accessed August 10, 2015).

Wolf, W. 1999. The musicalization of fiction: A study in the theory and history of intermediality. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Wolf, W. 2005. Intermediality. In Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, ed. D. Herman, M. Jahn and M.-L. Ryan, 252–256. London: Routledge.

Wolf, W. 2008. The relevance of ‘mediality’ and ‘intermediality’ to academic studies of English Literature. In Mediality/Intermediality (Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 21), ed. A. Fischer, M. Heusser and A. H. Jucker, 15–43. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

Wolfman, U. R. 2013. Richard Wagner’s concept of the ‘Gesamtkunstwerk’. http://www.interlude.hk/front/richard-wagners-concept-of-the-gesamtkunstwerk/ (accessed August 8, 2015).

Downloads

Published

2015-11-18

How to Cite

de Kock, Elma. 2015. “SERGEY PROKOFIEV’s PETER AND THE WOLF THROUGH AN INTERMEDIAL LENS”. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies 33 (2):140-54. https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/173.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2015-05-05
Accepted 2015-10-02
Published 2015-11-18