Unveiling Jane Eyre: Space Escape and the Construction of Subjectivity through a Foucauldian Lens

Zhixing Nie; Hardev Kaur; Mani Mangai

doi:10.25159/1753-5387/15716

Authors

Zhixing Nie Universiti Putra Malaysia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5334-7512
Hardev Kaur Universiti Putra Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6979-8370
Mani Mangai Universiti Putra Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6938-3749

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/1753-5387/15716

Keywords:

Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre, Foucault, space escape, subjectivity

Abstract

This paper reexamines Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre through a Foucauldian lens, focusing on how traditional societal structures and the rise of capitalism impact women in 19th-century Britain, as observed by literary critic Sandra M. Gilbert and Gayatri C. Spivak. It analyses Jane’s journey through oppressive environments such as Gateshead Hall, Lowood School, Thornfield Hall, and Marsh End, culminating in her retreat to Ferndean Manor. These settings are interpreted as sites of power that impose disciplinary measures on Jane, both physically and mentally, with windows symbolising possible escape routes. The study argues that Jane represents a female rebel challenging patriarchal constraints and seeking personal freedom and equality. Despite her attempts to transcend societal and economic confines, her ultimate settlement at Ferndean Manor highlights the persistent influence of the old societal order, illustrating the novel’s realism and the complex, inescapable nature of reality. This interpretation enriches the ongoing scholarly discussion about Jane Eyre in light of its relevance to discussions of gender, power dynamics, and societal change.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anonymous. 1847. “The Last New Novel.” The Mirror 2: 360–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican08281847-389m

Ardener, S., F. Bowie, and Kirkwood, D. 2021. Women and Missions: Past and Present: Anthropological and Historical Perceptions. London: Routledge.

Bachelard, G. 2014, The Poetics of Space. London: Penguin.

Berman, C. V. 2000. “Creole Family Politics in Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 33 (3): 328. https://doi.org/10.2307/1346168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1346168

Bloch, S., and E. A. Olivares‐Pelayo. 2024. “Prison Geographies: Nine Disciplinary Approaches.” Geography Compass,18 (3): e12742. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12742

Bossche, C. R. V. 2005. “What Did Jane Eyre Do? Ideology, Agency, Class, and the Novel.” Narrative 13 (1): 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2005.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2005.0001

Brontë, C. 2008. Jane Eyre. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bruce, S., and K. Smits. 2015. Feminist Moments: Reading Feminist Texts. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Dios González, S. 2015. “Framed Images in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre.” PhD thesis, University of La Laguna.

Foster, S. 2012. Victorian Women’s Fiction: Marriage, Freedom, and the Individual (Vol. 5). London: Routledge.

Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. 1980. Power and Knowledge. New York: The Harvester Press.

Foucault, M. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry 8 (4): 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448181

Foucault, M. 2005. The Order of Things. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996645

Gao, X. 2005. Foucault’s Aesthetics of Existence. Beijing: Renmin University Press.

Gaskell, E. 2009. The Life of Charlotte Brontë. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199554768.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199554768.001.0001

Gilbert, S. M., and Gubar, S. 2020. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252972

Gilead, S. 1987. “Liminality and Antiliminality in Charlotte Bronte’s Novels: Shirley Reads Jane Eyre.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 29 (3): 302–322.

Goodwin, M. C. 1998. “The Black Woman in the Attic: Law, Metaphor, and Madness in Jane Eyre.” Rutgers LJ 30: 597.

Han, Y. 2023. “Discourse Power Analysis of Narsnein in Brick Lane under Foucault’s Theory of Power” Master’s thesis, Liaoning University. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27209/d.cnki.glniu.2023.000700.

Haskell, M. 2016. From Reverence to Rape: The Treatment of Women in the Movies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hetherington, K. 1998. “In Place of Geometry: The Materiality of Place.” The Sociological Review 45 (1_suppl): 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1997.tb03461.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1997.tb03461.x

Jin, L., Y. K. Winardi, and E. R. Linuwih. 2022.“Self-actualization in Jane Eyre’s Main Character: A Feminism Study.” Elite Journal: International Journal of Education, Language, and Literature 2 (1): 25–39.

Klotz, M. 2005. “Rearranging Furniture in Jane Eyre and Villette.” ESC: English Studies in Canada 31 (1): 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1353/esc.2007.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/esc.2007.0003

Kreilkamp, I. 2005. Voice and the Victorian Storyteller (Vol. 49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511484865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511484865

Lanser, S. S. 1992. Fictions of Authority: Women Writers and Narrative Voice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Li, Y. 2022. “Docile Bodies in Chinese Schools: What Defines a Future Postmodern Education?” Critical Education 13 (2): 22–44.

Lilja, M., M. Baaz, M. Schulz, and S. Vinthagen. 2017. “How Resistance Encourages Resistance: Theorizing the Nexus between Power, ‘Organised Resistance’ and ‘Everyday Resistance.’” Journal of Political Power 10 (1): 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2017.1286084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2017.1286084

Lloyd, G. 2002. The Man of Reason: Male and Female in Western Philosophy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203423240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203423240

Loh, L. 2015. Intersectionality in Jane Eyre and its Adaptations. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, University of Arkansas. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1105.

London, B. 1991. “The Pleasures of Submission: Jane Eyre and the Production of the Text.” ELH 58 (1): 195–213. https://doi.org/10.2307/2873399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2873399

Loonate, F. 2023. “Power and the Prison: A Foucauldian Perspective on Herman Charles Bosnian’s Cold Stone Jug and Willemsdorp.” Journal of Literary Studies 39: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.25159/1753-5387/13007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/1753-5387/13007

Manokha, I. 2018. “Surveillance, Panopticism, and Self-discipline in the Digital Age.” Surveillance and Society 16 (2). https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v16i2.8346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v16i2.8346

Mohamad, M., and C. Ng. 2006. Feminism and the Women’s Movement in Malaysia: An Unsung (r) Evolution. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099315

Moran, M. 2006. Victorian Literature and Culture. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

O’Malley, and P. Rose. 2018. “Darwin’s Failures: Childless Women in the Nineteenth–Century British Novel” CUNY Academic Works.

Peters, J. G. 2004. “We Stood at God’s Feet, Equal: Equality, Subversion, and Religion in Jane Eyre.” Brontë Studies 29 (1): 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1179/bst.2004.29.1.53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/bst.2004.29.1.53

Pietrzak-Franger, M. 2012.“Adapting Victorian Novels: The Poetics of Glass in Jane Eyre and Wuthering Heights.” Adaptation 5 (2): 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/aps019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/aps019

Piro, J. M. 2008. “Foucault and the Architecture of Surveillance: Creating Regimes of Power in Schools, Shrines, and Society.” Educational Studies 44 (1): 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131940802225036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131940802225036

Plasa, C. 2013. “Silent Revolt: Slavery and the Politics of Metaphor in Jane Eyre.” In The Discourse of Slavery. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315800233

Poitras, I. E. 2020. The Method in the Madwoman: Functions of Female Madness and Feminized Liminality in Jane Eyre, Wuthering Heights, and The Yellow Wallpaper. State University of New York at Albany.

Richard, C. 1971. The Brontës, or Myth Domesticated. In Jane Eyre, edited by Richard J. Dunn. New York: Norton.

Roberts, C., D. Roberts, and D. Bisson. 2016. A History of England, Volume 2: 1688 to the Present. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315509617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315509617

Spivak, G. C. 2014. Three Women’s Texts and a Critique of Imperialism. In Postcolonial Criticism. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1086/448328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315843452-6

Talairach-Vielmas, L. 2009. “‘Portrait of a Governess, Disconnected, Poor, and Plain’: Staging the Spectral Self in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre.” Brontë Studies 34 (2): 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1179/147489309X431584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/147489309X431584

Taylor, C. 2017. Foucault on Freedom and Truth. In Michel Foucault. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315249032-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315249032-7

Tryniecka, A. 2023. Women’s Literary Portraits in the Victorian and Neo-Victorian Novel: An Intertextual Study. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

Urteaga, C. 2023. I Am Not an Angel: Contested Identity in Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre. Theses and Dissertations, Texas A&M International University. https://rio.tamiu.edu/etds/199.

Wang, M. A. 2002. Foucault’s Boundaries. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.

Wood, D. M. 2016. Beyond the Panopticon? Foucault and Surveillance Studies. In Space, Knowledge, and Power. London: Routledge.

Wu, Z. 2008. Spatial Theory and Literary Representation. Lanzhou: Gansu People’s Publishing House.

Wyatt, J. 1985. “A Patriarch of One’s Own: Jane Eyre and Romantic Love.” Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature 4 (2): 199–216. https://doi.org/10.2307/463696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/463696