Unravelling Masculinity: Affect, Vulnerability and Melancholy in Nthikeng Mohlele’s Rusty Bell (2014)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/1753-5387/20099Keywords:
Nthikeng Mohlele, Rusty Bell, masculinity studies, affect theory, vulnerabilityAbstract
This article offers a close reading of Nthikeng Mohlele’s Rusty Bell (2014) from the perspective of masculinity studies and affect theory. Concentrating on the life of an upper-middle-class lawyer, Michael, Mohlele’s novel describes the psychological and moral crisis he faces as he tries to negotiate a place for himself within the existing social structures, specifically the family. Confronted with this task, Michael struggles with a sense of vulnerability that manifests itself most acutely in his interactions with others, particularly his wife, Rusty Bell, and his close friend, Christopher “Columbus” Wentzel. This article explores the close connection between emotional closeness and vulnerability, and indicates that intimacy can undermine rather than consolidate the self, including one’s gender identity. In Mohlele’s novel, intimacy, understood as physical closeness, is associated with emotional entrapment, which has its origins in Michael’s traumatic experience of sexual abuse. Equally importantly, intimacy is also bound with a profound feeling of sadness after the premature death of Michael’s friend. Following Judith Butler, I discuss this sadness as regards gender melancholy, which Michael experiences as he mourns the loss of his homosocial relationship with Columbus. The analysis of Mohlele’s novel is based on Lauren Berlant’s insights into intimacy, focusing on its failure to stabilise socially sanctioned forms of closeness. I also draw upon Todd Reeser’s approach to affect as a force capable of both composing and decomposing masculinity. By offering the first sustained critical discussion of Rusty Bell, this article aims to contribute to a wider debate on Black masculinities in post-apartheid literature.
References
Ammann, C., and S. Staudacher. 2021. “Masculinities in Africa Beyond Crisis: Complexity, Fluidity, and Intersectionality.” Gender, Place & Culture 28 (6): 759–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2020.1846019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2020.1846019
Berlant, L. 1998. “Intimacy: A Special Issue.” Critical Inquiry 24 (2): 281–8. https://doi.org/10.1086/448875. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448875
Butler, J. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503616295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503616295
Clough, P. T. 2007. “Introduction.” In The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social, edited by P. T. Clough. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11316pw
Crous, M. 2007. “On Men and Masculinity in Phaswane Mpe’s Welcome to Our Hillbrow and K. Sello Duiker’s The Quiet Violence of Dreams.” Journal of Literary Studies 23 (1): 16–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02564710701399105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02564710701399105
Demir, D., and O. Moreillon. 2023. “In Conversation with Nthikeng Mohlele.” In Tracing the (Post)Apartheid Novel Beyond 2000, edited by D. Demir and O. Moreillon. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032632247-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032632247-8
Freud, S. 2009. “On Mourning and Melancholia.” In On Freud’s “Mourning and Melancholia,” edited by L. G. Fiorini, T. Bokanowski and S. Lewkowicz. Karnac Books.
Mohlele, N. 2014. Rusty Bell. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
Morrell, R. 2006. “Fathers, Fatherhood and Masculinity in South Africa.” In Baba: Men and Fatherhood in South Africa, edited by L. Richter and R. Morrell. HSRC Press.
Mpe, P. 2014. Welcome to Our Hillbrow. Pan Macmillan. https://www.panmacmillan.co.za/authors/phaswane-mpe/welcome-to-our-hillbrow/9781770104051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822377450-101
Ratele, K. 2022. Why Men Hurt Women and Other Reflections on Love, Violence and Masculinity. Wits University Press. https://doi.org/10.18772/12022097632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18772/12022097632
Reeser, T. W. 2017. “Theorizing the Masculinity of Affect.” In Masculinities and Literary Studies: Intersections and New Directions, edited by J. M. Armengol, M. Bosch-Vilarrubias, À. Carabí and T. Requena-Pelegrí. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315230733-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315230733-11
Reeser, T., and L. Gottzén. 2018. “Masculinity and Affect: New Possibilities, New Agendas.” Norma: International Journal for Masculinity Studies 13 (3–4): 145–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2018.1528722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2018.1528722
Sedgwick, E. K. 1985. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/sedg90478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/sedg90478
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marek Pawlicki

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.