Writing Literary History in Southern Africa. The Relevance of a Social Theory

Authors

Abstract

The article suggests a paradigm for the historiographical understanding of the several culturally distinct but interrelated literatures of southern Africa. Instead of regarding the literatures as discrete linguistic-ethnic entities, the comparative approach contextualised within the functioning of society questions conventional boundaries of language, race and genre. In seeking to delineate a "single story", translation refers broadly to the activity of making the insights of one culture accessible to the other, the aim being to respect difference while identifying points of common concern in a democratic enterprise.

Opsomming
Die artikel bied 'n paradigms vir die historiografiese verstaan van die verskillende kultureel-onderskeie, dog onderling verbonde, letterkundes van Suider-Afrika. In plaas daarvan om die letterkundes as afsonderlike linguisties-etniese entiteite te beskou, bevraagteken die vergelykende benadering binne die konteks van maatskaplike funksio­nering die gewone grense van taal, ras en genre. In die poging om 'n "enkelverhaal" te beskryf, beteken "vertaling" rofweg die toeganklik maak van een kultuur se insigte vir 'n ander, met die doel om verskil te eerbiedig terwyl dit gemeenskaplike belange uitwys as deel van 'n demokratiserende onderneming.

Author Biography

Michael Chapman, University of KwaZulu-Natal

Michael Chapman is a professor and the Dean of Humanities at the University of Natal, Durban. He has published extensively on South African literature and recently completed a literary history due to be published early in 1996, South African Literatures.

Downloads

Published

1994-12-01

How to Cite

Chapman, Michael. 1994. “Writing Literary History in Southern Africa. The Relevance of a Social Theory”. Journal of Literary Studies 10 (3/4):13 pages. https://unisapressjournals.co.za/index.php/jls/article/view/22634.

Issue

Section

Themed Section 1