ASSESSING VERBAL FUNCTIONING IN SOUTH AFRICAN SCHOOL BEGINNERS FROM DIVERSE SOCIOECONOMIC BACKGROUNDS: A COMPARISON BETWEEN VERBAL WORKING MEMORY AND VOCABULARY MEASURES

Authors

  • Kate Cockcroft University of the Witwatersrand
  • Lauren Bloch University of the Witwatersrand, Psychology Johannesburg, ZA
  • Azra Moolla University of the Witwatersrand, Psychology Johannesburg, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2016/559

Keywords:

psychoeducational assessment, socioeconomic status, vocabulary, working memory

Abstract

This study investigated whether measures of verbal working memory are less sensitive to children’s socioeconomic background than traditional vocabulary measures. Participants were 120 school beginners, divided into high and low socioeconomic groups. The groups contained equal numbers of English first-language and second-language speakers. All were being educated in English. The results suggest that socioeconomic status accounts for considerable variance in vocabulary measures, while it explains only very small amounts of variance in working memory measures. In addition, the high socioeconomic group performed significantly better on the two vocabulary tests relative to the low socioeconomic group, while there were no significant differences between the groups on all but one of the four working memory tests. Working memory assessments appear to be less influenced by environmental factors and may constitute fairer forms of evaluation for children from differing socioeconomic backgrounds. As such, working memory measures may be a valuable supplement to psychoeducational assessment batteries.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2016-02-22

How to Cite

Cockcroft, Kate, Lauren Bloch, and Azra Moolla. 2016. “ASSESSING VERBAL FUNCTIONING IN SOUTH AFRICAN SCHOOL BEGINNERS FROM DIVERSE SOCIOECONOMIC BACKGROUNDS: A COMPARISON BETWEEN VERBAL WORKING MEMORY AND VOCABULARY MEASURES”. Education As Change 20 (1):199-215. https://doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2016/559.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2015-11-05
Accepted 2015-11-05
Published 2016-02-22