Opportunity and the Pandemic: Re-imagining Business Management Curriculum for First-generation Students under Cover of Pandemonium

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/10991

Keywords:

first-generation students, management studies curriculum, proximal processes, instructional design

Abstract

First-generation university students negotiate with clear and evident difficulty the transition from the familiarity of secondary (high school) education to tertiary (university) education. The impersonal nature of tertiary education generally—and particularly so since the pandemic advent—accentuates marginalisation of vulnerable youth and impinges on effective learning and a favourable learning experience. A more desirable state would include demystification of the processes of becoming a student-customer, firstly, and thereafter a learner-initiate. Teaching faculty, in the (necessarily virtual) classroom, serve as the user-interface with the impersonal and often impenetrable administrative and teaching dimensions of the university exosystem. The rationale is that, were the pathway from high school graduate to student-customer and learner-initiate to be less harrowing, the transition would be more composed and the journey to degree completion more gratifying. Scaffolding this rationale as a reconceptualised first-year management studies curriculum draws upon Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological model of learner development, and the foundations established by Vygotsky’s socio-cultural model of learning. In this frame, proximal processes arising as learner interaction with microsystem and exosystem dimensions of socio-economic and socio-cultural inheritance, can be addressed in the classroom to transcend learner disaffection. An entry-level management principles curriculum delivered to a substantial cohort in the second semester of 2021 served as object of phenomenological observation and interpretation. The student-experience pathway was emphasised as instructor-directed, student-focused and compensatory. Two foci are brought to the fore in this paper, rendering the curriculum content accessible for the student profile, and overcoming assessment helplessness and despondency. These accomplishments are elaborated as features of backwards design and emphasis on teaching and learning as social interaction with a more knowledgeable other.

References

Bronfenbrenner, Urie, and Gary Evans. 2000. “Developmental Science in the 21st Century: Emerging Questions, Theoretical Models, Research Designs and Empirical Findings.” Social Development 9 (1): 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00114

Bronfenbrenner, Urie, and Pamela Morris. 1998. “The Ecology of Developmental Processes.” In Handbook of Child Psychology: Theoretical Models of Human Development, 5th edition, Vol. 1, 993–1028, edited by W. Damon (Series Ed.), and R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.). New York: John Wiley.

Chandler, Paul, and John Sweller. 1991. “Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction.” Cognition and Instruction 8 (4): 293–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2

Chetty, Raj, John Friedman, Nathaniel Hendren, and Michael Stepner. 2020. How Did Covid-19 and Stabilization Policies Affect Spending and Employment? A New Real-time Economic Tracker Based on Private Sector Data. National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Cooper, Graham. 1990. “Cognitive Load Theory as an Aid for Instructional Design.” Australian Journal of Educational Technology 6 (2): 108–113. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet6/cooper.html. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2322

DELVE Initiative. 2020. “Balancing the Risks of Pupils Returning to Schools.” DELVE Report No. 4, Royal Society DELVE Initiative, London.

Gagné, Robert, and David Merrill. 1990. “Integrative Goals for Instructional Design.” Educational Technology Research and Development 38: 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298245

Galina, Ben. 2016. “Teaching First-generation College Students.” Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Accessed March 24, 2022. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/teaching-first-generation-college-students/.

Gluchman, Vasil. 2018. “Nussbaum’s Philosophy of Education as the Foundation for Human Development.” Human Affairs 28: 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0026

Gray, Brendan. 2017. “Don’t Touch Me on My Discipline! Decolonisation, Disciplinarity and the Problem of Curricular Coherence.” Design Education Forum of Southern Africa. 14th National Design Education Conference 2017.

Griesel, Hanlie, and Ben Parker. 2008. Graduate Attributes: A Baseline Study on South African Graduates from the Perspective of Employers. Higher Education South Africa and the South African Qualifications Authority.

Heymann, L., and R. Carolissen. 2011. “The Concept of ‘First-generation Student’ in the Literature: Implications for South African Higher Education.” SAJHE 25 (7): 1378–1396. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC121400.

McLeod, Saul. 2018. “Lev Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory of Cognitive Development.” In Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html.

Merçon-Vargas, Elisa Avellar, Rebeca Fernandes Ferreira Lima, Edinete Maria Rosa, and Jonathan Tudge. 2020. “Processing Proximal Processes: What Bronfenbrenner Meant, What He Didn’t Mean, and What He Should Have Meant.” Journal of Family Theory and Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12373

Nussbaum, M. C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286

Nussbaum, M. C. 2009. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, 3rd edition. Princeton, NJ, Oxford: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831944

OECD. 2010. PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming Social Background: Equity in Learning Opportunities and Outcomes, Volume II. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091504-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091504-en

South African Survey of Student Engagement (SASSE). 2014. Institutional Report 2014. University of KwaZulu-Natal. Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of the Free State.

South African Survey of Student Engagement (SASSE). 2021. Institutional Report 2021. University of KwaZulu-Natal. Centre for Teaching and Learning, University of the Free State.

Snell, Theron P. 2008. “First-generation Students, Social Class, and Literacy.” Academe 94 (4) (July–August): 28–31. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40253218.

Tudge, Jonathan. 2008. “A teoria de Urie Bronfenbrenner: Uma teoria contextualista?” In Família e educação: Olhares da psicologia, 209–231, edited by L. V. C. Moreira and A. M. A. Carvalho. São Paulo, Brazil: Paulinas.

Universities South Africa (USAf). 2018. Understanding Students: A Key to Systemic Success. Issue 1. Universities South Africa.

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wass, Rob, Tony Harland, and Alison Mercer. 2011. “Scaffolding Critical Thinking in the Zone of Proximal Development.” Higher Education Research and Development 30 (3): 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.489237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.489237

Wiggins, Grant, and Jay McTighe. 2005. Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Virginia, USA.

Wong, Harry K., and Rosemary T. Wong. 2018. The First Days of School: How to Be an Effective Teacher, 5th edition. Harry K. Wong Publications.

Yorke, M., and P. T. Knight. 2006. Embedding Employability into the Curriculum. York: The Higher Education Academy.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-16

How to Cite

Engelbrecht, Doug. 2022. “Opportunity and the Pandemic: Re-Imagining Business Management Curriculum for First-Generation Students under Cover of Pandemonium”. Progressio 43:18 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/10991.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2022-03-25
Accepted 2022-08-26
Published 2022-11-16