USE OF INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS AS PART OF A BLENDED LEARNING ENVIRONMENT: NOT AS WHITE AS IT SEEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8853/574Abstract
Interactive whiteboards (IWBs) have become an essential technological medium of instruction, especially in distance education (DE), enabling interaction between lecturers and students over vast distances. Efficient utilisation of IWBs has the potential to enhance teaching and learning in a blended environment. This article focuses on the perceptions of members of the school management team (SMT) pertaining to their first experiences with IWBs as part of a blended learning environment. Although the students were adult learners, and leaders in education, it cannot be presumed that these students undergoing professional development via IWB are ready and open towards lecturers using such a medium of instruction. Open-ended questionnaires were completed by 50 students enrolled for the Advanced Certificate in Education: School Management and Leadership (ACE SL). Participants’ mixed experiences led to factors being identified that need to be addressed before and during the IWB session, for the optimal interactive and cooperative teaching and learning experience. This article makes recommendations to improve IWB sessions and indicates the importance of a sound and reliable technological environment for the effective use of IWBs as part of a blended learning environment.Â
References
Beauchamp, G. 2004. Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: Towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 13(3): 327−348.
Becta. 2003. What the research says about interactive whiteboards. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5318/1/wtrs_whiteboards.pdf (accessed 15 March 2015).
Bennet, S. and L. Lockyer. 2008. A study of teachers’ integration of interactive whiteboards into four Australian primary school classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology 33(4): 289−300.
Betcher, C. and M. Lee. 2009. The intercative whiteboard revolution − teaching with IWBs. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
Bogdan, R. C. and S. K. Biklen. 2006. Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theories and methods. (5th ed). Boston: Pearson.
Bubb, S. and P. Early. 2007. Leading and managing continuing professional development. (2nd ed). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Bush, T. 2007. Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy and practice. South African Journal of Education 27(3): 391−406.
Cameron, L. 2013. Giving teaching advice meaning: The importance of contextualizing pedagogical instruction within the discipline. In Outlooks and opportunities in blende and distance learning, ed. B. Tynan, J. Willems and R. James. United States of America: IGI Global.
Chapman, J. D. 2005. Recuitement, retention and development of school principals. http://www.unesco.org/iiep (accessed 10 July 2014).
Cogill, J. 2003. The use of interactive whiteboards in the primary school: Effects on pedagogy. In ICT in schools research and evaluation series, edited by Becta. London: Queen’s Printer.
Cohen, L., L. Manion and K. Morrison. 2011. Research methods in education. (7th ed). London: Routledge.
Cragg, C. E., J. Dunning and J. Ellis. 2008. Teacher and student behaviors in face-to-face and online courses: Dealing with complex concepts. Journal of Distance Education 22(3): 115−128.
Esterhuizen, H. D. 2012. The intergration of learning teachnology in open distance learning at the North-West University. North-West: North-West University.
Fraenkel, J. R. and N. E. Wallen. 2008. How to design and evaluate research in education. (7th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Francois, E. J. 2013. Quality matters in transcultural blended learning and teaching in postsecondary education: A conceptional framework. In Transcultural blended learning and teaching in postsecondary education, ed. E. J. Francois. United States of America: IGI Global.
Garrison, D. R. and N. D. Vaughan. 2008. Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and gudelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gillen, J., J. K. Staarman, K. Littleton, N. Mercer and A. Twiner. 2006. A ‘learning revolution’? Investigating pedagogic pratices around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms. http://oro.open.ac.uk/9866/2/IWB-09_final_edit_SK.pdf (accessed 23 March 2014).
Glover, D. and D. Miller. 2007. The evalution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using interactive whiteboards in mathematics and modern languages: an empirica; analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media and Technology 32(1): 5−20.
Griswold, W. 2013. Transformative learning and educational technology integration in a post-totalitarian context: Professional development among school teachers in rural Siberia, Russia. In Transcultural blended learning and teaching in postsecondary education, ed. E. J. Francois. United States of America: IGI Global.
Hadjerrouit, S. 2008. Towards a blended learning model for teaching and learning computer programming: A case study. Informatics in Education 7(2): 181−210.
Hall, I. and S. Higgins. 2005. Primary school students’ perceptions of interactivewhiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21: 102−117.
Hayes, T. 2010. Interactive whiteboards for teaching training. http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/handle/10125/15398/Hayes_lit_review.pdf?sequence=3 (accessed 9 February 2014).
Heinze, A. and C. Procter. 2012. Refining current practices in mobile and blended learning, ed. D. Parsons. United States of America: IGI Global.
Jang, S.-J. 2010. Integrating the interactive whiteboard and peer coaching to develop the TPACK of secondary science teachers. Computers and Education 55: 1744−1751.
Jansen, J. D. 2010. The language of research. In First steps in research, ed. K. Maree. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
Kennewell, S. and G. Beauchamp. 2007. The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology 32(3): 227−241.
Kennewell, S., S. Tanner, S. Jones and G. Beauchamp. 2008. Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24: 61−73.
King, K. P. 2002. Keeping pace with technology: Educational technology that transforms: Vol 1. The challenges and promise for K-12 educators. New York: Hampton Press, Inc.
Kumar, R. 2008. Convergence of ICT and education. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (4). http://waset.org/publications/3700/convergence-of-ict-and-education (accessed 5 April 2014).
Manny-Ikan, E., O. Dagan, T. B. Tikochinski and R. Zorman. 2011. Using the interactive white board in teaching and learning − an evaluation of the smart classroom pilot project. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects 7: 249−273.
Maree, K. and J. Pietersen. 2010. Surveys and the use of questionnaires. In First steps in research, ed. K. Maree. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
Mercer, N., S. Hennessy and P. Warwick. 2010. Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 19(2): 195−209.
Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Morrison, M. 2007. What do we mean by educational research? In Research methods in educational leadership and management, ed. A. R. J. Briggs and M. Coleman: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Ngcobo, T. 2012. Leadership development challenges in South African schools: The advanced certificate: Education (school management and leadership). Africa Education Review 9(3): 417−433.
Nieuwenhuis, J. 2007. Introducing qualitative research. In First steps in research, ed. K. Maree. Pietermaritzburg: Van Schaik Publishers.
North-West University. 2015. Calender 2015, edited by North-West University.
Okita, S. Y. 2013. Educational technology and instructional design in synchronous blended learning environments. In Transculture blended learning and teaching in postsecondary education, ed. E. J. Francois. United States of America: IGI Global.
Pashiardis, P. and S. Brauckmann. 2009. Professional development needs for school principals. Common Wealth Partnership. http://www.cedol.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/41-46-2010.pdf (accessed 23 November 2013).
Pool, J. 2014. An investigation of communities of inquiry within a blended mode of delivery for technology education. Potchefstroom: North-West University.
Rafferty, J. M., J. Munday and J. Buchan. 2013. Ten rules of thumb in blended and felxible learning: A study on pedagogies, challenges, and changing perspectives. In Outlooks and opportunities in blended and distance learning, ed. B. Tynan, J. Willems and R. James. United States of America: IGI Global.
Ritchie, J. and J. Lewis. 2003. Qualitative research practice. A guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications.
SACE. 2013/14. Annual report 2013/14, edited by Department of Educaton. Centurion: South African Council for Educators.
Smith, H. J., S. Higgins, K. Wall and J. Miller. 2005. Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21: 91−101.
Swan, K., A. Kratcoski, J. Schenker and M. Van-’t Hooft. 2010. Interactive whireboards and student achievement. In Interactive whiteboards for education: theory, research and practice, ed. M. Thomas and E. C. Schmid. United States of America: IGI Global.
Thomas, G. E. 2013. Facilitating learning with adult students in the transcultural classroom. In Transcultural blended learning and teaching in postsecondary education, ed. E. J. Francois. United States of America: IGI Global.
Tucker, C. R. 2012. Blended learning in grades 4−12. United States of America: Corwin.
Turel, Y. K. and T. E. Johnson. 2012. Teachers’ belief and use of interactive whiteboards for teaching and learning. Educational Technology & Society 15(1): 381−394.
Virtual Learning. 2014. Interactive whiteboards case studies: New tools, new pedagogies, new learning? http://virtuallearning.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Case_Studies.pdf (accessed 6 May 2014).
Wei, P., H.-C. and C.-Y. Huang. 2013. Blended lesrning design and teaching strategies: Case of the program planning course. In Transculture blended learning and teaching in postsecondary education, ed. E. J. Francois. United States of America: IGI Global.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2015-11-06
Published 2015-11-06
