STUDENTSâ€™ PERCEPTIONS OF THE USE OF INTERACTIVE WHITE BOARDS IN THE DELIVERY OF DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAMMES

M H Combrinck; E J Spamer; M van Zyl

doi:10.25159/0256-8853/575

Authors

M H Combrinck Unit for Open Distance Learning, North-West University, South Africa
E J Spamer Unit for Open Distance Learning, North-West University, South Africa
M van Zyl Unit for Open Distance Learning, North-West University, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8853/575

Keywords:

Open distance learning, Interactive White Boards, Transactional Theory

Abstract

Due to the need for higher education in South Africa, the country experiences a rapid growth in open distance learning, especially in rural areas. Owing to work pressure and financial constraints, people find it difficult to enrol full time at contact universities. The Unit for Open Distance Learning (UODL) at the Potchefstroom campus of the North-West University (NWU), South Africa, was established in 2013, with its main function to deliver open distance learning programmes to 30Â 000 students from the Faculties of Education Sciences, Theology and Health Sciences.Utilising interactive whiteboards (IWBs), the NWU and UODL are now able to deliver lectures to students concurrently at 55 regional open learning centres across Southern Africa, as well as to an unlimited number of individuals with Internet access worldwide. Although IWBs are not new, our initiative is to use them more extensively to create more contact between lecturers and students.To ensure and enhance quality education it is vital to determine studentsâ€™ perceptions on the delivery of programmes by means of IWBs. Thus the aim of the study is to explore studentsâ€™ perceptions of the use of IWBs in the delivery of programmes.Â

References

Belawati, T. and A. Zuhairi. 2007. The practice of a quality assurance system in open and distance learning: A case study at Universitas Terbuka Indonesia. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 8(1): 1âˆ’15.

Bishoff, W. R., S. Bisconer, B. Kooker and L. Woods. 1996. Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. The American Journal of Distance Education 10(3): 4âˆ’19.

Burgess, J. V. 2006. Transactional distance theory and student satisfaction with web-based distance learning courses. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of West Florida.

Falloon, G. 2011. Making the connection: Mooreâ€™s theory of transactional distance and its relevance to the use of a virtual classroom in postgraduate online teacher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 43(3): 187âˆ’209.

Gorsky, P. and A. Caspi. 2005. A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 6(1): 1âˆ’11.

Gous, I. and J. Roberts. 2013. Breaking the sound barrier: Using technology to bridge the divide between lecturer and student in an ODL setting. In Education across space and time: Meeting the diverse needs of the distance learner, ed. R. Sims and M. Kigotho, 35âˆ’46. Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia (ODLAA).

Harman, G. 1998. Quality assurance mechanisms and their use as policy instruments: Major international approaches and the Australian experience since 1993. European Journal of Education 33(3): 331âˆ’348.

Higgings, S., G. Beauchamp, G. and D. J. Miller, 2007. Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboard. Learning, Media and Technology 32(3): 213âˆ’225.

Jung, I. S. 2004. Quality assurance and accreditation mechanisms of distance education for higher education in the Asia-Pacific Region. Five selected cases. A paper presented at the UNESCO workshop, 20 March 2004, Beijing, China.

Miller, D. J. and D. Glover, 2007. Into the unknown: The professional development induction experience of secondary mathematics teachers using interactive whiteboard technology. Learning, Media and Technology 32(3): 319âˆ’331.

Mohakud, L. L., R. L. Mohapatra and S. K. Behera, 2012. Encouraging higher education through open and distance learning: Some aspects. Turkish online Journal of Distance Education 13(4): 1âˆ’8.

Moore, M. 1997. Theory of transactional distance. In Theoretical principles of distance education, ed. D. Keegan. New York: Routledge.

Moore, M. and G. Kearsley. 1996. Distance education: A systems review. Belmont: Wadsworth.

Nage-Sibande, B., W. J. van Vollenhoven and J. Hendrikz. 2011. ODL and access to higher education: The experience of the University of Botswana. Progressio 33(1): 138âˆ’154.

Tapfumaneyi, K. D. K. 2013. Teaching challenges on open and distance learning in Africa: A critical analysis of the transition from conventional teaching to ODL teaching. International Journal of Advanced Research 1(5): 543âˆ’548.

Turel, Y. K. 2010. Developing teachersâ€™ utilization of interactive white boards. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2010, ed. D. Gibson and B. Dodge. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Turel, Y. K. and T. E. Johnson. 2012. Teachersâ€™ belief and use of interactive whiteboards for teaching and learning. Educational Technology and Society 15(1): 381âˆ’394.

Van Zyl, J. M., C. J. Els and A. S. Blignaut. 2013. Development of ODL in a newly industrialized country according to face-to-ace contact, ICT, and E-readiness. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 14(1): 84âˆ’105.