SOUTH AFRICA, TANZANIA AND FINLAND: MATHEMATICS TEACHER-STUDENTS’ OPINIONS ABOUT INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8853/576Abstract
Low achievement in Mathematics at school level and during higher education remains a problem not only in South Africa but also worldwide. Information and Communication Technology provides endless opportunities to enhance the teaching and learning of Mathematics. The purpose of this study was to determine and compare teacher-students’ attitudes to Mathematics and ICT in order to plan for efficient, effective and appropriate methods in Mathematics education. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design, comprising a single mode research questionnaire, was distributed to groups of Mathematics teacher-students in South Africa, Tanzania and Finland. Descriptive statistical techniques, reliability and validity of the instrument scale, inferential statistics (ANOVA), and cross-tabulations were used and, where appropriate, effect sizes were calculated. A comparison of the perspectives revealed that the South African and Tanzanian teacher-students had a more positive perspective on ICT than the Finnish students. The teacher-students in the two African countries were also more willing to use ICT than the students in Finland, despite the latter’s increased exposure and access to technology. Future research should be done to determine the appropriate types of technology to enhance teaching and learning as well as teacher-students’ experiences regarding the use of technology in Mathematics education.
References
Albirini, A. 2006. Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers and Education 47: 373−398.
Andrews, P., A. Ryve, K. Hemmi and J. Sayers. 2014. PISA, TIMSS and Finnish mathematics teaching: An enigma in search of an explanation. Educational Studies in Mathematics 87: 7−26.
Anthony, L. M., M. C. Clarke and S. J. Anderson. 2000. Technophobia and personality subtypes in a sample of South African university students. Computers in Human Behaviour 16: 31−44.
Beldarrain, Y. 2006. Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education 27(2): 139−153.
Bennison, A. and M. Goos. 2010. Learning to teach mathematics with technology: A survey of professional development needs, experiences and impacts. Mathematics Education Research Journal 22(1): 31−56.
Burrell, G. and G. Morgan. 1994. Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
DBE see Department of Basic Education.
Department of Basic Education. 2011. Report on the National Senior Certificate examination 2011 technical report. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
Department of Basic Education. 2013. Report on the Annual National Assessment of 2013: Grades 1 to 6 and 9. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
Esterhuizen, H. D. 2012. The integration of learning technologies in open distance learning at the North-West University. Potchefstroom: North-West University.
Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Fraenkel, J. R. and N. E. Wallen. 2003. How to design and evaluate research in education. (5th ed). Ed. M. Hill. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Francis, L. J., Y. J. Katz and S. H. Jones. 2000. The reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the Computer Attitude Scale. Computers & Education 35: 149−159.
Howie, S. J., A. Muller and A. Paterson. 2005. Information and Communication Technologies in South African Secondary Schools. Cape Town: HSRC Press.
Kennisnet. 2009. Four in balance monitor: ICT in Dutch schools. http://onderzoek.kennisnet.nl/onderzoeken/monitoring/fourinbalance2009 (accessed 17 September 2010).
Laddunuri, M. M. 2012. Status of school education in present Tanzania and emerging issues. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology 3(1): 15−20.
Lantz-Andersson, A., J. Linderoth and R. Säljö. 2009. What’s the problem? Meaning making and learning to do mathematical word problems in the context of digital tools. Instructional Science 37: 325−343.
Loyd, B. H. and C. Gressard. 1984. Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 44: 501−505.
Mishra, P. and M. J. Koehler. 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6): 1017−1054.
Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, E. J. Gonzalez and S. J. Chrostowski. 2003. TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report. Chestnut Hill: Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Neuman, W. L. 1997. Social research methods qualitative and quantitative approaches. (3rd ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Niemi, H. and R. Jakku-Sihvonen. 2011. Teacher education in Finland. In European dimensions of teacher education − Similarities and differences, ed. M. V. Zuljan and J. Vogrinc. Ljubljana: The Faculty of education: The National School of Leadership and Education.
Niess, M. L. 2005. Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education 21: 509−523.
Ottestad, G. 2010. Innovative pedagogical practice with ICT in three Nordic countries − differences and similarities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26: 478−491.
Pamuk, S. and D. Peker. 2009. Turkish pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ computer related self-efficacies, attitudes, and the relationship between the variables. Computers & Education 53: 454−461.
Pietersen, J. and K. Maree. 2007. Standardisation of a questionnaire. In First steps in research, ed. K. Maree. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Rivkin, S. G., E. A. Hanushek and J. F. Kain. 2005. Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica 73(2): 417−458.
Shulman, L. S. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57(1): 1−22.
Singh, K., M. Granville and S. Dika. 2002. Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal or Educational Research 95(2): 323−332.
Sutinen, E. and M. Vesisenaho. 2006. Ethnocomputing in Tanzania: Design and analysis of a contextualized ICT course. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 1(3): 239−267.
Thatcher, A. 2008. Web search strategies: The influence of Web experience and task type. Information Processing and Management 44: 1308−1329.
Tondeur, J., J. van Braak and M. Valcke. 2007. Curricula and the use of ICT in education: Two worlds apart? British Journal of Educational Technology 38(6): 962−976.
Van der Walt, B. J. 1997. Afrocentric or eurocentric? Our calling in a multi-cultural South Africa. Potchefstroom: Potchefstroom University of Christian Higher Education.
Van Zyl, J. M., C. J. Els and A. S. Blignaut. 2013. Development of ODL in a newly industrialized country according to face-to-face contact, ICT, and e-readiness. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 14(1): 84−105.
Yushau, B., A. Mji and D. C. J. Wessels. 2005. The role of technology in fostering creativity in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Pythagoras 62: 12−22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2015-11-06
Published 2015-11-06
