Open Access Publishing and University Researchers’ Agency Towards Reshaping the Publishing Habitus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/11390Keywords:
open access publishing, university researcher, habitus, agencyAbstract
Drawing on Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus, this qualitative study adopted a multiple-case design to investigate how university researchers exercised their agency as they engaged in actions of open access publishing, and how such actions influenced the researchers themselves and the university as an institution. Guided by a four-dimensional approach to agency as the conceptual framework, the study unveiled the complex processes by which university researchers played agentic roles in open access publishing and reshaped their own publishing habitus. They utilised various kinds of personal and social resources to mediate their agentic actions for the purpose of producing intended outcomes as institutionally recognised achievement. As their agentic actions influenced the university as institutional structure in terms of policy reformulation, they also reshaped university researchers’ habitus in an incremental manner as their habitus was augmented to include a new form of recognised action. The study also revealed the duality of discourse, which, conforming to institutionality, both enabled and constrained researchers’ agentic actions.
Metrics
References
Ahearn, L. M. 2001. “Language and Agency”. Annual Review of Anthropology 30 (1): 109–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
Bandura, A. 2001. “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective”. Annual Review of Psychology 52 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. Réponses. Vol. 4. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Bowen, N. E. J. A., N. Satienchayakorn, M. Teedaaksornsakul, and N. Thomas. 2021. “Legitimising Teacher Identity: Investment and Agency from an Ecological Perspective”. Teaching and Teacher Education 108: 103519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103519
Bufrem, L. S. 2009. “University Publishing Policy: A Criticism for the Practice”. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação 14 (1): 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362009000100003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362009000100003
Chahal, D., J. M. Rodriguez, and B. Schneider. 2019. “‘The Rules above the Bed’: Academic Language and Learning as Hospitality”. Higher Education Research and Development 38 (5): 893–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1609915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1609915
Dai, K., B. Lingard, and R. P. Musofer. 2020. “Mobile Chinese Students Navigating Between Fields: (Trans)forming Habitus in Transnational Articulation Programmes?” Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (12): 1329–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1689813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1689813
Davies, B. 1990. “Agency as a Form of Discursive Practice: A Classroom Scene Observed”. British Journal of Sociology of Education 11 (3): 341–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569900110306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569900110306
Eaton, S. E., and J. C. Hughes, eds. 2022. Academic Integrity in Canada: An Enduring and Essential Challenge. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1
Eteläpelto, A., K. Vähäsantanen, P. Hökkä, and S. Paloniemi. 2013. “What Is Agency? Conceptualizing Professional Agency at Work”. Educational Research Review 10: 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
Fuentes, R., and I. Gómez Soler. 2018. “Foreign Language Faculty’s Appropriation of an Academic Publishing Policy at a US University”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39 (3): 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1344243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1344243
Gao, X., and Y. Zheng. 2020. “‘Heavy Mountains’ for Chinese Humanities and Social Science Academics in the Quest for World-Class Universities”. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 50 (4): 554–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1538770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1538770
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press.
Hinostroza-Paredes, Y. 2021. “Reflexivity and Agency in University-Based Teacher Educators: A Critical Realist Analysis”. Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1943651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1943651
Holquist, S. E., and J. Walls. 2021. “Power and Adult Support in Student Voice Efforts for Policy Change”. Educational Policy 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211029027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211029027
Holsapple, C. W. 2008. “A Publication Power Approach for Identifying Premier Information Systems Journals”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59 (2): 166–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20679
Huang, C.-K., C. Neylon, R. Hosking, L. Montgomery, K. S. Wilson, A. Ozaygen, and C. Brookes-Kenworthy. 2020. “Meta-Research: Evaluating the Impact of Open Access Policies on Research Institutions”. eLife 9: e57067. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57067
Hyland, K. 2015. Academic Publishing: Issues and Challenges in the Construction of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jeater, D. 2018. “Academic Standards or Academic Imperialism? Zimbabwean Perceptions of Hegemonic Power in the Global Construction of Knowledge”. African Studies Review 61 (2): 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2017.132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2017.132
Jin, J., and S. J. Ball. 2021. “Precarious Success and the Conspiracy of Reflexivity: Questioning the ‘Habitus Transformation’ of Working-Class Students at Elite Universities”. Critical Studies in Education 62 (5): 608–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1593869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1593869
Johnson, K. E., and P. R. Golombek, eds. 2002. Teachers’ Narrative Inquiry as Professional Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, H., and K. Lee. 2013. “Publish (in International Indexed Journals) or Perish: Neoliberal Ideology in a Korean University”. Language Policy 12 (3): 215–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9267-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9267-2
Li, J., and E. Xue. 2021. Creating World-Class Universities in China: Ideas, Policies, and Efforts. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6726-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6726-8
Li, W, and P. I. De Costa. 2021. “Problematizing Enterprise Culture in Global Academic Publishing: Linguistic Entrepreneurship through the Lens of Two Chinese Visiting Scholars in a U.S. University”. Multilingua 40 (2): 225–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0036
Lu, H., and X. Zhang. 2021. “Emotional Responses Toward a New Research Policy among Academics in a Chinese University”. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 777472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.777472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.777472
Ma, J., and Y. Cai. 2021. “Innovations in an Institutionalised Higher Education System: The Role of Embedded Agency”. Higher Education 82: 897–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00679-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00679-7
Mering, M. 2020. “Open Access Mandates and Policies: The Basics”. In “Special Issue on Accessibility”, edited by J. E. Grogg and H. Rosen, Serials Review 46 (2): 157–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2020.1760707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2020.1760707
Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2020. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Paphitis, S. A., and L. Kelland. 2016. “The University as a Site for Transformation: Developing Civic-Minded Graduates at South African Institutions through an Epistemic Shift in Institutional Culture”. Education as Change 20 (2): 184–203. https://doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2016/906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2016/906
Priestley, M., R. Edwards, A. Priestley, and K. Miller. 2012. “Teacher Agency in Curriculum Making: Agents of Change and Spaces for Manoeuvre”. Curriculum Inquiry 42 (2): 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x
Quan, W., B. Chen, and F. Shu. 2017. “Publish or Impoverish: An Investigation of the Monetary Reward System of Science in China (1999–2016)”. Aslib Journal of Information Management 69 (5): 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-01-2017-0014
Ruan, X., X. Zheng, and A. Toom. 2020. “From Perceived Discrepancies to Intentional Efforts: Understanding English Department Teachers’ Agency in Classroom Instruction in a Changing Curricular Landscape”. Teaching and Teacher Education 92: 103074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103074
Shin, E.-J. 2014. “A Study on APC Subsidy Policies to Encourage OA Publishing”. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management 31 (3): 249–70. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.249
Tao, J., and X. Gao. 2018. “Identity Constructions of ESP Teachers in a Chinese University”. English for Specific Purposes 49: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.09.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.09.003
Tao, J., and X. Gao. 2021. Language Teacher Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108916943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108916943
Tian, M., and G. Lu. 2017. “What Price the Building of World-Class Universities? Academic Pressure Faced by Young Lecturers at a Research-Centered University in China”. Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives 22 (8): 957–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1319814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1319814
Vähäsantanen, K. S. Paloniemi, E. Räikkönen, and P. Hökkä. 2020. “Professional Agency in a University Context: Academic Freedom and Fetters”. Teaching and Teacher Education 89: 103000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103000
Wang, Y., Q. Liu, and R. Chen. 2022. “Comparative Study on the Internal Governance Models of Chinese and European Universities”. Asia Europe Journal 20: 115–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-021-00636-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-021-00636-0
Wustefeld, S. 2018. “Institutional Pedagogy for an Autonomous Society: Castoriadis and Lapassade”. Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (10): 936–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1266923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1266923
Xu, H. 2021. “To be Resourced or to Become a Resource: Understanding Novice University Teachers’ Resource-Mediated Identity Construction”. SAGE Open 11 (2): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211010721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211010721
Yang, H., and M. Clarke. 2018. “Spaces of Agency Within Contextual Constraints: A Case Study of Teacher’s Response to EFL Reform in a Chinese University”. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 38 (2): 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1460252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1460252
Yin, R. K. 2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yuan, R. 2021. “‘Living in Parallel Worlds’: Investigating Teacher Educators’ Academic Publishing Experiences in Two Chinese Universities”. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 51 (6): 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1681260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1681260
Yuan, R., W. Liu, and I. Lee. 2019. “Confrontation, Negotiation and Agency: Exploring the Inner Dynamics of Student Teacher Identity Transformation during Teaching Practicum”. Teachers and Teaching 25 (8): 972–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1688286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1688286
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hao Xu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2022-11-19
Published 2022-12-19