ChatGPT in Secondary Education: A Multi-Theoretical Case Study from a Developing Country

Sanggam Pardede; Dearlina Sinaga; Stevani Simamora

doi:10.25159/1947-9417/20308

Authors

Sanggam Pardede HKBP Nommensen University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2797-3278
Dearlina Sinaga HKBP Nommensen University
Stevani Simamora HKBP Nommensen University https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9540-4604

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/20308

Keywords:

ChatGPT, artificial intelligence, secondary education, learning motivation, teacher mediation

Abstract

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has created opportunities and challenges for secondary education, particularly in resource-constrained contexts. This study examines the integration of ChatGPT in classroom learning through a qualitative instrumental case study conducted in a public secondary school in Indonesia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and focus group discussions involving students, teachers, and school leadership. The findings reveal that ChatGPT is primarily used in concept-driven subjects such as Economics, Indonesian Language, and English, while its application in Mathematics remains limited. Students reported that ChatGPT supports learning efficiency, facilitates conceptual understanding, and enhances confidence in completing academic tasks. However, challenges related to information accuracy, potential dependency, and uncritical use were also identified. Importantly, the study highlights the central role of teacher mediation in shaping responsible and reflective ChatGPT use, particularly through strategies such as verification of ChatGPT-generated content and guided explanation in students’ own words. Based on these findings, the study proposes a teacher-mediated and context-sensitive framework to support pedagogically grounded ChatGPT integration. The study contributes empirical evidence from a Global South context and offers transferable insights for the responsible pedagogical integration of ChatGPT in under-resourced secondary education settings.

References

Aslan, S., M. Alanoğlu, and S. Karabatak. 2025. “Enhancing 21st-Century Teaching Competencies: The Key Role of Digital Literacy in Connecting Pre-Service Teachers’ TPACK”. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251315841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251315841

Bond, M., H. Khosravi, M. De Laat, N. Bergdahl, V. Negrea, E. Oxley, P. Pham, S. Wang Chong, and G. Siemens. 2024. “A Meta Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Call for Increased Ethics, Collaboration, and Rigour”. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 21 (1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z

Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Davis, F. D., and A. Granić. 2024. The Technology Acceptance Model. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45274-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45274-2

Ding, L., T. Li, S. Jiang, and A. Gapud. 2023. “Students’ Perceptions of Using ChatGPT in a Physics Class as a Virtual Tutor”. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20 (1): 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00434-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00434-1

Elkaseh, A. M., K. W. Wong, and C. C. Fung. 2016. “Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness of Social Media for E-Learning in Libyan Higher Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis”. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 6 (3): 192–199. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.683

Government of Indonesia. 2003. Act of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20, Year 2003. [In Bahasa Indonesia.] State Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/details/43920/uu-no-20-tahun-2003.

Hadi Mogavi, R., C. Deng, J. Juho Kim, P. Zhou, Y. D. Kwon, A. H. S. Metwally, A. Tlili, S. Bassanelli, A. Bucchiarone, S. Gujar, L. E. Nacke, and P. Hui. 2024. “ChatGPT in Education: A Blessing or a Curse? A Qualitative Study Exploring Early Adopters’ Utilization and Perceptions”. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 2 (1): 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027

Jauhiainen, J. S., and A. G. Guerra. 2024. “Generative AI and Education: Dynamic Personalization of Pupils’ School Learning Material with ChatGPT”. Frontiers in Education 9 (1): 1288723. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723

Kiryakova, G., and D. Kozhuharova. 2024. “The Digital Competences Necessary for the Successful Pedagogical Practice of Teachers in the Digital Age”. Education Sciences 14 (5): 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050507

Krakowski, S., J. Luger, and S. Raisch. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence and the Changing Sources of Competitive Advantage”. In “New Directions for the Resource‐Based View”, edited by J. Barney, O. Chatain, C. Helfat, A. Kaul, D. Ketchen, and H. Singh, special issue, Strategic Management Journal 44 (6): 1425–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3387

Lameras, P., and S. Arnab. 2021. “Power to the Teachers: An Exploratory Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education”. Information 13 (1): 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010014

Lee, H.-Y., P.-H. Chen, W.-S. Wang, Y.-M. Huang, and T.-T. Wu. 2024. “Empowering ChatGPT with Guidance Mechanism in Blended Learning: Effect of Self-Regulated Learning, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, and Knowledge Construction”. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 21 (1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4

Muawanah, U., A. Marini, and I. Sarifah. 2024. “The Interconnection between Digital Literacy, Artificial Intelligence, and the Use of E-Learning Applications in Enhancing the Sustainability of Regional Languages: Evidence from Indonesia”. Social Sciences and Humanities Open 10: 101169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101169

Oates, A., and D. Johnson. 2025. “ChatGPT in the Classroom: Evaluating Its Role in Fostering Critical Evaluation Skills”. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 35: 1793–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00452-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00452-8

Pardede, S., D. L. Pardede, and L. Pardede. 2025. “Exploring Smartphone Use and Learning Behaviors among Senior High School Students: Insights from a Developing Region in Indonesia”. Open Journal of Educational Research 5 (3): 103–110. https://doi.org/10.31586/ojer.2025.6099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31586/ojer.2025.6099

Razak, H. M., N. A. Razak, and P. Krish. 2022. “Enhancing Students’ Digital Literacy at EFL Classroom: Strategies of Teachers and School Administrators”. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan 41 (3): 653–664. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i3.43107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i3.43107

Rusydiyah, E. F., E. Purwati, and A. Prabowo. 2020. “How to Use Digital Literacy as a Learning Resource for Teacher Candidates in Indonesia”. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan 39 (2): 305–318. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.30551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.30551

Sage, K. 2022. Zone of Proximal Development. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367198459-REPRW163-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367198459-REPRW163-1

Santini, F. de Oliveira, C. Hoffmann Sampaio, T. Rasul, W. J. Ladeira, A. K. Kar, M. G. Perin, and M. Azhar. 2025. “Understanding Students’ Technology Acceptance Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Study”. Technology in Society 81: 102798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102798

Selwyn, N., T. Hillman, A. Bergviken Rensfeldt, and C. Perrotta. 2023. “Digital Technologies and the Automation of Education—Key Questions and Concerns”. Postdigital Science and Education 5 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00263-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00263-3

Seo, K., M. Yoo, S. Dodson, and S.-H. Jin. 2025. “Augmented Teachers: K–12 Teachers’ Needs for Artificial Intelligence’s Complementary Role in Personalized Learning”. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 57 (4): 876–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2330525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2330525

Timotheou, S., O. Miliou, Y. Dimitriadis, S. Villagrá Sobrino, N. Giannoutsou, R. Cachia, A. Martínez Monés, and A. Ioannou. 2023. “Impacts of Digital Technologies on Education and Factors Influencing Schools’ Digital Capacity and Transformation: A Literature Review”. Education and Information Technologies 28 (6): 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Tsamados, A., L. Floridi, and M. Taddeo. 2025. “Human Control of AI Systems: From Supervision to Teaming”. AI and Ethics 5: 1535–1548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00489-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00489-4

Van de Werfhorst, H. G., E. Kessenich, and S. Geven. 2022. “The Digital Divide in Online Education: Inequality in Digital Readiness of Students and Schools”. Computers and Education Open 3: 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100