Whose Intelligence? Whose Music? Critical Reflections on AI in Music Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/20479

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, music education, critical pedagogy, decolonial education, educational equity, digital literacy , cultural politics

Abstract

This commentary critically examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into music education through two guiding questions: Whose intelligence is encoded within these systems? Whose music is legitimised and reproduced through them? While often promoted as neutral and innovative, AI systems are shaped by cultural biases, economic logics, and epistemological assumptions that privilege Western classical and commercial repertoires. In doing so, they risk narrowing definitions of intelligence, standardising musical practices, and reproducing existing inequalities. Drawing on critical pedagogy and decolonial perspectives, the commentary argues that AI in music education should be approached not as a technical solution but as a contested site of knowledge production. It highlights the dangers of epistemic erasure, technocratic pedagogy, and data colonialism, while outlining pathways for transformation: decolonising datasets, cultivating critical digital literacy, reclaiming pedagogy from the logic of efficiency, and fostering alliances across disciplines and communities. By reframing AI as an object of critique and dialogue, this commentary seeks to open possibilities for more inclusive, equitable, and transformative practices in music education.

References

Bryan-Kinns, N., and Z. Li. 2024. “Reducing Barriers to the Use of Marginalised Music Genres in AI”. Preprint, arXiv, July 18. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13439.

Couldry, N., and U. A. Mejias. 2019. “Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject”. Television and New Media 20 (4): 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632

Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Hebert, D. G. 2022. “Editorial Introduction: Global Competence, Decolonization, and Asian Educational Philosophies”. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education 5 (2): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4158

Henry, A., V. Wiratama, A. Afilipoaie, H. Ranaivoson, and E. Arrivé. 2024. “Impacts of AI on Music Consumption and Fairness”. Emerging Media 2 (3): 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543241269047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543241269047

Marták, L. S., P. Hu, and G. Widmer. 2024. “Quantifying the Corpus Bias Problem in Automatic Music Transcription Systems” Preprint, arXiv, August 8. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04737.

Merchán Sánchez-Jara, J. F., S. González Gutiérrez, J. Cruz Rodríguez, and B. Syroyid Syroyid. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Music Education: A Critical Synthesis of Challenges and Opportunities”. Education Sciences 14 (11): 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111171

Shakespeare, D., L. Porcaro, E. Gómez, and C. Castillo. 2020. “Exploring Artist Gender Bias in Music Recommendation”. Preprint, arXiv, September 3, revised October 6, 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.01715.

Shank, D. B., C. Stefanik, C. Stuhlsatz, K. Kacirek, and A. M. Belfi. 2023. “AI Composer Bias: Listeners Like Music Less When They Think It Was Composed by an AI”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3: 676–692. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000447

Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Ma, Jincheng, and Qiang Wan. 2025. “Whose Intelligence? Whose Music? Critical Reflections on AI in Music Education”. Education As Change 29 (October):11 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/20479.

Issue

Section

Comment and Discussion