Tokenistic Participation as a Governance Mechanism in Higher Education: “Asked to Participate, Not to Decide” and Teacher Agency

Tong Lu; Cheng  Zhang; Jin Xiaofeng

doi:10.25159/1947-9417/21355

Authors

Tong Lu Zhengzhou Tourism College
Cheng Zhang City University of Macau
Jin Xiaofeng Wenzhou Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/21355

Keywords:

Tokenistic participation, higher education governance, teacher agency, shared governance, faculty participation

Abstract

This study reconceptualises tokenistic participation as a governance mechanism in higher education contexts where participation is formally encouraged while decision-making authority remains limited. Drawing on qualitative interviews with 20 teachers working in public universities in China, the study examines how participation is enacted, interpreted, and negotiated in everyday governance practices. The findings show that participation is widely experienced as procedural rather than influential: Teachers are routinely consulted, yet their input rarely shapes final decisions and is often accompanied by limited feedback or justification. In this sense, tokenistic participation functions as a legitimacy and risk-management mechanism that channels voice without redistributing decision rights. Under these conditions, teacher agency is not eliminated but reconfigured through adaptive strategies such as compliance, withdrawal, and quiet resistance. Rather than challenging governance structures directly, these forms of agency often co-exist with, and may stabilise, existing arrangements by managing frustration without redistributing authority. By shifting attention from the presence of participation to its governing effects, the study contributes to critical debates on shared governance, professional agency, and the limits of participatory approaches to educational change under contemporary managerial conditions.

Author Biography

Cheng Zhang, City University of Macau

Department of Basic Education, Jiangxi Police Institute,

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, City University of Macau

References

Annala, J., J. Lindén, M. Mäkinen, and J. Henriksson. 2023. “Understanding Academic Agency in Curriculum Change in Higher Education”. Teaching in Higher Education 28 (6): 1310–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1881772.

Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation”. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.

Becker, A., C. Goode, J. Rivers, M. Tyler, and J. Becker. 2023. “Shared Governance and Systems Theory: A Mixed Methods Study of Faculty Perceptions and Ideas”. Higher Education Politics and Economics 9 (2): 22–47. https://www.ojed.org/index.php/hepe/article/view/5974.

Bergan, S. 2003. “Student Participation in Higher Education Governance”. https://www.academia.edu/download/34557441/student_Activism_participation_20_08_14.pdf.

Bromley, P., and W. W. Powell. 2012. “From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World”. Academy of Management Annals 6 (1): 483–530. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.684462.

Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8.

Childress, C., J. Nayyar, and I. Gibson. 2024. “Tokenism and Its Long-Term Consequences: Evidence from the Literary Field”. American Sociological Review 89 (1): 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224231214288.

Cong-Lem, N. 2024. “Teacher Agency for Change and Development in Higher Education: A Scoping Literature Review”. International Journal of Educational Reform. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879231224744.

Deem, R. 1998. “‘New Managerialism’ and Higher Education: The Management of Performances and Cultures in Universities in the United Kingdom”. International Studies in Sociology of Education 8 (1): 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021980020014.

Deem, R., S. Hillyard, and M. Reed. 2007. Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265909.001.0001.

Degn, L. 2018. “Academic Sensemaking and Behavioural Responses: Exploring How Academics Perceive and Respond to Identity Threats in Times of Turmoil”. Studies in Higher Education 43 (2): 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1168796.

Giroux, H. 2002. “Neoliberalism, Corporate Culture, and the Promise of Higher Education: The University as a Democratic Public Sphere”. Harvard Educational Review 72 (4): 425–464. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.4.0515nr62324n71p1.

Jia, Q., D. Wang, and J. Ding. 2025. “Evolutionary Review of Teacher Agency Research over the Past 22 Years (2003–2024): A Bibliometric Analysis”. SAGE Open 15 (2): 21582440251342633. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251342633.

Kezar, A. J., and E. M. Holcombe. 2017. Shared Leadership in Higher Education: Important Lessons from Research and Practice. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. http://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Shared-Leadership-in-Higher-Education.pdf.

King, E. B., M. R. Hebl, J. M. George, and S. F. Matusik. 2010. “Understanding Tokenism: Antecedents and Consequences of a Psychological Climate of Gender Inequity”. Journal of Management 36 (2): 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308328508.

Lo, W. Y. W. 2025. “Trust and Tension: Shared Governance in Higher Education amid Student Activism”. Studies in Higher Education 50 (12): 3016–3031. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2449243.

McNaughtan, J., E. A. Enright, W. Xie, M. S. Billings, and N. F. Harris. 2025. “Shared Governance in Wicked Times: Perceptions of Faculty Senate Presidents on Faculty and Administrator Relationships”. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 127 (1): 33–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681251322581.

Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony”. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550.

Olssen, M., and M. A. Peters. 2005. “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism”. Journal of Education Policy 20 (3): 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718.

Pineda, P., and D. Salazar Morales. 2024. “Managerialism, Accreditation and Insecure Academic Employment across Different Higher Education Traditions”. Studies in Higher Education 49 (11): 2080–2103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2289087.

Priestley, M., G. J. J. Biesta, S. Philippou, and S. Robinson. 2015. “The Teacher and the Curriculum: Exploring Teacher Agency”. In The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment, edited by D. Wyse, L. Hayward, and J. Pandya, 187–201. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921405.n12.

Shattock, M. 2014. International Trends in University Governance: Autonomy, Self-Government and the Distribution of Authority. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315769028.

Shore, C., and S. Wright. 2015. “Audit Culture Revisited: Rankings, Ratings, and the Reassembling of Society”. Current Anthropology 56 (3): 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1086/681534.