If Not in Science, Then Where Are the Women? A Content Analysis of School Textbooks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/8926

Keywords:

femininity, masculinity, education, content analysis

Abstract

This article analyses the representation of femininity in school textbooks in search of elements that discourage girls from taking up scientific educational paths. Quantitative content analysis and elements of the constant comparison method were used to examine the content of 75 Polish textbooks. Significant differences were identified in the number of male and female characters, their ages, financial resources, occupations, family roles and mental characteristics. Interestingly, the authors of the analysed textbooks are mostly women, which seems to indicate a manifestation of self-discrimination. These results indicate the existence of mechanisms discouraging females from a scientific career and are discussed in light of Hofstede’s masculinity-femininity theory.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Allen, M. 2017. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.

An, D., and S. Kim. 2007. “Relating Hofstede’s Masculinity Dimension to Gender Role Portrayals in Advertising : A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Web Advertisements". International Marketing Review 24 (2): 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330710741811.

Atay, M., and I. Danju. 2012. “Analysis of 1st Grade and 5th Grade Textbooks and Primary School Student’s Views about Personal Traits in Gender Role in Society”. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 47: 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.614.

Barton, A., and L. N. Sakwa. 2012. “The Representation of Gender in English Textbooks in Uganda”. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 20 (2): 173–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.669394.

Basow, S. 2004. “The Hidden Curriculum: Gender in the Classroom”. In Praeger Guide to the Psychology of Gender, edited by M. A. Paludi, 117–31. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

Bem, S. L. 1974. “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42 (2): 155–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215.

Bem, S. L. 1993. The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Berheide, C. W. 1992. “Women Still ‘Stuck’ in Low-Level Jobs”. Women in Public Service: A Bulletin of the Center for Women in Government 3 (1): 1–4.

Biemmi, I. 2015. “The Imagery of Gender in Italian Textbooks. Research into Primary School Books”. Foro De Educación 13 (18): 15–35. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015.013.018.000.

Blickenstaff, J. C. 2005. “Women and Science Careers: Leaky Pipeline or Gender Filter?” Gender and Education 17 (4): 369–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072.

Boski, P. 2006. “Humanism-Materialism: Centuries-Long Polish Cultural Origins and 20 Years of Research in Cultural Psychology”. In Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context, edited by U. Kim, K. S. Yang, and K. K. Hwang, 373–402. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_17.

Busolt, U., and K. Kugele. 2009. “The Gender Innovation and Research Productivity Gap in Europe”. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 4 (2–3): 109–22. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2009.028066.

Byrne, E. M. 1993. Women and Science: The Snark Syndrome. London: Falmer.

Carlson, M., and T. Kanci. 2017. “The Nationalised and Gendered Citizen in a Global World—Examples from Textbooks, Policy and Steering Documents in Turkey and Sweden”. Gender and Education 29 (3): 313–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1143917.

Cheryan, S., S. A. Ziegler, A. K. Montoya, and L. Jiang. 2017. “Why Are Some STEM Fields More Gender Balanced than Others?” Psychological Bulletin 143 (1): 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052.

Chmura-Rutkowska, I., M. Mazurek, A. Soltysiak-Luczak, and M. Dudy. 2016. Gender W Podrecznikach: Projekt Badawczy. Warszawa: Fundacja Feminoteka.

Cobano-Delgado, V. C., and V. Llorent-Bedmar. 2019. “Identity and Gender in Childhood. Representation of Moroccan Women in Textbooks”. Women’s Studies International Forum 74: 137–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.03.011.

Commeyras, M. 1996. “Reading about Women in World History Textbooks from One Feminist Perspective”. Gender and Education 8 (1): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/713668481.

Corredor, E. S. 2019. “Unpacking ‘Gender Ideology’ and the Global Right’s Antigender Countermovement”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 44 (3): 613–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/701171.

Cronin, C., and A. Roger. 1999. “Theorizing Progress: Women in Science, Engineering, and Technology in Higher Education”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36 (6): 637–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199908)36:6%3C637::AID-TEA4%3E3.0.CO;2-9.

Daniels, H., A. Creese, V. Hey, and D. Leonard. 2004. “Gendered Learning Identity in Two Modalities of Pedagogic Discourse”. In Reading Bernstein, Researching Bernstein, edited by J. Muller, B. Davies and A. Morais, 123–36. London: Routledge and Falmer.

Domanski, H., and A. Dukaczewska. 1995. “Is Individualism in Poland Still Alive?” Social Science Information 34 (3): 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901895034003002.

Dutta, S., B. Lavin, and S. Wunsch-Vincent, eds. 2020. Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation? 13th ed. Cornell University, INSEAD and World Intellectual Property Organization. Accessed January 11, 2022. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf.

Eccles, J. S., P. Frome, K. S. Yoon, C. Freeman-Doan, and J. Jacobs. 2000. “Gender-Role Socialization in the Family: A Longitudinal Approach”. In The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, edited by T. Eckes and H. M. Trautner, 333–60. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Eder, D., and S. Parker. 1987. “The Cultural Production and Reproduction of Gender: The Effect of Extracurricular Activities on Peer-Group Culture”. Sociology of Education 60 (3): 200–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112276.

Evans, L., and K. Davies. 2000. “No Sissy Boys Here: A Content Analysis of the Representation of Masculinity in Elementary School Reading Textbooks”. Sex Roles 42 (3): 255–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007043323906.

Favilli, E., and F. Cavallo. 2017. Good Night Stories for Rebel Girls. Venice, CA: Timbuktu Labs.

Florida, R., C. Mellander, and K. King. 2015. The Global Creativity Index. Toronto: Martin Prosperity Institute.

Gharbavi, A., and S. A. Mousavi. 2012. “A Content Analysis of Textbooks: Investigating Gender Bias as a Social Prominence in Iranian High School English Textbooks”. English Linguistics Research 1 (1): 42–49. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v1n1p42.

Gilbert, J. 2001. “Science and Its ‘Other’: Looking Underneath ‘Woman’ and ‘Science’ for New Directions in Research on Gender and Science Education”. Gender and Education 13 (3): 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250120063571.

Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.

Good, J. J., J. A. Woodzicka, and L. C. Wingfield. 2010. “The Effects of Gender Stereotypic and Counter-Stereotypic Textbook Images on Science Performance”. The Journal of Social Psychology 150 (2): 132–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903366552.

Gouvias, D., and C. Alexopoulos. 2018. “Sexist Stereotypes in the Language Textbooks of the Greek Primary School: A Multidimensional Approach”. Gender and Education 30 (5): 642–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1237620.

Graff, A. 2014. “Report from the Gender Trenches: War Against ‘Genderism’ in Poland”. European Journal of Women’s Studies 21 (4): 431–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506814546091.

Gupta, A. F., and A. L. S. Yin. 1990. “Gender Representation in English Language Textbooks Used in the Singapore Primary Schools”. Language and Education 4 (1): 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789009541271.

Handelsman, J., N. Cantor, M. Carnes, D. Denton, E. Fine, B. Grosz, and V. Hinshaw, C. Marrettsue, R. Shalala, and J. Sheridan. 2005. “More Women in Science”. Science 309 (5738): 1190–91. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1113252.

Hernandez, M., P. Gonzalez, and S. Sanchez. 2013. “Gender and Constructs from the Hidden Curriculum”. Creative Education 4 (12): 89–92. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.412A2013.

Hill, C., C. Corbett, and A. St. Rose. 2010. Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.

Hofstede, G. 1996. “Gender Stereotypes and Partner Preferences of Asian Women in Masculine and Feminine Cultures”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 27 (5): 533–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022196275003.

Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hofstede, G. 2011. “Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context”. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.

Hofstede Insights. 2020. “Country Comparison”. Accessed November 10, 2020. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/poland/.

Incikabi, L., and F. Ulusoy. 2019. “Gender Bias and Stereotypes in Australian, Singaporean and Turkish Mathematics Textbooks”. Turkish Journal of Education 8 (4): 298–317. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.581802.

GUS (Glowny Urzad Statystyczny). 2020. “Infografika: Miedzynarodowy Dzien Kobiet i Dziewczat w Nauce” [Infographics: International Day of Women and Girls in Science]. Accessed November 5, 2020. https://stat.gov.pl/infografiki-widzety/infografiki/infografika-miedzynarodowy-dzien-kobiet-i-dziewczat-w-nauce,81,1.html.

Kabira, W. M., and M. Masinjila. 1997. ABC of Gender Analysis. Nairobi: Forum for African Women Educationalists.

Kanci, T. 2008. “Cumhuriyet’In Ilk Yillarindan Bugunlere Ders Kitaplarinda Kadinlik Ve Erkeklik Kurgulari”. In Cinsiyet Halleri: Turkiye de Toplumsal Cinsiyetin Kesisim Alanlari, edited by N. Mutluer, 88–102. Istanbul: Varlik Yayinlari

Knapp, L. G., J. E. Kelly-Reid, and R. W. Whitmore. 2006. Postsecondary Institutions in the United States: Fall 2005 and Degrees and Other Awards Conferred: 2004–05. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.

Kobia, J. M. 2009. “Femininity and Masculinity in English Primary School Textbooks in Kenya”. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture 28: 57–71.

Koch, J. 2003. “Gender Issues in the Classroom”. In Handbook of Psychology, edited by W. M. Reynolds and G. E. Miller, 259–81. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0712.

Kostas, M. 2021. “Discursive Construction of Hegemonic Masculinity and Emphasised Femininity in the Textbooks of Primary Education: Children’s Discursive Agency and Polysemy of the Narratives”. Gender and Education 33 (1): 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1632807.

Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Lamas, M. 1996. “Uses, Difficulties and Possibilities of the Gender Category”. In Gender, the Cultural Construction of Sexual Difference, edited by M. Lamas, 327–66. Mexico: University Program for Gender Studies, National Autonomous University of Mexico.

Lee, J. F. K. 2014. “A Hidden Curriculum in Japanese EFL Textbooks: Gender Representation”. Linguistics and Education 27: 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.07.002.

Lubart, T. 2010. “Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Creativity”. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, 2nd ed., edited by J. Kaufman and R. Sternberg, 265–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.017.

Maceira, H. M. 2017. “Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU”. Intereconomics 52 (3): 178–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-017-0669-4.

Markus, H. R., and S. Kitayama. 1991. “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation”. Psychological Review 98 (2): 224–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.

McLaughlin, F. E., and L. A. Marascuilo. 1990. Advanced Nursing and Health Care Research: Quantification Approaches. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

Mendick, H. 2006. Masculinities in Mathematics. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Mlodozeniec, M., and A. Knapinska. 2013. “Czy Nauka Wciaz Ma Meska Plec? Udzial Kobiet W Nauce”. Nauka 2: 47–72.

MNE (Ministry of National Education). 2017. “Wykaz podrecznikow dopuszczonych do uzytku szkolnego do ksztalcenia ogolnego”. Accessed November 10, 2020. https://podreczniki.men.gov.pl/podreczniki/1.

Moser, F., and B. Hannover. 2014. “How Gender Fair Are German Schoolbooks in the Twenty-First Century? An Analysis of Language and Illustrations in Schoolbooks for Mathematics and German”. European Journal of Psychology of Education 29 (3): 38–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0204-3.

Musty, N. 2015. “Teaching Inequality: A Study of Gender Identity in EFL Textbooks”. Identity Papers: A Journal of British and Irish Studies 1 (2): 37–56. https://doi.org/10.5920/idp.2015.1237.

Osadan, R., M. Belesova, and L. Szentesiova. 2018. “Sissies, Sportsmen and Moms Standing over Stoves: Gender Aspect of Readers and Mathematics Textbooks for Primary Education in Slovakia”. Foro De Educacion 16 (25): 243–61. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.549.

Osler, A. 1994. “Still Hidden from History? The Representation of Women in Recently Published History Textbooks”. Oxford Review of Education 20 (2): 219–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498940200206.

Oyserman, D., H. M. Coon, and M. Kemmelmeier. 2002. “Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analyses”. Psychological Bulletin 128 (1): 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3.

Pankowska, D. 2005. Wychowanie i role plciowe [Upbringing and Gender Roles]. Gdansk: GWP. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2018.090196.

Papadakis, S. 2018. “Gender Stereotypes in Greek Computer Science School Textbooks”. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies 9 (1): 48–71.

Rahman, M. S. 2017. “The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language ‘Testing and Assessment’ Research: A Literature Review”. Journal of Education and Learning 6 (1): 102–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102.

Rifkin, B. 1998. “Gender Representation in Foreign Language Textbooks: A Case Study of Textbooks of Russian”. The Modern Language Journal 82 (2): 217–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01195.x.

Rossi, A. S. 1965. “Women in Science: Why So Few? Social and Psychological Influences Restrict Women’s Choice and Pursuit of Careers in Science”. Science 148 (3674): 1196–202. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3674.1196.

Rudowicz, E. 2003. “Creativity and Culture: A Two Way Interaction”. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 47 (3): 273–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308602.

Runge, T. E., D. Frey, P. M. Gollwitzer, R. L. Helmreich, and J. T. Spence. 1981. “Masculine (Instrumental) and Feminine (Expressive) Traits: A Comparison between Students in the United States and West Germany”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 12 (2): 142–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022181122002.

Sanfey, H., M. Crandall, E. Shaughnessy, S. L. Stein, A. Cochran, S. Parangi, and C. Laronga. 2017. “Strategies for Identifying and Closing the Gender Salary Gap in Surgery”. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 225 (2): 333–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.03.018.

Signorielli, N. 1990. “Children, Television, and Gender Roles: Messages and Impact”. Journal of Adolescent Health Care 11 (1): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-0070(90)90129-P.

Sobczak, A. 2018. “The Queen Bee Syndrome. The Paradox of Women Discrimination on the Labour Market”. Journal of Gender and Power 9 (1): 51–61.

Sovic, A., and V. Hus. 2015. “Gender Stereotype Analysis of the Textbooks for Young Learners”. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 186: 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.080

Spence, J. T. 1984. “Masculinity, Femininity, and Gender-Related Traits: A Conceptual Analysis and Critique of Current Research”. Progress in Experimental Personality Research 13: 1–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-541413-5.50006-1.

Staines, G., C. Tavris, and T. E. Jayaratne. 1974. “The Queen Bee Syndrome”. Psychology Today 7 (8): 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/e400562009-003.

Strauss, A. L., and J. M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Szacka, B. 1997. “Kobiety I Mezczyzni, Dziewczynki I Chlopcy. Podzial Wedle Plci W Prezentowanym Dzieciom Obrazie Swiata”. In Portrety Kobiet I Mezczyzn W Srodkach Masowego Przekazu Oraz Podrecznikach Szkolnych, edited by R. Siemienska, 105–115. Warszawa: Scholar

Tang, H., B. Chen, and W. Zhang. 2010. “Gender Issues in Mathematical Textbooks of Primary Schools”. Journal of Mathematics Education 3 (2): 106–14.

Thorne, B. 1993. Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Toçi, A., and M. Aliu. 2013. “Gender Stereotypes in Current Children’s English Books Used in Elementary Schools in the Republic of Macedonia”. American International Journal of Contemporary Research 3 (12): 32–38. Accessed January 12, 2022. http://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_12_December_2013/6.pdf.

Trusz, S. 2015. “Kulturowa Transmisja Stereotypu Plci. Co Sprawia, Ze Mezczyzni Studiuja Na Kierunkach Scislych Lub Technicznych, A Kobiety Na Kierunkach Humanistycznych Lub Spolecznych?” Labor Et Educatio 3: 265–302.

Ullah, H., and C. Skelton. 2013. “Gender Representation in the Public Sector Schools Textbooks of Pakistan”. Educational Studies 39 (2): 183–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2012.702892.

Walford, G. 1981. “Tracking Down Sexism in Physics Textbooks”. Physics Education 16 (5): 261–65. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/16/5/303.

Watts, R. 2007. Women in Science: A Social and Cultural History. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962350.

Weber, R. P. 1985. Basic Content Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Williams, M. J., L. P. Elizabeth, and J. Spencer-Rodgers. 2010. “The Masculinity of Money: Automatic Stereotypes Predict Gender Differences in Estimated Salaries”. Psychology of Women Quarterly 34 (1): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01537.x.

Witt, S. D. 2000. “The Influence of Peers on Children’s Socialization to Gender Roles”. Early Child Development and Care 162 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443001620101.

World Bank. 2020. “GDP per Capita (Current US$)”. Accessed November 10, 2020. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-02

How to Cite

Gajda, Aleksandra, and Agnieszka Wolowicz. 2022. “If Not in Science, Then Where Are the Women? A Content Analysis of School Textbooks”. Education As Change 26 (February):26 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/8926.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2021-01-04
Accepted 2021-11-17
Published 2022-02-02