Applying Foucault to Participatory Assessment in Higher Education: A Case Study in South Africa

Cindy Ramhurry

doi:10.25159/1947-9417/9453

Authors

Cindy Ramhurry University of Johannesburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/9453

Keywords:

Participatory assessment, disciplinary power, higher education, Michel Foucault, Panoptic power

Abstract

Assessment policy reform has led to the adoption of a “participatory” framework of assessment in South African higher education. Using a Foucauldian theoretical lens, this article explores the relation between participatory assessment practices in higher education and social control. Empirical evidence is drawn from assessment practices observed in certain lectures in a South African university and interviews with lecturers. Data is analysed through a Foucauldian lens that forges a connection between disciplinary power, control and regulation. The article then describes the technologies of disciplinary power that play out within the participatory assessment practices and demonstrates what these technologies of power do to assessors and students when they become involved in them. The article argues that participatory assessment in some respects epitomises progressive educational themes, yet, when studied with an eye towards power, it reveals deep contradictions and paradoxes.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ball, S. J. 1990. Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.

Banks, S. R. 2012. Classroom Assessment: Issues and Practices. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

Bazeley, P. 2009. “Analysing Qualitative Data: More than ‘Identifying Themes’”. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research 2 (2): 6–22.

Beets, P. 2009. “Towards Integrated Assessment in South African Higher Education”. In Higher Education in South Africa: A Scholarly Look Behind the Scenes, edited by E. Blitzer, 183–202. Stellenbosch: Sun Media. https://doi.org/10.18820/9781920338183/09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18820/9781920338183/09

Berry, R., and B. Adamson. 2011. “Assessment Reform Past, Present and Future”. In Assessment Reform in Education: Policy and Practice, edited by R. Berry and B. Adamson, 3–14. Amsterdam: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0729-0_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0729-0_1

Birenbaum, M., and F. J. R. C. Dochy, eds. 1996. Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge. Boston, MA: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0657-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0657-3

Black, P., R. McCormick, M. James, and D. Pedder. 2006. “Learning How to Learn and Assessment for Learning: A Theoretical Inquiry”. Research Papers in Education 21 (2): 119–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520600615612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520600615612

Burbules, N. C. 1997. “Privacy, Surveillance, and Classroom Communication on the Internet”. Access: Contemporary Issues in Education 16 (1): 36–4.3

Chisholm, L., and R. Wildeman. 2013. “The Politics of Testing in South Africa”. Journal of Curriculum Studies 45 (1): 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.755710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.755710

Chomsky, N., and M. Foucault. 1974. “Human Nature: Justice versus Power”. In Reflexive Water: The Basic Concerns of Mankind, edited by A. J. Ayer and F. Elders, 133–97. Souvenir: London.

Clarke, S. 2005. Formative Assessment in the Secondary Classroom. London: Hodder Murray.

Dikli, S. 2003. “Assessment at a Distance: Traditional vs. Alternative Assessments”. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 2 (3): 13–19.

DoE (Department of Education). 1995. White Paper on Education and Training. Pretoria: DoE. Accessed September 8, 2008. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/16312gen1960.pdf.

DoE (Department of Education). 1998. Assessment Policy in the General Education and Training Band: Grade R to 9 and ABET. Government Gazette, Vol. 402, No. 19640. Pretoria: Government Printer.

DoE (Department of Education). 2002. Revised National Curriculum Statement Grades R–9 (Schools) Policy: Overview. Pretoria: DoE. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/CD/GET/doc/overview.pdf?ver=2006-11-21-100143-000.

DoE (Department of Education). 2005. The National Protocol on Assessment for Schools in the General and Further Education and Training Band (Grades R–12). Pretoria: DoE. Accessed September 19, 2022. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/doefetnationalprotocolassgrader12.pdf.

Earl, L. M. 2012. Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Ezzy, D. 2013. Qualitative Analysis. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315015484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315015484

Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by A. Sheridan. London: Allen Lane.

Foucault, M. 1978. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History”. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard, 139–64. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Foucault, M. 1980. “The Eye of Power”. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, edited by C. Gordon, 146–65. New York, NY: Pantheon.

Gane, M. 2013. Towards a Critique of Foucault: Foucault, Lacan and the Question of Ethics. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203092842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203092842

Gardner, J. 2012. Assessment and Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Genishi, C. 1997. “Assessing against the Grain: A Conceptual Framework for Alternative Assessments”. In Assessment for Equity and Inclusion: Embracing All Our Children, edited by A. L. Goodwin, 35–50. New York, NY: Routledge.

Giebelhaus, C. R., and C. L. Bowman. 2002. “Teaching Mentors: Is It Worth the Effort?” The Journal of Educational Research 95 (4): 246–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596597

Gipps, C. 1999. “Socio-Cultural Aspects of Assessment”. Review of Research in Education, American Educational Research Association 24: 357–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1167274

Gipps, C. 2011. Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203182437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203182437

Goodwin, A. L., ed. 1997. Assessment for Equity and Inclusion: Embracing All Our Children. New York, NY: Routledge.

Gore, J. M. 1995. “On the Continuity of Power Relations in Pedagogy”. International Studies in Sociology of Education 5 (2): 165–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021950050203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0962021950050203

Gutting, G. 2005. Foucault: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192805577.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192805577.001.0001

Hargreaves, E. 2005. “Assessment for Learning? Thinking Outside the (Black) Box”. Cambridge Journal of Education 35 (2): 213–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640500146880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640500146880

Hlatshwayo, M. N., L. B. Shawa, and S. A. Nxumalo. 2020. “Ubuntu Currere in the Academy: A Case Study from the South African Experience”. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 5 (1–2): 120–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2020.1762509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2020.1762509

Harwood, V. 2006. Diagnosing “Disorderly” Children: A Critique of Behaviour Disorder Discourses. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481936

Hoy, D. C. 1986. Foucault: A Critical Reader. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.

James, M. 2006. “Assessment, Teaching and Theories of Learning”. In Assessment and Learning, edited by J. Gardner, 47–60. London: Sage Publications.

Lambert, D., and D. Lines. 2013. Understanding Assessment: Purposes, Perceptions, Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

Le Grange, L. 2016. “Decolonising the University Curriculum”. South African Journal of Higher Education 30 (2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20853/30-2-709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20853/30-2-709

Lutz, S., and W. Huitt. 2004. “Connecting Cognitive Development and Constructivism: Implications from Theory for Instruction and Assessment”. Constructivism in the Human Sciences 9 (1): 67–90.

Marshall, J. D. 1990. “Asking Philosophical Questions about Education: Foucault on Punishment”. Educational Philosophy and Theory 22 (2): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.1990.tb00015.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.1990.tb00015.x

McFarland, D. A. 2001. “Student Resistance: How the Formal and Informal Organization of Classrooms Facilitate Everyday Forms of Student Defiance”. American Journal of Sociology 107 (3): 612–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/338779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/338779

McNay, L. 2013. Foucault: A Critical Introduction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

Megill, A. 1992. “Foucault, Ambiguity and the Rhetoric of Historiography”. In Rewriting the History of Madness: Studies in Foucault’s “Histoire de la Folie”, edited by A. Still and I. Velody, 86–104. New York, NY: Routledge.

Mockler, N. 2005. “Trans/Forming Teachers: New Professional Learning and Transformative Teacher Professionalism”. Journal of In-Service Education 31 (4): 733–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580500200380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580500200380

Nemorin, S. 2017. “Post-Panoptic Pedagogies: The Changing Nature of School Surveillance in the Digital Age”. Surveillance and Society 15 (2): 239–53. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i2.6033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i2.6033

Rabinow, P., ed. 1984. The Foucault Reader. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

Roth, J. 1992. “Of What Help Is He? A Review of Foucault and Education”. American Educational Research Journal 29 (4): 683–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029004683

Selwyn, N. 2000. “The National Grid for Learning: Panacea or Panopticon?” British Journal of Sociology of Education 21 (2): 243–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/713655340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713655340

Shepard, L. A. 2001. “The Role of Classroom Assessment in Teaching and Learning”. In The Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by V. Richardson, 1066–101. Washington, DC: AERA.

Smart, B. 2013. Foucault, Marxism and Critique. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203092798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203092798

Spaull, N. 2015. “Schooling in South Africa: How Low-Quality Education Becomes a Poverty Trap”. In South African Child Gauge, edited by A. De Lannoy, S. Swartz, L. Lake and C. Smith, 34–41. Cape Town: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town.

Stiggins, R., and J. Chappuis. 2005. “Using Student-Involved Classroom Assessment to Close Achievement Gaps”. Theory into Practice 44 (1): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4401_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4401_3

Still, A., and I. Velody, eds. 1992. Rewriting the History of Madness: Studies in Foucault’s “Histoire de la Folie”. New York, NY: Routledge.

Taylor, C. 1984. “Foucault on Freedom and Truth”. Political Theory 12 (2): 152–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591784012002002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591784012002002

Taylor, D. 2014. Michel Foucault: Key Concepts. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315711478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315711478

Terre Blanche, M. J., K. Durrheim, and D. Painter. 2006. Research in Practice: Applied Methods for the Social Sciences. Johannesburg: Juta.

Torrance, H. 2012. “Triangulation, Respondent Validation, and Democratic Participation in Mixed Methods Research”. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6 (2): 111–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437185

UJ (University of Johannesburg). 2019. Policy on Assessment. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.

Viriasova, I. 2006. “The Problem of Freedom in the Works of Michel Foucault”. Central European University Political Science Journal 1 (5): 62–75.

Wilmot, D. 2005. “The Development Phase of a Case Study of Outcomes-Based Education Assessment Policy in the Human and Social Sciences Learning Area of C2005”. South African Journal of Education 25 (2): 69–76.

Wilson, R. J. 2005. Dilemmas in Classroom Assessment. San Francisco, CA: Portage and Main Press.