ENHANCING STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN FIRST YEAR CHEMISTRY THROUGH WEB -BASED LEARNING IN AN OPEN DISTANCE UNIVERSITY CONTEXT

Authors

  • Hadley S Clayton Department of Chemistry, Private Bag X 6, UNISA
  • Mark G Smith Department of Chemistry, Private Bag X 6, UNISA (Florida Campus), 171

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8853/1048

Keywords:

General chemistry, course design, on-line tuition support, interactive web-based learning, online assessment, formative assessment, Open Distance Learning (ODL).

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a study to assess the impact of MasteringChemistry® on student performance in chemistry. The proprietary MasteringChemistry® is a web-based tutoring application and assessment system currently used in first year chemistry modules at the University of South Africa (Unisa). This web-based programme provides supplementary work, giving students practice with instructor-assigned problems. The system is able to coach students with feedback specific to their needs and with simpler problems upon request. The application also provides the individual student with immediate and specific feedback on incorrect or partially incorrect answers. There is great potential for web-based learning in an open distance-learning environment. In particular, in subjects such as chemistry where problem-solving strategies are intrinsic to the learning process, the internet could be an effective medium for teaching and learning. The rationale for this study was to explore new teaching strategies to increase the pass rate in chemistry. A profile of the student demographic, with data gathered from registration records, is presented. Data collection on student assessment occurred through the instructor diagnostic tools in the MasteringChemistry® application or with the assistance of the Unisa Examination Administration. Here we present preliminary results that indicate that most students who regularly accessed the material achieved better examination results than those who did not. This pilot study has led to improved and innovative formative assessment practices by the academic staff in the Chemistry Department at Unisa. It further formed an interesting and challenging learning experience for staff investigating web-based approaches directed at improvement of their assessment activities.

 

References

Ardac, D., and A. H. Sezen. 2002. Effectiveness of computer-based Chemistry instruction in enhancing the learning of content and variable control under guided versus unguided conditions. Journal of Science Education and Technology 11(1): 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013995314094

Belland, J. B. S. 2009. Comparison of homework systems (four web-based) used in first term General Chemistry. MSc thesis, University of North Texas.

Brooks, D. W., and K. J. Crippen. 2001. Learning difficult content using the Web: Strategies make a difference. Journal of Science Education and Technology 10(4): 283–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012213700431

Carliner, S. 2004. An overview of online learning. 2nd ed. Amherst: HRD Press.

Cole, R. S., and J. B. Todd. 2003. Effects of web-based multimedia homework with immediate rich feedback on student learning in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 80(11): 1338–1343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p1338

Conrad, D. 2002. Deep in the hearts of learners: Insights into the nature of online community. Journal of Distance Education 17(1): 1−19.

Crippen, K. J., and L. E. Boyd. 2007. The impact of web-based worked examples and selfexplanation on performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy. Computers & Education 49(3): 809–821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.018

Downing, K. F., and J. K. Holtz 2008. Online science learning: Best practices and technologies. Hershey: IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-986-1

Evans, J. 2009. OWL (Online Web-Based Learning). Journal of Chemical Education 86(6): 695– 696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p695

Frailich, M., M. Kesner and A. Hofstein. 2007. The influence of web-based chemistry learning on students’ perceptions, attitudes, and achievements. Research in Science & Technological Education 25(2): 179–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701250659

Freasier, B., G. Collins and P. Newitt. 2003. A web-based interactive homework quiz and tutorial package to motivate undergraduate chemistry students and improve learning. Journal of Chemical Education 80(11): 1344–1347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p1344

Geduld, B. 2013. Students’ experiences of demands and challenges in open distance education: A South African case. Progressio 35(2): 102–125.

Harasim, L. 2000. Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education 3(1-2): 41–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00032-4

Harasim, L. 2011. Learning theory and online technologies. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846933

Heeren, J. K. 1990. Teaching chemistry by the Socratic method. Journal of Chemical Education 67(4): 330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed067p330

Heydenrych, J. F., and P. Prinsloo. 2010. Revisiting the five generations of distance education: Quo vadis? Progressio 32(1): 5–26.

Holmberg, B. 1989. Theory and practice of distance education. London: Routledge.

Khoza, S. B. 2011. Who promotes web-based teaching and learning in higher education? Progressio 33(1): 155–170.

Korkmaz, A., S. William and W. S. Harwood. 2004. Web-supported chemistry education: Design of an online tutorial for learning molecular symmetry. Journal of Science Education and Technology 13(2): 243–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000031263.82327.6e

Leontyev, A., and D. Baranov. 2013. Massive Open Online Courses in chemistry: A comparative overview of platforms and features. Journal of Chemical Education 90(11): 1533−1539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400283x

Lowry, R. 2005. Computer aided self-assessment – an effective tool. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 6(4): 198–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90010G

Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C. and Galyen, K. 2011. E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education 14(2): 129– 135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001

Moore, M. G. 1993. Theory of transactional distance. In Theoretical principles of distance education, ed. D. Keegan, 22–38. New York: Routledge.

Nick, S., J. Andresen, B. Lübker and L. Thumm. 2003. CHEMnet – structure, design, and evaluation of an online chemistry course. Journal of Science Education and Technology 12(3): 333–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025045309823

Pienta, N. J. 2013. Online Courses in chemistry: Salvation or downfall? Journal of Chemical Education 90(3): 271–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400097s

Shepherd, T. D. 2009. Mastering Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 86(6): 694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p694

Steyn, M. M. De V., P. M. Alexander and D. Rohm. 1996. CAL for First Year Analytical Chemistry by Distance Education. Computers & Education 27(2): 95–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1315(96)84810-X

Van Rooy, M. P. and M. Madiope 2012. Enhancing assessment in ODL: The Unisa online experience. Progressio 34(1): 156–169.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-10

How to Cite

Clayton, Hadley S, and Mark G Smith. 2016. “ENHANCING STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN FIRST YEAR CHEMISTRY THROUGH WEB -BASED LEARNING IN AN OPEN DISTANCE UNIVERSITY CONTEXT”. Progressio 38 (1):74-86. https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-8853/1048.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2016-04-21
Accepted 2016-05-23
Published 2016-11-10