Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use and Value of Framework for a Team Approach in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era at an Open Distance and e-Learning Institution

Authors

  • Mishack Gumbo University of South Africa
  • Gabaiphiwe Moleko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/14647

Keywords:

instructional design, ADDIE, Framework for a Team Approach, Open Distance and e-Learning, Open Distance Education, Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR)

Abstract

This single exploratory case study explored the perceptions of academic staff, electronic originators, and instructional designers of the Framework for a Team Approach (FTA) and their awareness of its value and application within the learning management system (LMS) in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). This was done to determine the continued relevance of FTA to the changing technological environment, especially considering the demands of the 4IR. Instructional design (ID) processes are critical to the success of the academic project. A South African Open Distance and e-Learning (ODeL) institution, i.e. the University of South Africa (UNISA), applies an FTA to guide curriculum and learning development based on the Analyse, Design, Develop, Implement and Evaluate (ADDIE) approach to guide the ID processes. FTA was developed during the era of printed study guides as a teaching tool. However, with the advancement of technology propelled by the 4IR, UNISA decided to migrate all academic activities to the online platform. There is, therefore, a need to investigate the perceptions of academic staff, electronic originators, and instructional designers regarding the use of the FTA and its continued relevance in the evolving technological environment, given the shift in teaching mode at UNISA. Instructional designers, electronic originators and academic staff members involved in the ID process were purposively selected to participate in the research. Findings indicate that the framework remains generally still useful but requires minor adaptation to align with the changing context, especially considering the pressing demands of the 4IR. UNISA will be better informed about the perceptions surrounding the use of the FTA and its relevance to the demands of the 4IR.

References

Bichelmeyer, B. A. 2004. "The ADDIE Model: A Metaphor for the Lack of Clarity in the Field of IDT." Association for Educational Communications and Technology IDT Futures Group Presentations. Chicago, IL.

Branch, R. M. 2009. Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York: Springer Science, Business Media.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Caplan, D., and Graham, R. 2008. "The Development of Online Courses." In The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, edited by T. Anderson, 245-263. Athabasca University: AU Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.012

Carr-Chellman, A. A. 2016. Instructional Design for Teachers: Improving Classroom Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773032

Charbonneau-Gowdy, P., and Galdames, C. 2021. "Connecting the Dots: Putting Instructional Design Theory into Practice in Online Courses." 20th Century European Conference. Santiago, USA.

Chen, I. 2011. "Instructional Design Methodologies. In Instructional Design: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications," edited by Information Resources Management Association, 80-94. Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-503-2.ch108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-503-2.ch108

Gustafson, K. L., and Branch, R. M. 2002. "What Is Instructional Design?" In Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, edited by R. A. Reiser and J. A. Dempsey, 333-343. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Leedy, P. D., and Ormrod, J. E. 2015. Practical Research: Planning and Design. 11th ed. Boston: Pearson.

Marshall, M. N. 1996. "Sampling for Qualitative Research." Family Practice 13: 522-525. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522

Moore, M. G., and Kearsley, G. 2012. Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning. Belmont: Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning.

Nishé, C., Farrell, O., Brunton, J., and Costello, E. 2022. "Integrating Design Thinking into Instructional Design: The OpenTeach Case Study." Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 38 (1): 33-52. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6667

Oliffe, J. L., Kelly, M. T., Montaner, G. G., and Yu Ko, W. F. 2021. "Zoom Interviews: Benefits and Concessions." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211053522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211053522

Peters, O. 2007. "The Most Industrialized Form of Education." In Handbook of Distance Education, edited by M. G. Moore, 57-68. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Roberts, J. K., Pavlakis, A. E., and Richards, M. P. 2021. "It's More Complicated than it Seems: l Qualitative Research in COVID-19 Era." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211002959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211002959

Seel, N.M., Lehmann, T. Blumschein, P., and Podolskiy, O.A. 2017. Instructional Design for Learning: Theoretical Foundations. Rotterdam, NL: Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-941-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-941-6

Sharif, A., and Cho, S. 2015. "21st Century Instructional Designers: Bridging the Perceptual Gaps Between Identity, Practice, Impact and Professional Development." RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal 12 (3): 72-85. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i3.2176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i3.2176

Turner, D. P. 2020. "Sampling Methods in Research Design." Headache 60(1): 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13707 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13707

Wickham, M., and Woods, M. 2005. "Reflecting on the Strategic Use of CAQDAS to Manage and Report on the Qualitative Research Process." The Qualitative Report 10(4): 687-702.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Gumbo, Mishack, and Gabaiphiwe Moleko. 2025. “Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use and Value of Framework for a Team Approach in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era at an Open Distance and E-Learning Institution ”. Progressio 46 (December):13 pages . https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/14647.

Issue

Section

Articles