Assessing Students' Aptitude in Analysing 3D Scanned Women's Body Shapes to Improve Fashion Curriculum Design

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/17447

Keywords:

3D body scan, South African women, fashion curriculum design, technology-enhanced teaching, ODeL, visual assessments

Abstract

Unisa emphasises responsive student-centredness, recognising the role of an engaged student for future career success and lifelong learning. This research adopted a learner-centred approach, integrating point cloud scans from a 3D full-body scanner into a module for third-year fashion and textile undergraduates. Traditionally, the fashion sector designs apparel for an hourglass woman’s body type. However, South African researchers report that this shape does not represent the majority of women in the country. This research aimed to assess the competence of undergraduate fashion students in visually assessing women’s body shapes to develop cognitive skills for the workplace. Twenty-nine students visually assessed 31 3D scans provided as 2D black and white images. The experts and students identified the dominant shapes of spoon, hourglass and rectangle. In addition, the students reported the triangle, inverted triangle and diamond. Of the 31-point cloud images, 52% of the student’s classifications correlated with those of the clothing industry experts; 48% of the students experienced challenges in accurately assessing asymmetrical body shapes with varying frame sizes across different classifications. The findings suggest that fashion students demonstrate a degree of skill in visually assessing women’s body shapes. Recommendations include using 3D printed models and interactive 360° videos to enhance cognitive abilities. Integrating 3D scanning technology into the curriculum offers sustainable benefits by streamlining processes, improving digital competence and standardising body measurements to SANS 8559-1. This integration not only develops essential workplace skills but also educates students on minimising waste throughout the design-to-garment construction process, thereby aligning academic instruction with industry norms.

References

Bremner, N., N. Sakata and L. Cameron. 2022. “The Outcomes of Learner-Centred Pedagogy: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Educational Development 94: 102649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102649

Connell, L.J., P.V. Ulrich, E. L. Brannon, M. Alexander and A. B. Presley. 2006. “Body Shape Assessment Scale: Instrument Development for Analyzing Female Figures.” Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 24 (2): 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0602400203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X0602400203

Elbrecht, P., and K. J. Palm. 2016. “Information Processing for Mass-Customized Clothing Production.” IEEE tenth International Conference Proceedings on Semantic Computing. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2016.51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2016.51

Gribbin, E. A. 2014. “Body Shape and Its Influence on Apparel Size and Consumer Choices.” Designing Apparel for Consumers: The Impact of Body shape and Size. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782422150.1.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782422150.1.3

Kadolph, S. J. 2008. Quality Assurance for Textiles and Apparel, 2nd ed. Fairchild. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501391675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501391675

Keengwe, J., G. Onchwari and J. Onchwari. 2009. “Technology and Student Learning: Toward a Learner-Centered Teaching Model.” Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal 17 (1): 11–22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255567367_Technology_and_Student_Learning_Towards_a_Learner-Centered_Teaching_Model.

Lee, Y. S. 2014. “Developing Apparel Sizing Systems for Particular Groups.” Anthropometry, Apparel Sizing and Design: Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857096890.2.197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857096890.2.197

Liechty, E., J. Rasband and D. Potterberg-Steineckert. 2010. Fitting and Pattern Alteration: A Multi-Method Approach to the Art of Style Selection, Fitting and Alteration, 2nd ed. Fairchild Books.

Mabotja, R., and T. R. Nganase. 2024. “Media Influence on the Body Image of Black Women in a South African Township.” Gender and Behaviour 21 (3). https://www.ajol.info/index.php/gab/article/view/265089.

Makhanya, B. P., and D. C. Mabuza. 2020. “Body Cathexis and Fit Preferences of Young South African Women of Different Body Shapes and Ethnicity.” International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education 13 (2): 173–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2020.1761460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2020.1761460

Milliam, R. 2019–2024. “South African Women Body Dimensions/Size Tables and Body Shapes.” Figure Forms, in conversation.

Muthambi, A., H. de Klerk and A. Mason. 2015. “Sizing for Ethnicity in Multi-Cultural Societies: Development of Size Specifications for Young South African Women of African Descent.” Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences 43 (1): 62–72.

Pandarum, R., W. Yu and L. Hunter. 2011. “3-D Breast Anthropometry of Plus-Sized Women in South Africa.” Ergonomics 54 (9): 866–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.597515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.597515

Pandarum, R., S. C. Hunter, L. Hunter and G. A. V. Leaf. 2021. “A Normative Method for the Classification and Assessment of Women’s 3-D Scanned Morphotypes.” International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 33 (3): 421–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-06-2020-0089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-06-2020-0089

Phasha, M. M., S. Harlock and R. Pandarum. 2020. “Developing Size Charts for Petite South African Women from 3D Body Scanned E-Tape Measurements.” Journal of Consumer Sciences 48: 98–111.

Ruto, A. C. 2009. Dynamic Human Modelling and Animation. University of London.

SANS 8559-1. 2019. Size Designation of Clothes. Part 1: Anthropometric Definitions for Body Measurement. South African Bureau of Standards.

Simmons, K., and C. Istook. 2003. “Comparison of Three-Dimensional Body Scanners.” Textiles Magazine 30 (3): 12–16.

Simmons, K., C. L. Istook and P. Devarajan. 2004. “Female Figure Identification Technique (FFIT) for Apparel – Part I: Describing Female Shapes.” Journal of Textiles and Apparel, Technology and Management 4 (1): 1–16.

Stefan, D. B., and D. A. Gilbert. 2016. “The Cycle of Shape Descriptor Suite: When Do People Become Overweight?” In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on 3D Body Scanning Technologies, Lugano, Switzerland, 239–54. https://doi.org/10.15221/16.239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15221/16.239

Strydom, M. 2006. “An Evaluation of South African Apparel Related Population Measures and Sizing Systems.” Master’s thesis, University of Pretoria.

[TC]2. 2016. “3D Body Scanner.” Accessed 25 March 2024. http://www.tc2.com/.

Weimer, M. 2002. Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. Jossey-Bass.

Xu, B., W. Yu, T. Chen and Y. Huang. 2003. “Three-Dimensional Technology for Apparel Mass Customization: Part 11: Human Body Modelling from Unorganized Range Data.” Journal of the Textile Institute 94 (1–2): 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000308630596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000308630596

Zwane, P., and N. Magagula. 2006. “Pattern Design for Women with Disproportionate Figures: A Case Study for Swaziland.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 31 (3): 283–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00549.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00549.x

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Pandarum, Reena. 2025. “Assessing Students’ Aptitude in Analysing 3D Scanned Women’s Body Shapes to Improve Fashion Curriculum Design”. Progressio 46 (December):11 pages . https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/17447.

Issue

Section

Themed Section - (ITLC) International Teaching and Learning Conference